HB 19-37: Consolidation Prevention Act of 2019 (Passed)

[YE]

A BILL

To amend the Clayton Act to modify the standard for an unlawful acquisition.

Section 1: Short title

This Act may be cited as the “Consolidation Prevention Act of 2019”.

Section 2: Unlawful aquistions

Section 7 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 18) is amended—

(1) in the first and second undesignated paragraphs, by striking “substantially” each place that term appears and inserting “materially”;

(2) by inserting “or a monopsony” after “monopoly” each place that term appears; and

(3) by adding at the end the following:

“ In a case brought by the United States, the Federal Trade Commission, or a State attorney general, a court shall determine that the effect of an acquisition described in this section may be materially to lessen competition or create a monopoly or a monopsony if—

“(1) the acquisition would lead to a significant increase in market concentration in any line of commerce or in any activity affecting commerce in any section of the country; or

“(2) (A) the acquisition is not a transaction that is described in section 7A(c); and

“(B) (i) as a result of such acquisition, the acquiring person would hold an aggregate total amount of the voting securities and assets of the acquired person in excess of $5,000,000,000 (as adjusted and published for each fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2020, in the same manner as provided in section 8(a)(5) to reflect the percentage change in the gross national product for such fiscal year compared to the gross national product for the year ending September 30, 2019); or

“(ii) (I) the person acquiring or the person being acquired has assets, net annual sales, or a market capitalization greater than $100,000,000,000 (as so adjusted and published); and

“(II) as a result of such acquisition, the acquiring person would hold an aggregate total amount of the voting securities and assets of the acquired person in excess of $50,000,000 (as so adjusted and published),
unless the acquiring and acquired person establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the effect of the acquisition will not be to tend to materially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly or a monopsony. In this paragraph, the term ‘materially lessen competition’ means more than a de minimis amount.”.

Section 3: Post-settlement data.

Section 7A of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 18a) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(l) (1) Each person who enters into an agreement with the Federal Trade Commission or Atlasia to resolve a proceeding brought under the antitrust laws or under the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) regarding an acquisition with respect to which notification is required under this section shall, on an annual basis during the 5-year period beginning on the date on which the agreement is entered into, submit to the Federal Trade Commission or the Assistant Attorney General, as applicable, information sufficient for the Federal Trade Commission or Atlasia, as applicable, to assess the competitive impact of the acquisition, including—

“(A) the pricing, availability, and quality of any product or service, or inputs thereto, in any market, that was covered by the agreement;

“(B) the source, and the resulting magnitude and extent, of any cost-saving efficiencies or any consumer benefits that were claimed as a benefit of the acquisition and the extent to which any cost savings were passed on to consumers; and

“(C) the effectiveness of any divestitures or any conditions placed on the acquisition in preventing or mitigating harm to competition.

“(2) The requirement to provide the information described in paragraph (1) shall be included in an agreement described in that paragraph.

“(3) The Federal Trade Commission, with the concurrence of the Assistant Attorney General, by rule in accordance with section 553 of title 5, United States Code, and consistent with the purposes of this section—

“(A) shall require that the information described in paragraph (1) be in such form and contain such documentary material and information relevant to a proposed acquisition as is necessary and appropriate to enable the Federal Trade Commission and the Assistant Attorney General to assess the competitive impact of the acquisition under paragraph (1); and

“(B) may—

“(i) define the terms used in this subsection;

“(ii) exempt, from the requirements of this section, information not relevant in assessing the competitive impact of the acquisition under paragraph (1); and

“(iii) prescribe such other rules as may be necessary and appropriate to carry out the purposes of this section.”

Section 4: Implementation

This law goes into effect on October 1, 2019.

Sponsor: YE
72 hours to debate.

[YE]

This is largely taken (although certain parts were removed) from an Amy Klobuchar Senate bill.

This does two main things, unless I'm horribly mistaken.

1. Makes it easier to be argued that consolidation, depending on the monetary criteria outlined above, is unlawful
2. In an event of a FTC settlement, the settled party must provide information on its workings.

[YE]

Amendment:

A BILL

To amend the Clayton Act to modify the standard for an unlawful acquisition.

Section 1: Short title

This Act may be cited as the “Consolidation Prevention Act of 2019”.

Section 2: Unlawful acquisitions

Section 7 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 18) is amended—

(1) in the first and second undesignated paragraphs, by striking “substantially” each place that term appears and inserting “materially”;

(2) by inserting “or a monopsony” after “monopoly” each place that term appears; and

(3) by adding at the end the following:

“ In a case brought by the United States Atlasia, the Federal Trade Commission, or a State attorney general, a court shall determine that the effect of an acquisition described in this section may be materially to lessen competition or create a monopoly or a monopsony if—

“(1) the acquisition would lead to a significant increase in market concentration in any line of commerce or in any activity affecting commerce in any section of the country; or

“(2) (A) the acquisition is not a transaction that is described in section 7A(c); and

“(B) (i) as a result of such acquisition, the acquiring person would hold an aggregate total amount of the voting securities and assets of the acquired person in excess of $5,000,000,000 (as adjusted and published for each fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2020, in the same manner as provided in section 8(a)(5) to reflect the percentage change in the gross national product for such fiscal year compared to the gross national product for the year ending September 30, 2019); or

“(ii) (I) the person acquiring or the person being acquired has assets, net annual sales, or a market capitalization greater than $100,000,000,000 (as so adjusted and published); and

“(II) as a result of such acquisition, the acquiring person would hold an aggregate total amount of the voting securities and assets of the acquired person in excess of $50,000,000 (as so adjusted and published),
unless the acquiring and acquired person establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the effect of the acquisition will not be to tend to materially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly or a monopsony. In this paragraph, the term ‘materially lessen competition’ means more than a de minimis amount.”.

Section 3: Post-settlement data.

Section 7A of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 18a) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(l) (1) Each person who enters into an agreement with the Federal Trade Commission or Atlasia to resolve a proceeding brought under the antitrust laws or under the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) regarding an acquisition with respect to which notification is required under this section shall, on an annual basis during the 5-year period beginning on the date on which the agreement is entered into, submit to the Federal Trade Commission or the Assistant Deputy Attorney General, as applicable, information sufficient for the Federal Trade Commission or Atlasia, as applicable, to assess the competitive impact of the acquisition, including—

“(A) the pricing, availability, and quality of any product or service, or inputs thereto, in any market, that was covered by the agreement;

“(B) the source, and the resulting magnitude and extent, of any cost-saving efficiencies or any consumer benefits that were claimed as a benefit of the acquisition and the extent to which any cost savings were passed on to consumers; and

“(C) the effectiveness of any divestitures or any conditions placed on the acquisition in preventing or mitigating harm to competition.

“(2) The requirement to provide the information described in paragraph (1) shall be included in an agreement described in that paragraph.

“(3) The Federal Trade Commission, with the concurrence of the Assistant Attorney General, by rule in accordance with section 553 of title 5, United States Code, and consistent with the purposes of this section—

“(A) shall require that the information described in paragraph (1) be in such form and contain such documentary material and information relevant to a proposed acquisition as is necessary and appropriate to enable the Federal Trade Commission and the Assistant Attorney General to assess the competitive impact of the acquisition under paragraph (1); and

“(B) may—

“(i) define the terms used in this subsection;

“(ii) exempt, from the requirements of this section, information not relevant in assessing the competitive impact of the acquisition under paragraph (1); and

“(iii) prescribe such other rules as may be necessary and appropriate to carry out the purposes of this section.”

Section 4: Implementation

This law goes into effect on October 1, 2019.

Mostly cleanup to Atlasiafy everything.

24 hours to object.

[YE]

Amendment is adopted.

[Dr. MB]

Looks like a great bill.

[Dr. MB]

Anything else to say?

[Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Motioning for a final vote as we are basically at the 168 hour point on this.

[YE]

24 (now less) to object.

[YE]

A final vote is now open. 72 hours to vote.

[YE]

Aye

[Dr. MB]

Aye

[Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Aye

[JGibson]

AYE

[P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong]

Aye

[fhtagn]

Abstain.

[Coastal Elitist]

Aye

[alancia]

Aye

[YE]

Oh sh**t, this too. This has passed, I'll certify when I type up a new bill to take this slot (and probably when I do my next round of updates), but I am going to bed now. What an evening.

[YE]

A BILL

To amend the Clayton Act to modify the standard for an unlawful acquisition.

Section 1: Short title

This Act may be cited as the “Consolidation Prevention Act of 2019”.

Section 2: Unlawful acquisitions

Section 7 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 18) is amended—

(1) in the first and second undesignated paragraphs, by striking “substantially” each place that term appears and inserting “materially”;

(2) by inserting “or a monopsony” after “monopoly” each place that term appears; and

(3) by adding at the end the following:

“ In a case brought by the United States Atlasia, the Federal Trade Commission, or a State attorney general, a court shall determine that the effect of an acquisition described in this section may be materially to lessen competition or create a monopoly or a monopsony if—

“(1) the acquisition would lead to a significant increase in market concentration in any line of commerce or in any activity affecting commerce in any section of the country; or

“(2) (A) the acquisition is not a transaction that is described in section 7A(c); and

“(B) (i) as a result of such acquisition, the acquiring person would hold an aggregate total amount of the voting securities and assets of the acquired person in excess of $5,000,000,000 (as adjusted and published for each fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2020, in the same manner as provided in section 8(a)(5) to reflect the percentage change in the gross national product for such fiscal year compared to the gross national product for the year ending September 30, 2019); or

“(ii) (I) the person acquiring or the person being acquired has assets, net annual sales, or a market capitalization greater than $100,000,000,000 (as so adjusted and published); and

“(II) as a result of such acquisition, the acquiring person would hold an aggregate total amount of the voting securities and assets of the acquired person in excess of $50,000,000 (as so adjusted and published),
unless the acquiring and acquired person establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the effect of the acquisition will not be to tend to materially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly or a monopsony. In this paragraph, the term ‘materially lessen competition’ means more than a de minimis amount.”.

Section 3: Post-settlement data.

Section 7A of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 18a) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(l) (1) Each person who enters into an agreement with the Federal Trade Commission or Atlasia to resolve a proceeding brought under the antitrust laws or under the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) regarding an acquisition with respect to which notification is required under this section shall, on an annual basis during the 5-year period beginning on the date on which the agreement is entered into, submit to the Federal Trade Commission or the Assistant Deputy Attorney General, as applicable, information sufficient for the Federal Trade Commission or Atlasia, as applicable, to assess the competitive impact of the acquisition, including—

“(A) the pricing, availability, and quality of any product or service, or inputs thereto, in any market, that was covered by the agreement;

“(B) the source, and the resulting magnitude and extent, of any cost-saving efficiencies or any consumer benefits that were claimed as a benefit of the acquisition and the extent to which any cost savings were passed on to consumers; and

“(C) the effectiveness of any divestitures or any conditions placed on the acquisition in preventing or mitigating harm to competition.

“(2) The requirement to provide the information described in paragraph (1) shall be included in an agreement described in that paragraph.

“(3) The Federal Trade Commission, with the concurrence of the Assistant Attorney General, by rule in accordance with section 553 of title 5, United States Code, and consistent with the purposes of this section—

“(A) shall require that the information described in paragraph (1) be in such form and contain such documentary material and information relevant to a proposed acquisition as is necessary and appropriate to enable the Federal Trade Commission and the Assistant Attorney General to assess the competitive impact of the acquisition under paragraph (1); and

“(B) may—

“(i) define the terms used in this subsection;

“(ii) exempt, from the requirements of this section, information not relevant in assessing the competitive impact of the acquisition under paragraph (1); and

“(iii) prescribe such other rules as may be necessary and appropriate to carry out the purposes of this section.”

Section 4: Implementation

This law goes into effect on October 1, 2019.

House of Representatives
Passed in the House of Representatives 7-0-1-0
X YE