Do the rich and powerful "own" both parties?

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Which one opposes staying in Afghanistan? Which one will actually balance the budget? Which one actually supports gay marriage (not this states decide stuff)?

Democrats. And they'd do the other stuff too, if they weren't spineless cowards.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Which one opposes staying in Afghanistan? Which one will actually balance the budget? Which one actually supports gay marriage (not this states decide stuff)?

Democrats. And they'd do the other stuff too, if they weren't spineless cowards.

We're still in Afghanistan, we still have trillion-dollar-deficits, and

Which one actually supports gay marriage (not this states decide stuff)?

[/quote]
We're on track to leave Afghanistan, which Bush didn't do, and may I remind you that the last president to balance the budget was Clinton?

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

And that's of course the main reason Republicans are after unions. Given the Bush Presidency, we know for a fact they don't care about budget deficits or whatever they claim. This is about crippling the opposition and their ability to compete in elections.

So because the Bush administration created billion dollar deficits that means every Republican in Washington wants to Govern that way? That seems like a big generalization considering most Republicans I've seen hated the way Bush ran the country. I don't know if you realize this but there were Republicans before Bush took office who've been preaching about deficits and fiscal restrain years before Bush stared running up deficits. You can't generalize how every person in a party would handle the econemy based on on the Bush administration.

Look at every major Republican candidate except Paul. Their plans would balloon the deficit.