Opinion of "right to work" laws
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 01:09:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of "right to work" laws
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Freedom laws
 
#2
Horrible laws
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 63

Author Topic: Opinion of "right to work" laws  (Read 3062 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 12, 2012, 09:36:27 PM »


Why not? (Not trying to be bellicose, I'm genuinely curious.)

I think they've largely outlived their usefulness (and they haven't done anything for me personally).

Also, I don't like how they went after Blanche Lincoln in 2010.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,895
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 12, 2012, 09:38:33 PM »

Also, I don't like how they went after Blanche Lincoln in 2010.

That's an utterly pathetic reason to hold a position on anything.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 12, 2012, 09:40:03 PM »

Freedom laws.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 12, 2012, 10:02:11 PM »

Also, I don't like how they went after Blanche Lincoln in 2010.

That's an utterly pathetic reason to hold a position on anything.

She's in my family....Its kinda personal.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,528


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 12, 2012, 10:04:31 PM »

Also, I don't like how they went after Blanche Lincoln in 2010.

That's an utterly pathetic reason to hold a position on anything.

She's in my family....Its kinda personal.

That's why I dislike the current Democratic State Auditor of Massachsuetts. The Republican candidate who she beat, somewhat unfairly, is my cousin.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 12, 2012, 11:07:12 PM »

Also, I don't like how they went after Blanche Lincoln in 2010.

That's an utterly pathetic reason to hold a position on anything.

She's in my family....Its kinda personal.

That's why I dislike the current Democratic State Auditor of Massachsuetts. The Republican candidate who she beat, somewhat unfairly, is my cousin.

Somewhat unfairly?  She's not even a CPA!  (In addition to being a tax cheat* and employing a convicted Satanic ritual murderer on her campaign staff).  Goes to show you how overrun this shivhole of a state is with idiotic zombies.

*Which I only mind in hypocrites.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,528


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 12, 2012, 11:39:38 PM »

I say 'somewhat unfairly' because I thought that Mary's tales of what a bad candidate Bump was might be overblown, since she's not an objective source (for that matter, neither are you, but you're a little more objective than Mary is). I was out of the commonwealth for most of the campaign.

Most Massachusetts politicians are awful but the same is true of pretty much everywhere else, you must admit.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 13, 2012, 12:03:36 AM »

I say 'somewhat unfairly' because I thought that Mary's tales of what a bad candidate Bump was might be overblown, since she's not an objective source (for that matter, neither are you, but you're a little more objective than Mary is). I was out of the commonwealth for most of the campaign.

Most Massachusetts politicians are awful but the same is true of pretty much everywhere else, you must admit.

Oh, of course, in fact even most Massachusetts Republicans are either despicable neocons, or insufferably-smug WASPy Rockefeller types, with a minority of ultra-Catholic moralfags (Connaughton was of the last variety, IIRC).  However, there's rarely been a more objectively large gulf between two candidates, and for a non-ideological position, as Connaughton-Bump.  Luckily for us, the state auditor doesn't really do anything, so Ms. Bump can be as incompetent and unqualfied for her position as she likes.

Except for Governor all other elections for statewide offices should probably be non-partisan.  Certainly Auditor should.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,528


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: February 13, 2012, 12:10:43 AM »

I say 'somewhat unfairly' because I thought that Mary's tales of what a bad candidate Bump was might be overblown, since she's not an objective source (for that matter, neither are you, but you're a little more objective than Mary is). I was out of the commonwealth for most of the campaign.

Most Massachusetts politicians are awful but the same is true of pretty much everywhere else, you must admit.

Oh, of course, in fact even most Massachusetts Republicans are either despicable neocons, or insufferably-smug WASPy Rockefeller types, with a minority of ultra-Catholic moralfags (Connaughton was of the last variety, IIRC).  However, there's rarely been a more objectively large gulf between two candidates, and for a non-ideological position, as Connaughton-Bump.  Luckily for us, the state auditor doesn't really do anything, so Ms. Bump can be as incompetent and unqualfied for her position as she likes.

Mary's actually a combination of the second and third varieties you mention here. She's considerably less moralfaggy in that sense than the fact that she's an Italian Catholic might suggest. Although she's still somewhat moralfaggy relative to a lot of the other people in our family.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I completely agree, of course.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: February 13, 2012, 12:14:30 AM »

I recall hearing her name in relation to one of the gay marriage-banning ballot initiatives; am I correct in that?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,528


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: February 13, 2012, 12:22:33 AM »

I don't recall. It's entirely possible, but as of now she really doesn't seem to particularly care about it. It's certainly possible that she freaked out about it when it originally happened. She's the sort of person who might before calming down about the whole thing.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,764
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 13, 2012, 04:29:41 PM »

They are Freedom Laws unequivocally. I don't oppose the idea of unions. It's that unions oppose letting  nonunion labor into the same shop and forced political contributions that I oppose.
Logged
lowtech redneck
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 273
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: February 16, 2012, 04:19:09 PM »

Freedom laws.
Logged
Rooney
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 843
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 16, 2012, 04:22:08 PM »

If one does not have to work then why should they want that "right"? Some people just can not be happy!
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,010
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 16, 2012, 05:35:08 PM »

How does the government have the right to regulate employment contracts?

HLs
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 18, 2012, 09:45:09 AM »

How does the government have the right to regulate employment contracts?

HLs

how does the government have the right to regulate property ownership?
Logged
Rooney
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 843
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: February 18, 2012, 10:39:37 PM »

How does the government have the right to regulate employment contracts?

HLs

Under the Lochner decision it did not, but that time has long since passed, and how sad it is.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.233 seconds with 12 queries.