Hubert Humphrey wins in 1968, running for re-election in 1972 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 02:20:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Hubert Humphrey wins in 1968, running for re-election in 1972 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would you vote for, 1972?
#1
Humphrey (D-MN)/Muskie (D-ME) (Inc)
 
#2
Reagan (R-CA)/Dole (R-KS)
 
#3
Independent candidate
 
#4
Wouldn't vote
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 101

Author Topic: Hubert Humphrey wins in 1968, running for re-election in 1972  (Read 10416 times)
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
United States


« on: May 12, 2015, 09:38:02 PM »

Voters would have been ready for change by 1972:


Humphrey 94 EV / 43%
Reagan 444 EV / 55%

(I know, the map looks funny with WV red and MD blue)
Logged
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2015, 07:46:54 PM »

Voters would have been ready for change by 1972:


Humphrey 94 EV / 43%
Reagan 444 EV / 55%

(I know, the map looks funny with WV red and MD blue)

I doubt this map would even be close to accurate if HHH accomplished the end of the war and the economy stayed roughly the same as it did IRL.
I hope so, but racial unrest might have increased (as much as I would like to think the contrary) and HHH might be blamed for higher unemployment (5.6% in '72 vs 3.5% in '68). Especially if HHH advocated for busing (as my AP History teacher thought he would), he would have lost Macomb County, Michigan, and the nation.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 11 queries.