An imaginative fiction writer who was pretty good at fashioning a post-religious myth system for the "modernist" age. In that capacity, his influence endures (especially in certain humanities corners of the academy), and is only somewhat undeserved.
Obviously, his claims have less than zero empirical value, and are at best the psychological profession's equivalent of phlogiston.
Much superior to "postmodernist" age. At least a a myth is grounded in something unlike the bullsh**t we have to deal with today where words change their definitions & ideas mean different things depending on the speaker & time they are spoken.
Poll
