SENATE BILL: Pacific Emergency Stimulus (Law'd)

[Sec. of State Superique]

The economic problems in the Pacific can be attributed to the fact that the region has not had a really stable government for a long period of time. The Pacific has already received a lot of money without any visible effects so this seems like a waste of money to me. Also, if Nyman can afford to spend such a high sum I would expect other regions to receive money as well.

This looks like Angela Merkel standing up in the European Council and saying "Hey guys I want some billion euros for me too!".

[Sec. of State Superique]

I'm glad that I'm a synonym for SoIA. Anyway, I was thinking about a three member committee to approve the stimulus for each region formed by me, one guy appointed by the regional executives and another appointed by the Senators....

[Sec. of State Superique]

Could you answer me a doubt? What does HSR really stand for, folks?

[Sec. of State Superique]

I would like to remember you guys that despite that not being booked in our budget, as SoIA, I've activated the SEDZI Act and we are currently supplying the Pacfic with more than 65 billion according to previous GM Griffin Estimates.

[Sec. of State Superique]

I would like to remember you guys that despite that not being booked in our budget, as SoIA, I've activated the SEDZI Act and we are currently supplying the Pacfic with more than 65 billion according to previous GM Griffin Estimates.

What? I don't think the Pacific meets all of the requirements to become a SEDZ.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

#3 is relevant here. I don't think that the median income (per capita, I assume) is lower than $21,000.

Well, I'm considering my estimates that I got from Griffin, those zones are determined by a local level, cities actually, and they are already in place. The cap you've mentioned is not regional based, it's only a local cap.

[Sec. of State Superique]

If there is already 65 billion going into the region, the size of the bailout included in this legislation needs to be dramatically reduced.

I could just de-activate the SEDZI...

[Sec. of State Superique]

I agree with President Duke, as I am not at all sure that the SEDZI should even be applied that way.

The text allows me to use it until 2015...

[Sec. of State Superique]

I agree with President Duke, as I am not at all sure that the SEDZI should even be applied that way.

The text allows me to use it until 2015...

True, but I think that if this has been on the books for 3.5 years now, and there has been little to no ostensible unemployment impact, we should probably be looking elsewhere. Presumably, the SEDZs have already been in effect, no?

The text requires SoIA Action and I didn't find anything saying that the SEDZI was happening, we could end with this bill all together but all of this leads to me thinking that the GMs are being "kind" to the Pacfic. We are not Somalia creating Special Zones, we are a High-Tech Argentina, so unemployment should have been smaller. Even so, I believe that this new law will be far more efficient than the SEDZI to solve Pacifican Problems!