Who would you rather be president: Pinochet, or Marjorie Taylor Greene?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 08:28:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Who would you rather be president: Pinochet, or Marjorie Taylor Greene?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Pinochet
 
#2
MTG
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 57

Author Topic: Who would you rather be president: Pinochet, or Marjorie Taylor Greene?  (Read 1285 times)
kaoras
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,264
Chile


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: December 26, 2021, 03:11:45 PM »

MTG would be too distracted by whatever nonsensical right wing outrage moment of the week like Mr Potato Head or Cat in the Hat to be able to set up death camps for her critics.
3,000 people killed over 17 years does not indicate “death camps” in any meaningful terms.

Here’s a question that’s slightly unrelated: how many people do you think Trump, Biden, Bush, Clinton, etc. killed?

So what do you call Pisagua then? Villa Grimaldi?

You are really getting on my nerves with all this Pinochet downplaying.
Logged
TheReckoning
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,807
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: December 26, 2021, 03:19:00 PM »

MTG would be too distracted by whatever nonsensical right wing outrage moment of the week like Mr Potato Head or Cat in the Hat to be able to set up death camps for her critics.
3,000 people killed over 17 years does not indicate “death camps” in any meaningful terms.

Here’s a question that’s slightly unrelated: how many people do you think Trump, Biden, Bush, Clinton, etc. killed?

So what do you call Pisagua then? Villa Grimaldi?

You are really getting on my nerves with all this Pinochet downplaying.

The fact that less than 10% of people who were detained at those camps were killed shows that they weren’t “death camps.” They were prisons with large amounts of executions.
Logged
kaoras
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,264
Chile


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: December 26, 2021, 03:25:34 PM »

MTG would be too distracted by whatever nonsensical right wing outrage moment of the week like Mr Potato Head or Cat in the Hat to be able to set up death camps for her critics.
3,000 people killed over 17 years does not indicate “death camps” in any meaningful terms.

Here’s a question that’s slightly unrelated: how many people do you think Trump, Biden, Bush, Clinton, etc. killed?

So what do you call Pisagua then? Villa Grimaldi?

You are really getting on my nerves with all this Pinochet downplaying.

The fact that less than 10% of people who were detained at those camps were killed shows that they weren’t “death camps.” They were prisons with large amounts of executions.

So according to you a place where thousand of people are tortured and hundred are killed isn't a death camp? This is the absolute state of gringo conservatism
Logged
TheReckoning
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,807
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: December 26, 2021, 03:28:36 PM »

MTG would be too distracted by whatever nonsensical right wing outrage moment of the week like Mr Potato Head or Cat in the Hat to be able to set up death camps for her critics.
3,000 people killed over 17 years does not indicate “death camps” in any meaningful terms.

Here’s a question that’s slightly unrelated: how many people do you think Trump, Biden, Bush, Clinton, etc. killed?

So what do you call Pisagua then? Villa Grimaldi?

You are really getting on my nerves with all this Pinochet downplaying.

The fact that less than 10% of people who were detained at those camps were killed shows that they weren’t “death camps.” They were prisons with large amounts of executions.

So according to you a place where thousand of people are tortured and hundred are killed isn't a death camp? This is the absolute state of gringo conservatism
The whole point of a death camp is to kill people. If a vast majority of people aren’t killed (not through failure, but by purpose) than that means that it can’t be considered a death camp.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.224 seconds with 12 queries.