Hillary buried under avalanche of new evidence

[Meclazine for Israel]

"Americans who lived through the nightmares of both the Watergate and Lewinsky scandals recall vividly how every day seemed to produce new evidence of wrongdoing. The drip, drip of deceptions and lies finally overflowed into a cascading pool of criminality and disgust....."

Uh oh.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/11/03/gregg-jarrett-avalanche-evidence-may-now-bury-hillary.html

Hillary might be in trouble here and sinking fast.

Oh wait a sec.....it's a Fox News story.

[Devout Centrist]

It's an opinion piece by a hack fraud con man no less.

[Lyin' Steve]

So in the opinion of a Republican hack who works for Fox News, which made its name finding Clinton scandals every other day in the 90s, people don't like Hillary because there's too many scandals?  Wow!

[Maxwell]

in the first sentence he compared Watergate and Lewinsky scandals. he's a moron.

[ProudModerate2]

Oh brother ...

[Person Man]

If they don't get their oppo dump in the next 24 hours, they will have another 35064 hours to do it.

[Hermit For Peace]

Hillary will prevail. She is not the crooked evil liar that her detractors make her out to be.

Why they hate her so much is because they FEAR her power. Such a powerful woman is downright scary to some people.

They also feared Bill Clinton's power. Both Hillary and Bill are very intelligent people who have a lot on the ball, and that just galls some small people.

But if you look at the evidence, both of them have contributed much to our society in many ways, on many levels, and both of them are still contributing.

They deserve accolades for all they've given.

[Erich Maria Remarque]

If you don't believe hermit, ask Monica. She will tell you how Clinton used power and contributed his Weiner "in many ways".

According to Powell's emails, he is still contributing.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

No, thanks.

[Hermit For Peace]

If you don't believe hermit, ask Monica. She will tell you how Clinton used power and contributed his Weiner "in many ways".

According to Powell's emails, he is still contributing.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

No, thanks.

I can't deny that many men -- including Trump -- are sometimes guided with the brain that sits below their belt....and that's just how it is.

But you can't throw the baby out with the bath water. Bill Clinton was President for 8 years and he did a lot of good for this country. And he also did a lot of good with his Foundation.

You can overlook the good stuff of which there are volumes, or you can focus on one aspect of his life that is less than exemplary. But Hillary forgave him and they moved on with their lives, and so should you.

I still like Bill Clinton, and I also like Hillary. I think they are good people, neither of whom are perfect. But then, neither is anyone else on the face of the planet.

[Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries]

If you don't believe hermit, ask Monica. She will tell you how Clinton used power and contributed his Weiner "in many ways".

According to Powell's emails, he is still contributing.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

No, thanks.

I can't deny that many men -- including Trump -- are sometimes guided with the brain that sits below their belt....and that's just how it is.

But you can't throw the baby out with the bath water. Bill Clinton was President for 8 years and he did a lot of good for this country. And he also did a lot of good with his Foundation.

You can overlook the good stuff of which there are volumes, or you can focus on one aspect of his life that is less than exemplary. But Hillary forgave him and they moved on with their lives, and so should you.

I still like Bill Clinton, and I also like Hillary. I think they are good people, neither of whom are perfect. But then, neither is anyone else on the face of the planet.

But you are right, Hermit.  People fear Hillary's power.  Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey feared Hillary's power.  They fear it today.

It was bad enough to be sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton.  But after the assaults came the active campaigns of defamation and discrediting, led by Hillary Clinton.  Someone who'd been done dirty (on the face of things) by Bill is the person skewering their reputations, providing the intimidation, the "nuts and sluts" campaign.  Someone backed by the muscle of the Executive Branch of government.  I kind of understand why they're not as forgiving as Hillary.

This is the kind of power-monger Hillary Clinton is.  She'll trash folks Bill screwed over (literally, in this case) so she can have HER power.  Ask Bernie Sanders.  Ask the folks at the White House Travel Office.  The list goes on.  Bill lacks sexual self-control, but Hillary lacks any real empathy for others.  She's all about herself, her ambitions, her desire for recognition, and her desire to prove that whatever Bill can do, she can do better.

For those who think it's important that the "glass ceiling" be shattered, there were, and are, a number of excellent female Presidential candidates.  For the Democrats, there are Sens. Murray, Stabenow, Klobuchar (my fave), and McCaskill, all of whom would be eminently electable, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who's probably not electable, but highly capable.  For the GOP, there's Sen. Susan Collins, former Sec. of State Condeleeza Rice, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Gov. Nikki Haley.  So why her?  Why does a party push the opposition to the bench to make way for a candidate under FBI investigation just because she's a woman?

[Xing]

Just five more days of this BS, and it'll all be over. No more people opting to consume radioactive waste because it's still more palatable than those awful brussel sprouts . No more people arguing that sticking a chainsaw up your ass is still better than going to the dentist, because going to the dentist is literally that terrible.

[Ronnie]

Fox is just throwing everything at the wall and seeing what sticks.  All they're doing is embarrassing themselves.

[wolfsblood07]

So in the opinion of a Republican hack who works for Fox News, which made its name finding Clinton scandals every other day in the 90s, people don't like Hillary because there's too many scandals?  Wow!

Well it wasn't hard to find those scandals in the 90s, even if they didn't want to find them. 

[Hermit For Peace]

But you are right, Hermit.  People fear Hillary's power.  Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey feared Hillary's power.  They fear it today.

It was bad enough to be sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton.  But after the assaults came the active campaigns of defamation and discrediting, led by Hillary Clinton.  Someone who'd been done dirty (on the face of things) by Bill is the person skewering their reputations, providing the intimidation, the "nuts and sluts" campaign.  Someone backed by the muscle of the Executive Branch of government.  I kind of understand why they're not as forgiving as Hillary.

This is the kind of power-monger Hillary Clinton is.  She'll trash folks Bill screwed over (literally, in this case) so she can have HER power.  Ask Bernie Sanders.  Ask the folks at the White House Travel Office.  The list goes on.  Bill lacks sexual self-control, but Hillary lacks any real empathy for others.  She's all about herself, her ambitions, her desire for recognition, and her desire to prove that whatever Bill can do, she can do better.

For those who think it's important that the "glass ceiling" be shattered, there were, and are, a number of excellent female Presidential candidates.  For the Democrats, there are Sens. Murray, Stabenow, Klobuchar (my fave), and McCaskill, all of whom would be eminently electable, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who's probably not electable, but highly capable.  For the GOP, there's Sen. Susan Collins, former Sec. of State Condeleeza Rice, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Gov. Nikki Haley.  So why her?  Why does a party push the opposition to the bench to make way for a candidate under FBI investigation just because she's a woman?

I can't even begin to answer your post, so I'll leave you with a reality check.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/11/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-bill-clinton-accusers/index.html

[‼realJohnEwards‼]

But you are right, Hermit.  People fear Hillary's power.  Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey feared Hillary's power.  They fear it today.

It was bad enough to be sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton.  But after the assaults came the active campaigns of defamation and discrediting, led by Hillary Clinton.  Someone who'd been done dirty (on the face of things) by Bill is the person skewering their reputations, providing the intimidation, the "nuts and sluts" campaign.  Someone backed by the muscle of the Executive Branch of government.  I kind of understand why they're not as forgiving as Hillary.

This is the kind of power-monger Hillary Clinton is.  She'll trash folks Bill screwed over (literally, in this case) so she can have HER power.  Ask Bernie Sanders.  Ask the folks at the White House Travel Office.  The list goes on.  Bill lacks sexual self-control, but Hillary lacks any real empathy for others.  She's all about herself, her ambitions, her desire for recognition, and her desire to prove that whatever Bill can do, she can do better.

For those who think it's important that the "glass ceiling" be shattered, there were, and are, a number of excellent female Presidential candidates.  For the Democrats, there are Sens. Murray, Stabenow, Klobuchar (my fave), and McCaskill, all of whom would be eminently electable, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who's probably not electable, but highly capable.  For the GOP, there's Sen. Susan Collins, former Sec. of State Condeleeza Rice, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Gov. Nikki Haley.  So why her?  Why does a party push the opposition to the bench to make way for a candidate under FBI investigation just because she's a woman?

I can't even begin to answer your post, so I'll leave you with a reality check.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/11/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-bill-clinton-accusers/index.html

Oh, but you know, it's from CNN, and when Fuzzy Bear doesn't want his worldview challenged he resorts to his safe space in Breitbart

[rafta_rafta]

This story is literally a game of chinese whispers being played by some field agents and ex FBI officers through damaging false leaks to the media.