WaPo: The GOP is no party for blacks, Latinos, and gays (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 02:20:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  WaPo: The GOP is no party for blacks, Latinos, and gays (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WaPo: The GOP is no party for blacks, Latinos, and gays  (Read 26247 times)
traininthedistance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,547


« on: November 13, 2012, 11:13:59 AM »

Votes they once were able to attract ...

^ Votes we were once able to attract?

 The last time Republicans were able to attract black voters, Civil War veterans were still walking on the Earth. Even Reagan and Nixon, when they winning 49 states, struggled to get 10% of the black vote.

Blacks will never vote Republican in our lifetime. These are not votes that could be ours.

A sizable number of Blacks voted Republican for Eisenhower, it was only after that the bottom fell out.  The tide started turning with the Great Migration, where the black community was introduced to the newer, Northern wing of the Democrats, which had started to grow in inner-city poor ethnic communities and was about social spending and acceptance of marginalized groups rather than racism.  (Basically, the Al Smith wing rather than the James Cox wing, if you will.  They were united in opposition to the hegemonic "mainstream" of wealthy industrialists and Yankee farmers, and that was pretty much the main thing keeping them under the same Democratic name.)  So inner-city Northern blacks were more receptive to the Democrats' economic message, and started to push for civil rights within a party that was rapidly changing for the better.  Obviously, then it took 1964 for the switch to be complete and for blacks to be so solidly Dem.  
Logged
traininthedistance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,547


« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2012, 11:21:49 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Because the Party of Slavery is desperately trying to cover up the truth.

Probably the only Democrat left who can be considered to be a member of the "Party of Slavery" now is Joe Manchin.  Besides him, the ideological re-sorting which began with the urban Dems' nomination of Al Smith, reached its climax with the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the ensuing "Southern Strategy", and mostly resolved itself in the wave of 1994, has finally come to an end.

Sorry, things have flipped completely and the Republicans are now the defenders of that odious legacy.  The Democrats abandoned it, and you folks rushed in to fill the gap.
Logged
traininthedistance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,547


« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2012, 11:24:17 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Actually I was thinking more along the lines of George Wallace (D).

I have absolutely zero doubt he'd be a Republican if he was alive today.  Heck, he'd be a Republican twenty years ago.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.