New polls in WI, MN and IA
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 01:09:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  New polls in WI, MN and IA
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: New polls in WI, MN and IA  (Read 2491 times)
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 15, 2004, 09:22:32 PM »
« edited: July 15, 2004, 09:29:08 PM by Tredrick »

These polls were taken over a long time, but they are nice enough to mention the Edwards effect.

One nice thing is they have a 2 way race and a 4 way, with Nadar and Badnarik, for each one.

Minnesota

Two Person
Kerry     49.0%
Bush     45.8%

Four person
Kerry     46.5%
Bush     44.2%
Nader     4.6%
Badnarik 1.0%

Kerry saw slight gains after the Edwards announcement.


Wisconsin

Kerry     45.9%
Bush     48.4%

Kerry     44.6%
Bush     46.1%
Nader     4.0%
Badnarik 1.5%


Iowa

Kerry     50.5%
Bush     45.7%

Kerry     47.7%
Bush     44.4%
Nader     2.7%
Badnarik 1.1%

This is where Kerry got the biggest bounce from Edwards, changing the poll from a dead heat to the numbers above.

http://www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/csp/elections/HumphreySurvey1.pdf
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2004, 09:25:49 PM »

Remember what Vorlon says about uni polls...and it seems to hold up here.  Kerry's lead widens in 2 of the 3 polls when Nader is included.
Logged
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2004, 09:33:58 PM »


MN
2-way:  Kerry leads by 3.2%
4-way:  Kerry leads by 2.3%

WI
2-way:  Bush leads by 2.5%
4-way:  Bush leads by 1.5%

IA
2-way:  Kerry leads by 4.7%
4-way:  Kerry leads by 3.3%

Only in WI is Kerry aided in the 4-way.

Also, they are RV polls.  Defintely not the greatest, the time frame is way too long for one thing.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2004, 09:45:02 PM »

Whoops.  added wrong.
Logged
millwx
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 402


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2004, 09:56:58 PM »

FWIW, the one month poll average is the various states with recent polls or just assumed "close" states...

Arizona = Bush +6.1%
Arkansas = Bush +0.2%
Florida = Bush +0.6%
Georgia = Bush +13.0%
Iowa = Kerry +2.8%
Michigan = Kerry +5.3%
Minnesota = Kerry +7.2%
Missouri = Bush +1.0%
New Mexico = Kerry +7.0%
North Carolina = Bush +7.8%
Ohio = Bush +1.4%
Oregon = Kerry +8.3%
Pennsylvania = Kerry +3.4%
South Carolina = Bush +13.0%
Virginia = Bush +5.3%
Washington = Kerry +6.6%
West Virginia = Bush +3.7%
Wisconsin = Kerry +2.2%

Note that most of these states, though close (with a few exceptions), aren't as close as some would make them sound.  In most of these states the leader has a 5% lead or more.  Given that this is a poll average, even a 3% lead is probably a true "lean".  So, only states with the leader up less than 3% are true battlegrounds or tossups... this includes only AR, FL, IA, MO, OH and WI.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2004, 10:42:03 PM »

Why is Kerry losing by a fairly large total in Wisconsin? It has 2 Democratic senators and always seemed Democratic to me.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
bandit73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2004, 10:52:05 PM »

Any poll that shows Bush winning Wisconsin should be tossed in the trash.
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2004, 11:01:32 PM »
« Edited: July 15, 2004, 11:01:54 PM by John Ford »

Any poll that shows Bush winning Wisconsin should be tossed in the trash.

And Kentucky polls with Bush ahead, too!
Logged
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2004, 11:04:06 PM »

Since Wisconsin was basically a tie in 2000, why would you burn any poll showing the state close in 04?
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
bandit73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2004, 11:07:15 PM »

Since Wisconsin was basically a tie in 2000, why would you burn any poll showing the state close in 04?

Because people in Wisconsin know better than to elect some idiot like Bush.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2004, 11:12:43 PM »

Since Wisconsin was basically a tie in 2000, why would you burn any poll showing the state close in 04?

Because people in Wisconsin know better than to elect some idiot like Bush.

I wish people in New Hampshire did too.
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 15, 2004, 11:13:47 PM »
« Edited: July 15, 2004, 11:24:10 PM by Southwest AFRNC Chairman Josh22 »

Since Wisconsin was basically a tie in 2000, why would you burn any poll showing the state close in 04?

Because people in Wisconsin know better than to elect some idiot like Bush.

Will you just shut up!!! Take your wacky left talk somewhere else!
Logged
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 15, 2004, 11:14:57 PM »

Great in depth answer as usual.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,001
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 15, 2004, 11:31:43 PM »
« Edited: July 15, 2004, 11:47:32 PM by Better Red Than Dead »

The problem with Wisconsin is Waukesha county, that place is easily to the right of any county in Minnesota except maybe Carver and Roseau, but unlike those two it's actually rather heavily populated. It's the 3rd most populated county in the state, and might even be able to cancel out the Democrat's margins in Milwaukee depending on turnout. Waukesha in 2002 was also easily Bush's 2nd best county of major size outside of the Deep South and Utah, only Ottawa, Michigan beat it.

Wisconsin's been polling weird, but most of the polls with Bush ahead are crappy uni ones, the 1st tier ones show Kerry ahead. I'm betting on Kerry winning.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 16, 2004, 08:34:37 AM »

Since Wisconsin was basically a tie in 2000, why would you burn any poll showing the state close in 04?

Because people in Wisconsin know better than to elect some idiot like Bush.

Will you just shut up!!! Take your wacky left talk somewhere else!

Take your wacky right talk somewhere else.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 16, 2004, 08:40:43 AM »

Since Wisconsin was basically a tie in 2000, why would you burn any poll showing the state close in 04?

Because people in Wisconsin know better than to elect some idiot like Bush.

Will you just shut up!!! Take your wacky left talk somewhere else!

Take your wacky right talk somewhere else.

There's a difference between being delirious and being wacky. Tongue

But it is a little worrisome that Bush is doing so well in Wisconsin. I'd have expected it to be more tied than lean Bush.
Logged
stry_cat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 367


Political Matrix
E: 6.25, S: -1.38

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 16, 2004, 09:01:06 AM »

I'm thinking WI is going to be the NH of 2004.  A lone Bush state borded by all Kerry states.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 16, 2004, 09:15:51 AM »

I'm thinking WI is going to be the NH of 2004.  A lone Bush state borded by all Kerry states.
It's distinctly possible.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 16, 2004, 09:16:42 AM »

FWIW, the one month poll average is the various states with recent polls or just assumed "close" states...

Arizona = Bush +6.1%
Arkansas = Bush +0.2%
Florida = Bush +0.6%
Georgia = Bush +13.0%
Iowa = Kerry +2.8%
Michigan = Kerry +5.3%
Minnesota = Kerry +7.2%
Missouri = Bush +1.0%
New Mexico = Kerry +7.0%
North Carolina = Bush +7.8%
Ohio = Bush +1.4%
Oregon = Kerry +8.3%
Pennsylvania = Kerry +3.4%
South Carolina = Bush +13.0%
Virginia = Bush +5.3%
Washington = Kerry +6.6%
West Virginia = Bush +3.7%
Wisconsin = Kerry +2.2%

Note that most of these states, though close (with a few exceptions), aren't as close as some would make them sound.  In most of these states the leader has a 5% lead or more.  Given that this is a poll average, even a 3% lead is probably a true "lean".  So, only states with the leader up less than 3% are true battlegrounds or tossups... this includes only AR, FL, IA, MO, OH and WI.
What are Georgia, SC, even NC doing on that list?
Where's New Hampshire? Nevada? Maine?
Logged
classical liberal
RightWingNut
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,758


Political Matrix
E: 9.35, S: -8.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 16, 2004, 09:17:22 AM »

The problem with Wisconsin is Waukesha county, that place is easily to the right of any county in Minnesota except maybe Carver and Roseau, but unlike those two it's actually rather heavily populated. It's the 3rd most populated county in the state, and might even be able to cancel out the Democrat's margins in Milwaukee depending on turnout. Waukesha in 2002 was also easily Bush's 2nd best county of major size outside of the Deep South and Utah, only Ottawa, Michigan beat it.

Wisconsin's been polling weird, but most of the polls with Bush ahead are crappy uni ones, the 1st tier ones show Kerry ahead. I'm betting on Kerry winning.

I doubt that Waukesha could counter Milwaukee as Bush's vote margin in Waukesha was 40,000 votes smaller than Gore's in Milwaukee.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 16, 2004, 09:20:03 AM »


We'll know in 15.5 weeks!  hahaha . . . God, can't wait till all of this is over.  I can get back to watching HGTV and TLC on a nightly basis, rather than FOX News and CNN.  *laughs*
Logged
Mort from NewYawk
MortfromNewYawk
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 399


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 16, 2004, 09:41:30 AM »

I'm thinking WI is going to be the NH of 2004.  A lone Bush state borded by all Kerry states.

I'm thinking and hoping that MN and IL will fill that bill - two lone Kerry states in a vast blue Bush Midwest.
Logged
English
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,187


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 16, 2004, 09:56:34 AM »

I'm thinking WI is going to be the NH of 2004.  A lone Bush state borded by all Kerry states.

Funny you should say that! Here is my earlier prediction! I have a feeling about WI, it will go GOP while MO goes the other way.

Logged
Mort from NewYawk
MortfromNewYawk
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 399


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 16, 2004, 10:20:54 AM »

I'm thinking WI is going to be the NH of 2004.  A lone Bush state borded by all Kerry states.

Funny you should say that! Here is my earlier prediction! I have a feeling about WI, it will go GOP while MO goes the other way.



Except maybe NV and AZ, I agree completely with your battleground states (light blue and light red).

The Dems should put Edwards on a boat and sail him up and down the Ohio and upper Mississippi Rivers for the next three and a half months.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 16, 2004, 10:22:49 AM »

Edwards should be in the steel states with surroundings: Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia. Also some of the Upper mIdwest, such as Wisconsin. He might also do a few tours to North Carolina, maybe even Arkansas.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 12 queries.