I definitely support the merits of Section 2 but I think the time frame is unreasonable given the scale of the project.
Background:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304319804576389601079728920https://mobile.twitter.com/CrimeADayAdditionally, I think Section 3 is more or less already law.
Under DOJ, there is Community Relations Services (community outreach and policing), Office of Justice Programs/Bureau of Justice Assistance (community policing and recidivism reduction), Office of Juvenile Justice and delinquency prevention (recidivism reduction), Parole Commission (Parole and reentry), National Institute of Justice (recidivism reduction).
The Courts themselves run Probation and Pretrial services (probation and prisoner reentry).
Basically the only unspoken for bullet point is "bail" which could itself be reformed by Congress without a new bureaucracy. In fact, a good compromise might be to consolidate the above duplicative/fragmented agencies into one single agency called the Community Division which would likely save budget money through greater efficiencies.
And in Section 7, the federal government lacks the power to require States/regions to create bureaucracies as per
Printz v. US. Considering Lincoln is the only Region with a traditional cash bail system anyway, I'd say lobbying would be more effective in convincing Lincoln than an unconstitutional mandate.
