More Terrorism in Moscow
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 05:29:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  More Terrorism in Moscow
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: More Terrorism in Moscow  (Read 4175 times)
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 31, 2004, 08:34:07 PM »

10 people killed; 50 wounded in the attack.

Russia has to do something drastic to the Chechnyan mainland, or it's going to get worse.
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2004, 05:22:52 AM »

Like what?
I'd let them have their independence. Build a massive wall between Chechnya and Russia.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2004, 05:50:01 AM »

10 people killed; 50 wounded in the attack.

Russia has to do something drastic to the Chechnyan mainland, or it's going to get worse.
ie, pull the f* out.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2004, 09:42:02 AM »

I say start a 75-day bombing of Chechen-supportive area. If women and children die in the process, so be it, for peace in the future.
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2004, 09:47:12 AM »

...and you claim you aren't a troll?

This would just create 10 thousand new terrorists Brambila.
There is no sensible reason for Russia clinging onto Chechnya. They'd be better off without it.
It kind of reminds me of the situation in Northern Ireland. Get rid!!
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2004, 12:19:12 PM »

I say start a 75-day bombing of Chechen-supportive area. If women and children die in the process, so be it, for peace in the future.
They've started a 200-year version of that 200 years ago...look where it got them.
Logged
Beaver
Rookie
**
Posts: 107


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2004, 02:24:38 PM »

...and you claim you aren't a troll?

I am getting so tired of people calling others trolls like that.....just because you don't agree DOESN'T MEAN HE'S A TROLL!!

Agreed
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 01, 2004, 05:38:35 PM »

...and you claim you aren't a troll?

This would just create 10 thousand new terrorists Brambila.
There is no sensible reason for Russia clinging onto Chechnya. They'd be better off without it.
It kind of reminds me of the situation in Northern Ireland. Get rid!!

Ireland deserves independence 100% of Ireland...all of it. The English were very brutal towards the Irish including raping Irish women and starving families to death.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 01, 2004, 06:38:17 PM »

Yes, Ireland deserves complete independence from itself. Smiley
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 01, 2004, 06:39:05 PM »

Yes, Ireland deserves complete independence from itself. Smiley

I meant that N.I. needs the occupying forces removed either willingly or by the UN.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 01, 2004, 10:02:00 PM »

...and you claim you aren't a troll?

This would just create 10 thousand new terrorists Brambila.
There is no sensible reason for Russia clinging onto Chechnya. They'd be better off without it.
It kind of reminds me of the situation in Northern Ireland. Get rid!!

Please explain how that is trollish. It's a very honest opinion. In addition, I say that Muslims have attempted to do that, but have failed because they don't have the resources. We have the resources, so why not take advantage of what we have. If you frighten people enough, they will fear you and stop.

What's your solution? Give Chechnya independance? Yes. And watch them launch a Jihad on Russia for all the Muslims living in Circassia/North Caucasus. Then they'll march into the heart of Europe as they did in the 1500s in Vienna.
Logged
freedomburns
FreedomBurns
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,237


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 01, 2004, 10:53:55 PM »

I say start a 75-day bombing of Chechen-supportive area. If women and children die in the process, so be it, for peace in the future.

You are a kook, a troll, a dangerous warmonger and a person of questionable moral character.  Advocating the killing of innocent muslim women and children is exactly why I would condone our government taking actions and giving money to aid a "terrorist" organization in attempting to blow up haters and murderers like you.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 01, 2004, 11:08:07 PM »

I say start a 75-day bombing of Chechen-supportive area. If women and children die in the process, so be it, for peace in the future.

You are a kook, a troll, a dangerous warmonger and a person of questionable moral character.  Advocating the killing of innocent muslim women and children is exactly why I would condone our government taking actions and giving money to aid a "terrorist" organization in attempting to blow up haters and murderers like you.

I'm not saying we should direct the bombings to children. But if they die, it's for the security of Russian children, and ultimately, Chechnyan children. Many more are being killed. Too many.
Logged
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 02, 2004, 03:32:52 AM »
« Edited: September 02, 2004, 03:59:13 AM by Michael Z »

I say start a 75-day bombing of Chechen-supportive area. If women and children die in the process, so be it, for peace in the future.

You are a kook, a troll, a dangerous warmonger and a person of questionable moral character.  Advocating the killing of innocent muslim women and children is exactly why I would condone our government taking actions and giving money to aid a "terrorist" organization in attempting to blow up haters and murderers like you.

I'm not saying we should direct the bombings to children. But if they die, it's for the security of Russian children, and ultimately, Chechnyan children. Many more are being killed. Too many.

Ironically it's precisely that kind of tactic (large-scale bombing of Chechnya) which has been applied for the last decade and has now resulted in the mess we see before us. Retribution begets retribution, and simply by enforcing a policy of death and destruction upon the "other" you are not forcing them into submission. On the contrary.

I'm certainly not excusing what is happening in Russia right now, but the reason Russian children are being threatened is due to the fact that Chechen children have already died, bringing forth calls of retribution. The old adage of how an action creates a reaction and ultimately that reaction causes another reaction (and so forth) springs to mind.

In short, what you're suggesting would only cause more bloodshed on both sides.
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 02, 2004, 04:02:50 AM »

Yes, Ireland deserves complete independence from itself. Smiley

I meant that N.I. needs the occupying forces removed either willingly or by the UN.

I find it hilarious when Americans talk about Northern Ireland. 90% of them haven't got a clue!
Let me explain.
The British forces were sent into Northern Ireland to keep the peace, they are not occupying forces, their original role was as peacekeepers. Their job was to try and keep the peace between the majority protestants and minority catholics!
Personally I am in favour of a united Ireland, however it's never going to happen because the majority of Northern Irish want to remain part of the UK.
Get it?
About 60% of the population of Northern Ireland (the protestants) wish to remain part of the UK! If you want proof look at the recent elections which saw the hardline catholic hating DUP elected as the largest party.
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,223


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 02, 2004, 04:31:16 AM »

...and you claim you aren't a troll?

This would just create 10 thousand new terrorists Brambila.
There is no sensible reason for Russia clinging onto Chechnya. They'd be better off without it.
It kind of reminds me of the situation in Northern Ireland. Get rid!!

Ireland deserves independence 100% of Ireland...all of it. The English were very brutal towards the Irish including raping Irish women and starving families to death.

You're only saying that because you are Irish. If you were not you would say Britain should nuke Dublin or something.
Logged
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 02, 2004, 04:55:56 AM »
« Edited: September 02, 2004, 05:05:12 AM by Michael Z »

Northern Ireland exists due to this; back in 1921, when the UK decided to grant Ireland independence, Northern Ireland decided to stay on as part of the United Kingdom due to the fact that half of the people in NI regard themselves as Irish, the other half as British. And that's really where the crux of the problem lies, since the region has been in a state of civil war since.

Anyway, I'm with English on this one. I'm a bit fed up with Americans berating us about "giving Ireland back to the Irish" when they don't seem to know much about the issues. Trust me, most Brits are sick and tired of this whole thing and would GLADLY get the hell out of NI. Unfortunately they can't, because if they did the two communities there would tear each other apart.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 02, 2004, 12:45:21 PM »
« Edited: September 02, 2004, 12:45:43 PM by Brambila »

I say start a 75-day bombing of Chechen-supportive area. If women and children die in the process, so be it, for peace in the future.

You are a kook, a troll, a dangerous warmonger and a person of questionable moral character.  Advocating the killing of innocent muslim women and children is exactly why I would condone our government taking actions and giving money to aid a "terrorist" organization in attempting to blow up haters and murderers like you.

I'm not saying we should direct the bombings to children. But if they die, it's for the security of Russian children, and ultimately, Chechnyan children. Many more are being killed. Too many.

Ironically it's precisely that kind of tactic (large-scale bombing of Chechnya) which has been applied for the last decade and has now resulted in the mess we see before us. Retribution begets retribution, and simply by enforcing a policy of death and destruction upon the "other" you are not forcing them into submission. On the contrary.

I'm certainly not excusing what is happening in Russia right now, but the reason Russian children are being threatened is due to the fact that Chechen children have already died, bringing forth calls of retribution. The old adage of how an action creates a reaction and ultimately that reaction causes another reaction (and so forth) springs to mind.

In short, what you're suggesting would only cause more bloodshed on both sides.

No, you're absolutely wrong. Yeltsin's plans were working, but two problems arose. First of all, Al-Qaeda took control of Chechnya, and heavily influenced the Chechnyan people. Before, they were more secular. Second of all, Yeltsin stopped the invasion of Chechnya. He should have continued the invasion. It has absolutely nothing to invading Chechnya, because that's not what has been going on. Putin is very weak for pushing aside the war that has been placed on his lap.

If children are killed in the bombing, I call out for Putin to seriously damage Chechnya. Give the Chechnyans a 48 hour warning.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 02, 2004, 03:18:00 PM »

Yes, Ireland deserves complete independence from itself. Smiley

I meant that N.I. needs the occupying forces removed either willingly or by the UN.

I find it hilarious when Americans talk about Northern Ireland. 90% of them haven't got a clue!
Let me explain.
The British forces were sent into Northern Ireland to keep the peace, they are not occupying forces, their original role was as peacekeepers. Their job was to try and keep the peace between the majority protestants and minority catholics!
Personally I am in favour of a united Ireland, however it's never going to happen because the majority of Northern Irish want to remain part of the UK.
Get it?
About 60% of the population of Northern Ireland (the protestants) wish to remain part of the UK! If you want proof look at the recent elections which saw the hardline catholic hating DUP elected as the largest party.

The only reason N.I. is so protestant is because families were starved and women were raped and the original Catholics were forced to convert or starve to death. BTW, I am NOT Irish, but my wife is and knows loads about Irish history as do I. Most British would dismiss the the Irish potatoe famine as just a tragic event, when in fact the British used it to brutalized the Irish. The British also treated Scotland like dogs as well.
Logged
ThePrezMex
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 730
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: 5.25, S: -1.69

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 03, 2004, 12:40:31 AM »
« Edited: September 03, 2004, 12:42:14 AM by ThePrezMex »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I agree on this with Brambila.
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 03, 2004, 04:58:13 AM »


The only reason N.I. is so protestant is because families were starved and women were raped and the original Catholics were forced to convert or starve to death. BTW, I am NOT Irish, but my wife is and knows loads about Irish history as do I. Most British would dismiss the the Irish potatoe famine as just a tragic event, when in fact the British used it to brutalized the Irish. The British also treated Scotland like dogs as well.

You've been watching too many hollywood movies Statesrights!
Firstly the Scots ARE British!! Great Britain is the island, of which England, Wales and Scotland are constituent nations. We're all British!
Secondly,  the protestant nature of NI is due to Scottish settlers who sailed across to Ulster in the 17th century. It has nothing to do with the native Irish being starved or forced to convert. I agree Britain has a shameful history in Ireland, I've never denied it. In fact I would like Northern Ireland to join with Eire. If you knew anything about the NI situation you would know that most English actually favour a united Ireland!! We don't want the damn place, it's the protestants in NI that want us!! If we pulled out of Northern Ireland the place would decend into civil war. Can you not understand this?
As for Scotland, you're wrong again. The aristocracy brutalised the Scots, just as they did the poor people of England, or anyone else who disagreed with them. It was no fun for the average English peasant either you know!!
It constantly annoys me the way the English are demonised in hollywood movies, it's simply nonsense. England has never been one united country anyway, it's far more complicated. Places like Cornwall for example has more in common with Wales and Scotland than England.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 03, 2004, 03:50:26 PM »


The only reason N.I. is so protestant is because families were starved and women were raped and the original Catholics were forced to convert or starve to death. BTW, I am NOT Irish, but my wife is and knows loads about Irish history as do I. Most British would dismiss the the Irish potatoe famine as just a tragic event, when in fact the British used it to brutalized the Irish. The British also treated Scotland like dogs as well.

You've been watching too many hollywood movies Statesrights!
Firstly the Scots ARE British!! Great Britain is the island, of which England, Wales and Scotland are constituent nations. We're all British!
Secondly,  the protestant nature of NI is due to Scottish settlers who sailed across to Ulster in the 17th century. It has nothing to do with the native Irish being starved or forced to convert. I agree Britain has a shameful history in Ireland, I've never denied it. In fact I would like Northern Ireland to join with Eire. If you knew anything about the NI situation you would know that most English actually favour a united Ireland!! We don't want the damn place, it's the protestants in NI that want us!! If we pulled out of Northern Ireland the place would decend into civil war. Can you not understand this?
As for Scotland, you're wrong again. The aristocracy brutalised the Scots, just as they did the poor people of England, or anyone else who disagreed with them. It was no fun for the average English peasant either you know!!
It constantly annoys me the way the English are demonised in hollywood movies, it's simply nonsense. England has never been one united country anyway, it's far more complicated. Places like Cornwall for example has more in common with Wales and Scotland than England.

What I wrote is the version of history we get over here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.246 seconds with 10 queries.