Opinion of pornography (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 09:30:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Opinion of pornography (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What is your opinion?
#1
freedom entertainment
 
#2
horrible entertainment
 
#3
sinful entertainment
 
#4
what is a porn???
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 94

Author Topic: Opinion of pornography  (Read 23409 times)
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« on: December 17, 2012, 02:53:07 PM »

There's nothing inherently wrong with porn, but 99% of the porn out there today definitely falls into category 2.
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2012, 04:54:49 PM »


How do you have 30gb of porn? Like, how would you even watch all that? Are you masturbating seven times a day or something?
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2012, 05:07:33 PM »


How do you have 30gb of porn? Like, how would you even watch all that? Are you masturbating seven times a day or something?

turns out it is actually 54.5gb.  most of it is from a single massive torrent siterip of a performer I am fond of, 80% it I have not watched.

That answer was a lot better than I was expecting.
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2012, 06:36:16 PM »
« Edited: December 17, 2012, 07:32:57 PM by drj101 »

Is it all that different, though? Isn't humiliation the central dimension of pornography?

No, I think vagina is the central dimension of pornography.  

Except gay male porn ;p
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2012, 08:24:41 PM »

belgian was playing to his inner Zizek, (all of our inner Zizek), ya'll aren't getting it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5yoqjABeBM
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2012, 02:37:44 PM »

Freedom, I guess, but also dangerous. Not physically of course (hopefully), but I've heard a few stories of guys getting too addicted to it and only being able to get off to it, even when engaging with other people.

Neutral entertainment. Useful when it's needed, but one can't help but feel a bit of shame afterwards.

Not shame, more like "I can't believe I just got off to that..."

Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2012, 09:01:52 PM »

there is some question as to whether compulsive use of pornography functions as an addiction (see drug use) or as an impulse-control disorder (see compulsive handwashing).

Regardless of the mental mechanism, I think we can agree that porn has a higher chance of being addicting/compulsive than hand washing.

Which doesn't necessarily make it bad, just like how alcoholics don't mean that alcohol is evil and we should go back to prohibition. But it does make the case for moderation. Everything in moderation is a good motto Smiley
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2012, 06:48:43 PM »

there is some question as to whether compulsive use of pornography functions as an addiction (see drug use) or as an impulse-control disorder (see compulsive handwashing).

The real reason for this isn't anything particularly attractive about pornography, it is that there is something wrong with a society in which it is so difficult for so many males to get sexual intercourse.

True.

I blame Disney movies.  They make every little girl in this country think she's some perfect princess that has to wait for frickin' Prince Charming to come along until she gives herself up.  If we just told them they are decaying bags of meat like everybody else we'd all be getting it in a lot more. 

The attitude expressed in this post contributes far more to you not getting laid than Disney does.
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


« Reply #8 on: December 23, 2012, 11:20:25 PM »

It would be a boon to the people in this world who don't fit into such execrable construct, who outnumber and are as a group morally superior (since undeservedly oppressed, which can be redemptive) to those who do. This particular sort of slavering, bestial sexuality really isn't all that important to most people, or if it is it is so for all the wrong reasons.

Speak for yourself!

I really don't think heterosexual male sexuality as folks like you express it is terribly important in a positive way for most people, unless non-heterosexual-males are discounted as people.


Nathan basically has you in a statistical trap there Opebo. Since heterosexual men are obviously a minority, by definition "most people" don't have hetero male sexuality. The more interesting question is whether most hetero men have the particular type of sexuality in question here. That's not an easy question to answer and the validity of any results depend on to what extent cultural factors can influence someone's sexuality. I am 99% certain that the number of men who are sexual in the way that Opebo and others are describing in this thread is less than usually portrayed in pop culture though.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 14 queries.