Paul McCartney in Red Square
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 12:52:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Paul McCartney in Red Square
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Did the Beatles bring down communism in the USSR?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 13

Author Topic: Paul McCartney in Red Square  (Read 1996 times)
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 13, 2005, 11:29:14 PM »

I just happened to catch “Paul McCartney in Red Square” on the A&E channel. It was taped in 2003 so probably some of you have seen it before but it was the first time for me. McCartney’s face has aged but his talent hasn’t. He was just as good as he was four decades ago. But I was surprised at the sight of Red Square filled with thousands of young and middle aged Russians all moving and clapping to the beat of the old Beatles tunes. They were just as excited to be there as any American audience would be. And yes they really went nuts for “Back in the USSR”.

What really amazed me were the interviews with middle aged Russians about the influence of the Beatles on the Soviet youth of the 60s. Although the communists discouraged listening to Rock and Roll they couldn’t stop it. And it seems the Beatles had the same effect on the Russian kids that they had on young people everywhere. Every one of the Russians interviewed felt that the Beatles sparked a cultural revolution and created a desire for freedom that played a role in the downfall of communism in the USSR. Even Putin said that when he was young the Beatles music was like an open window to the world.

Did the Beatles really help to bring down communism in the USSR? Could it be that the Soviet people were influenced more by Lennon than by Lenin? What do you think?
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2005, 12:29:35 AM »

I voted yes. Better that the Beatles get credit then that octogenarian Fascist who usually gets undue credit for defeating communism.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,040
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2005, 11:27:11 AM »

I voted yes. Better that the Beatles get credit then that octogenarian Fascist who usually gets undue credit for defeating communism.

My sentiments exactly Cheesy Besides, the Beatles were "bigger than Jesus"
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2005, 01:00:48 PM »

Until I saw that video I would have said no, but after listening to the Middle aged Russians talk about it I would have to say that it might have been a factor.

By the way , are you calling Reagan a fascist? My definition of facist would be a dictator who rules by brutal force. Maybe you don't agree with his politics but I see no evidence of fascism, by my definition.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,915
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2005, 01:07:12 PM »

The U.S.S.R collapsed because it was always going to
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2005, 03:24:27 PM »

The U.S.S.R collapsed because it was always going to

I think that's true. As you know I believe that communism is fundamentally flawed and will always collapse but at the same time I think maybe the Beatles offered the Soviet people a glimpse of life in a free country which was very appealing to them.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2005, 03:29:49 PM »

I think the USSR was brought down by that first S.
Logged
Machiavelli
Rookie
**
Posts: 100


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2005, 06:08:11 PM »

I think the USSR was brought down by that first S.

Soviet?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2005, 06:25:47 PM »

You mean McCartney was in a group before Wings?
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2005, 07:08:32 PM »


I thought it was Union of Socialist Soviet Republics. Make it second S, then.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2005, 08:26:24 PM »


I thought it was Union of Socialist Soviet Republics. Make it second S, then.

It's the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, so yes.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 15, 2005, 11:35:24 PM »

Until I saw that video I would have said no, but after listening to the Middle aged Russians talk about it I would have to say that it might have been a factor.

By the way , are you calling Reagan a fascist? My definition of facist would be a dictator who rules by brutal force. Maybe you don't agree with his politics but I see no evidence of fascism, by my definition.

His economic policies were fascist, in that they were for further corporate control and a weakening of state control. I wish conservatives would stop associating the word fascist with the Nazis, there are other examples of that system. Reagan's presidency, while officially a democracy, resulted in a massive shift towards the right on the political spectrum on all issues he confronted, and that means a move towards fascist economics.
Logged
patrick1
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 16, 2005, 12:11:42 AM »

Until I saw that video I would have said no, but after listening to the Middle aged Russians talk about it I would have to say that it might have been a factor.

By the way , are you calling Reagan a fascist? My definition of facist would be a dictator who rules by brutal force. Maybe you don't agree with his politics but I see no evidence of fascism, by my definition.

His economic policies were fascist, in that they were for further corporate control and a weakening of state control. I wish conservatives would stop associating the word fascist with the Nazis, there are other examples of that system. Reagan's presidency, while officially a democracy, resulted in a massive shift towards the right on the political spectrum on all issues he confronted, and that means a move towards fascist economics.

So your basic argument is that a fascist is a person on the right wing with whom you disagree.  How convenient.   Although I wish most people who bandied the term about would admit that they are taking the word outside of its proper historical framework.
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 16, 2005, 10:05:20 AM »

Until I saw that video I would have said no, but after listening to the Middle aged Russians talk about it I would have to say that it might have been a factor.

By the way , are you calling Reagan a fascist? My definition of facist would be a dictator who rules by brutal force. Maybe you don't agree with his politics but I see no evidence of fascism, by my definition.

His economic policies were fascist, in that they were for further corporate control and a weakening of state control. I wish conservatives would stop associating the word fascist with the Nazis, there are other examples of that system. Reagan's presidency, while officially a democracy, resulted in a massive shift towards the right on the political spectrum on all issues he confronted, and that means a move towards fascist economics.
Sounds to me like you equate fascism to anti-socialism.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 16, 2005, 10:07:51 AM »

fascist

1.
a.  A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
b.  A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.

2.
Oppressive, dictatorial control.
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 16, 2005, 10:10:32 AM »

You mean McCartney was in a group before Wings?

LOL  Judging by the age listed in your profile, I'm guessing that you're joking. But I was thinking of giving another choice; "Who is Paul McCartney?" for the benefit of the really young whippersnappers on the forum.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.232 seconds with 12 queries.