Pro-public health groups outspending the other side 5:1 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 05:19:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Pro-public health groups outspending the other side 5:1 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Pro-public health groups outspending the other side 5:1  (Read 783 times)
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35
« on: August 21, 2009, 02:28:57 AM »
It should cost more to educate rather than throw mud, correct? Silver had a post about this topic yesterday.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2009, 11:10:42 AM »
It's no surprise that Big Pharma is supporting a public option; they stand to gain millions of new customers for their drugs on the government's dime.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2009, 04:29:39 PM »
Quote from: Karma Police on August 21, 2009, 02:18:19 PM
Quote from: Jake on August 21, 2009, 11:10:42 AM
It's no surprise that Big Pharma is supporting a public option; they stand to gain millions of new customers for their drugs on the government's dime.
Eh Big Pharma is one of the least benefiting groups from a public option imo.

That's a pretty worthless comment if you don't expand on it. Least benefiting of all groups in existence? Of corporate sectors?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.