Who or what Hillary has blamed for her loss. So far.

[Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Clinton campaign ignored Bill’s advice and felt white working class voters weren’t worth the time.

Herein lies the real reason Hillary lost.  

She ignored white working class voters, took them for granted in key states, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin.

Trump acknowledged their plight and said he would take action.

Hillary's own vanity and pride was her downfall.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/11/13/losers-clinton-campaign-ignored-bills-advice-and-felt-white-working-class-voters-werent-worth-the-time-n2245095

The vain, prideful people are the pampered, fickle voters in the Rust Belt who got their fee-fees hurt by Hillary not campaigning in their town (as she, along with Trump, did not for well over 90% of Americans) and spitefully decided not to vote for her. Nobody needs a personal visit to find out about candidates in 2016, and those of us who don't have #SwingStatePrivilege somehow manage to make a non-petty choice every 4 years anyway.

Darn those voters for choosing a man who actually spoke to them and their concerns and didn't take them for granted. To argue that the average rust belt voter, the people hammered after years of big-government policies, should have sucked it up, and gone along with the anointment of Queen Hillary, is frankly ludicrous. It wasn't just that she didn't campaign in their towns; it was that she ignored them and the issues important to them.

The voters didn't chose Trump by a margin of almost 3 million. Just a reminder.

That post was only referring to the rustbelt, not the country as a whole, and we don't use the NPV to decide things.

[Badger]

Clinton campaign ignored Bill’s advice and felt white working class voters weren’t worth the time.

Herein lies the real reason Hillary lost.  

She ignored white working class voters, took them for granted in key states, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin.

Trump acknowledged their plight and said he would take action.

Hillary's own vanity and pride was her downfall.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/11/13/losers-clinton-campaign-ignored-bills-advice-and-felt-white-working-class-voters-werent-worth-the-time-n2245095

The vain, prideful people are the pampered, fickle voters in the Rust Belt who got their fee-fees hurt by Hillary not campaigning in their town (as she, along with Trump, did not for well over 90% of Americans) and spitefully decided not to vote for her. Nobody needs a personal visit to find out about candidates in 2016, and those of us who don't have #SwingStatePrivilege somehow manage to make a non-petty choice every 4 years anyway.

Darn those voters for choosing a man who actually spoke to them and their concerns and didn't take them for granted. To argue that the average rust belt voter, the people hammered after years of big-government policies, should have sucked it up, and gone along with the anointment of Queen Hillary, is frankly ludicrous. It wasn't just that she didn't campaign in their towns; it was that she ignored them and the issues important to them.

The voters didn't chose Trump by a margin of almost 3 million. Just a reminder.

That post was only referring to the rustbelt, not the country as a whole, and we don't use the NPV to decide things.

Really Wulfric? Well that sure explains a lot. Thanks!

[7,052,770]

Clinton campaign ignored Bill’s advice and felt white working class voters weren’t worth the time.

Herein lies the real reason Hillary lost.  

She ignored white working class voters, took them for granted in key states, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin.

Trump acknowledged their plight and said he would take action.

Hillary's own vanity and pride was her downfall.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/11/13/losers-clinton-campaign-ignored-bills-advice-and-felt-white-working-class-voters-werent-worth-the-time-n2245095

The vain, prideful people are the pampered, fickle voters in the Rust Belt who got their fee-fees hurt by Hillary not campaigning in their town (as she, along with Trump, did not for well over 90% of Americans) and spitefully decided not to vote for her. Nobody needs a personal visit to find out about candidates in 2016, and those of us who don't have #SwingStatePrivilege somehow manage to make a non-petty choice every 4 years anyway.

Darn those voters for choosing a man who actually spoke to them and their concerns and didn't take them for granted. To argue that the average rust belt voter, the people hammered after years of big-government policies, should have sucked it up, and gone along with the anointment of Queen Hillary, is frankly ludicrous. It wasn't just that she didn't campaign in their towns; it was that she ignored them and the issues important to them.

The voters didn't chose Trump by a margin of almost 3 million. Just a reminder.

That post was only referring to the rustbelt, not the country as a whole, and we don't use the NPV to decide things.

We do use the NPV to determine "the will of the people," "Americans chose..." "the voice of the voters," and other sayings.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Clinton campaign ignored Bill’s advice and felt white working class voters weren’t worth the time.

Herein lies the real reason Hillary lost.  

She ignored white working class voters, took them for granted in key states, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin.

Trump acknowledged their plight and said he would take action.

Hillary's own vanity and pride was her downfall.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/11/13/losers-clinton-campaign-ignored-bills-advice-and-felt-white-working-class-voters-werent-worth-the-time-n2245095

The vain, prideful people are the pampered, fickle voters in the Rust Belt who got their fee-fees hurt by Hillary not campaigning in their town (as she, along with Trump, did not for well over 90% of Americans) and spitefully decided not to vote for her. Nobody needs a personal visit to find out about candidates in 2016, and those of us who don't have #SwingStatePrivilege somehow manage to make a non-petty choice every 4 years anyway.

Darn those voters for choosing a man who actually spoke to them and their concerns and didn't take them for granted. To argue that the average rust belt voter, the people hammered after years of big-government policies, should have sucked it up, and gone along with the anointment of Queen Hillary, is frankly ludicrous. It wasn't just that she didn't campaign in their towns; it was that she ignored them and the issues important to them.

The voters didn't chose Trump by a margin of almost 3 million. Just a reminder.

That post was only referring to the rustbelt, not the country as a whole, and we don't use the NPV to decide things.

We do use the NPV to determine "the will of the people," "Americans chose..." "the voice of the voters," and other sayings.

Hillary spent money in California and Texas but not Michigan and Wisconsin, which is an excellent way to win the popular vote while losing the electoral vote.

http://adage.com/article/campaign-trail/states-where-trump-clinton-spending-most-on-advertising/306377/