How realistic are these February results?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 04:29:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  How realistic are these February results?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How realistic are these February results?  (Read 355 times)
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,053
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 07, 2019, 09:43:36 AM »

IA
✓ Pete Buttigieg: 26%
Elizabeth Warren: 24%
Joe Biden: 17%
Bernie Sanders: 15%
Amy Klobuchar: 6%


NH
✓ Elizabeth Warren: 24%
Pete Buttigieg: 23%
Bernie Sanders: 17%
Joe Biden: 14%
Amy Klobuchar: 5%


NV
✓ Bernie Sanders: 23%
Elizabeth Warren: 22%
Joe Biden: 21%
Pete Buttigieg: 13%
Kamala Harris: 5%


SC
✓ Joe Biden: 31%
Elizabeth Warren: 23%
Bernie Sanders: 19%
Kamala Harris: 8%
Pete Buttigieg: 7%


I think something like this can actually happen. Sanders and Biden both barely survive into March, but neither of them would be favored for the nomination.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2019, 10:02:33 AM »

I don’t think Biden and Sanders would be as strong going into NV, having come in third and fourth in IA and NH. Buttigieg would also probably do better than that in NV and SC after winning IA and coming in second in NH.
Logged
Cinemark
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 870


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2019, 10:14:09 AM »
« Edited: November 07, 2019, 10:19:38 AM by #Klobmentum »

That would be an actual nightmare.

Edit: What I mean by that is that these results show democrats are in for a long, arduous primary season that might not be settled till the convention.
Logged
LiberalDem19
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 486


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2019, 12:35:02 PM »

If Kamala Harris fails to break into the top 5 in Iowa she's dropping before Nevada.
There's a reason why she laid off her New Hampshire staff and is going all in on Iowa.

If Biden does that poorly in Iowa and New Hampshire, his air of electability is gonna wear off fast. Remember what hurt Hillary in 2008 was not that Obama won Iowa, but that she got beaten by John Edwards.
Logged
John Dule
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,491
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.57, S: -7.50

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2019, 03:22:11 PM »

Yeah, Kamala would not stick around in this scenario. Other than that, this is possible by the slimmest of margins, I suppose.
Logged
redeagleofficial
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 657


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2019, 04:14:15 PM »

IA
✓ Pete Buttigieg: 26%
Elizabeth Warren: 24%
Joe Biden: 17%
Bernie Sanders: 15%
Amy Klobuchar: 6%


NH
✓ Elizabeth Warren: 24%
Pete Buttigieg: 23%
Bernie Sanders: 17%
Joe Biden: 14%
Amy Klobuchar: 5%


NV
✓ Bernie Sanders: 23%
Elizabeth Warren: 22%
Joe Biden: 21%
Pete Buttigieg: 13%
Kamala Harris: 5%


SC
✓ Joe Biden: 31%
Elizabeth Warren: 23%
Bernie Sanders: 19%
Kamala Harris: 8%
Pete Buttigieg: 7%


I think something like this can actually happen. Sanders and Biden both barely survive into March, but neither of them would be favored for the nomination.

Plausible minus Klobuchar
Logged
W
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,297
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.71, S: -8.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2019, 04:53:42 PM »

Swap Bernie and Buttigieg in New Hampshire and yes.
Logged
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,266


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2019, 06:59:18 PM »

Unrealistic. Biden will come either second or first in Nevada and he will definitely win South Carolina by at least 10 percentage points.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2019, 07:26:40 PM »

Not very. In particular, I don't see Sanders being very likely to win Nevada. That primary will go to either Biden or Warren.

Iowa meanwhile is probably going to be won by Warren.

New Hampshire and South Carolina look somewhat accurate though.

I too would shudder at seeing the first four states be won by four different candidates though.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.23 seconds with 13 queries.