Large counties vs. small counties
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 01:21:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Large counties vs. small counties
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Large counties vs. small counties  (Read 12604 times)
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 12, 2009, 05:16:28 AM »

This is a comparison of the candidates' performances in states in small counties and large counties.  Any county where over 100,000 votes was cast is considered large.

Northeast

Maine (Large)
Obama - 62.21%
McCain - 36.07%
Other - 1.73%

Maine (Small)
Obama - 55.42%
McCain - 43.28%
Other - 1.30%

New Hampshire (Large)
Obama - 50.61%
McCain - 48.08%
Other - 1.31%

New Hampshire (Small)
Obama - 58.00%
McCain - 40.61%
Other - 1.39%

Vermont (All Small)
Obama - 67.46%
McCain - 30.45%
Other - 2.09%

Massachusetts (Large)
Obama - 61.03%
McCain - 36.79%
Other - 2.19%

Massachusetts (Small)
Obama - 72.86%
McCain - 24.57%
Other - 2.57%

Connecticut (Large)
Obama - 61.46%
McCain - 37.46%
Other - 1.08%

Connecticut (Small)
Obama - 56.87%
McCain - 41.45%
Other - 1.68%

Rhode Island (Large)
Obama - 66.02%
McCain - 31.94%
Other - 2.04%

Rhode Island (Small)
Obama - 59.20%
McCain - 38.68%
Other - 2.12%

New York (Large)
Obama - 66.28%
McCain - 32.80%
Other - 0.92%

New York (Small)
Obama - 50.32%
McCain - 47.97%
Other - 1.71%

New Jersey (Large)
Obama - 58.21%
McCain - 40.58%
Other - 1.21%

New Jersey (Small)
McCain - 52.43%
Obama - 45.80%
Other - 1.77%

Pennsylvania (Large)
Obama - 58.76%
McCain - 40.03%
Other - 1.21%

Pennsylvania (Small)
McCain - 55.10%
Obama - 43.09%
Other - 1.81%

Maryland (Large)
Obama - 66.85%
McCain - 31.59%
Other - 1.57%

Maryland (Small)
McCain - 54.89%
Obama - 43.36%
Other - 1.75%

Delaware (Large)
Obama - 69.66%
McCain - 29.07%
Other - 1.26%

Delaware (Small)
McCain - 49.85%
Obama - 49.16%
Other - 0.99%

District of Columbia (All Large)
Obama - 92.46%
McCain - 6.53%
Other - 1.01%
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2009, 06:30:45 AM »

Southeast (minus Virginia)

West Virginia (All Small)
McCain - 55.60%
Obama - 42.51%
Other - 1.89%

Kentucky (Large)
Obama - 54.39%
McCain - 44.31%
Other - 1.30%

Kentucky (Small)
McCain - 62.05%
Obama - 36.39%
Other - 1.55%

Tennessee (Large)
Obama - 53.32%
McCain - 45.49%
Other - 1.19%

Tennessee (Small)
McCain - 65.25%
Obama - 33.27%
Other - 1.48%

North Carolina (Large)
Obama - 59.15%
McCain - 39.99%
Other - 0.86%

North Carolina (Small)
McCain - 55.79%
Obama - 43.25%
Other - 0.96%

South Carolina (Large)
McCain - 53.89%
Obama - 44.80%
Other - 1.32%

South Carolina (Small)
McCain - 53.86%
Obama - 44.97%
Other - 1.16%

Georgia (Large)
Obama - 59.45%
McCain - 39.58%
Other - 0.98%

Georgia (Small)
McCain - 59.39%
Obama - 39.60%
Other - 1.01%

Florida (Large)
Obama - 53.50%
McCain - 45.56%
Other - 0.94%

Florida (Small)
McCain - 61.74%
Obama - 36.99%
Other - 1.27%

Alabama (Large)
McCain - 49.76%
Obama - 49.44%
Other - 0.80%

Alabama (Small)
McCain - 66.28%
Obama - 32.70%
Other - 1.02%

Mississippi (Large)
Obama - 69.24%
McCain - 30.26%
Other - 0.51%

Mississippi (Small)
McCain - 58.57%
Obama - 40.58%
Other - 0.85%

Louisiana (Large)
McCain - 49.99%
Obama - 48.65%
Other - 1.36%

Louisiana (Small)
McCain - 63.80%
Obama - 34.60%
Other - 1.59%

Arkansas (Large)
Obama - 55.07%
McCain - 43.52%
Other - 1.41%

Arkansas (Small)
McCain - 61.37%
Obama - 36.04%
Other - 2.60%
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2009, 07:59:51 AM »
« Edited: September 14, 2009, 12:51:01 AM by Ebowed »

West

Washington (Large)
Obama - 60.78%
McCain - 36.89%
Other - 2.33%

Washington (Small)
McCain - 51.29%
Obama - 46.10%
Other - 2.61%

Oregon (Large)
Obama - 62.38%
McCain - 34.94%
Other - 2.68%

Oregon (Small)
McCain - 50.88%
Obama - 45.93%
Other - 3.19%

California (Large)
Obama - 61.84%
McCain - 36.06%
Other - 2.10%

California (Small)
Obama - 50.32%
McCain - 47.06%
Other - 2.62%

Hawaii (Large)
Obama - 69.83%
McCain - 28.74%
Other - 1.44%

Hawaii (Small)
Obama - 76.07%
McCain - 22.08%
Other - 1.85%

Idaho (Large)
McCain - 51.63%
Obama - 45.49%
Other - 2.87%

Idaho (Small)
McCain - 64.84%
Obama - 32.29%
Other - 2.87%

Montana (All Small)
McCain - 49.49%
Obama - 47.11%
Other - 3.40%

Wyoming (All Small)
McCain - 64.78%
Obama - 32.54%
Other - 2.68%

Utah (Large)
McCain - 59.20%
Obama - 37.29%
Other - 3.51%

Utah (Small)
McCain - 68.29%
Obama - 28.16%
Other - 3.55%

Colorado (Large)
Obama - 55.68%
McCain - 42.72%
Other - 1.60%

Colorado (Small)
McCain - 51.57%
Obama - 46.70%
Other - 1.73%

Nevada (Large)
Obama - 57.77%
McCain - 40.16%
Other - 2.07%

Nevada (Small)
McCain - 57.88%
Obama - 39.12%
Other - 3.00%

Arizona (Large)
McCain - 53.22%
Obama - 45.11%

Arizona (Small)
McCain - 54.40%
Obama - 43.71%

New Mexico (Large)
Obama - 60.03%
McCain - 38.67%
Other - 1.30%

New Mexico (Small)
Obama - 55.28%
McCain - 43.42%
Other - 1.31%
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2009, 12:29:54 AM »

Midwest

Minnesota (Large)
Obama - 59.53%
McCain - 38.56%

Minnesota (Small)
McCain - 50.29%
Obama - 47.34%

Iowa (Large)
Obama - 57.67%
McCain - 40.67%

Iowa (Small)
Obama - 52.91%
McCain - 45.40%

Wisconsin (Large)
Obama - 60.16%
McCain - 38.59%

Wisconsin (Small)
Obama - 53.50%
McCain - 44.87%

Michigan (Large)
Obama - 61.36%
McCain - 36.96%

Michigan (Small)
Obama - 50.22%
McCain - 47.82%

Missouri (Large)
Obama - 57.80%
McCain - 41.05%

Missouri (Small)
McCain - 59.38%
Obama - 38.93%

Illinois (Large)
Obama - 66.74%
McCain - 32.03%

Illinois (Small)
Obama - 49.56%
McCain - 48.63%

Indiana (Large)
Obama - 57.83%
McCain - 41.20%

Indiana (Small)
McCain - 53.10%
Obama - 45.42%

Ohio (Large)
Obama - 57.38%
McCain - 41.04%

Ohio (Small)
McCain - 55.26%
Obama - 42.58%
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2009, 01:12:26 AM »

Interesting
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,759


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2009, 01:51:19 AM »

So far, Obama has done better in small counties than in large ones in four states: Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and South Carolina.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2009, 02:38:39 AM »

So far, Obama has done better in small counties than in large ones in four states: Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and South Carolina.

-Honolulu = Mormons + military?
-New Hampshire's more populous counties = suburban Boston
-MA's less populous counties have lots of colleges, maybe?
-South Carolina = more blacks in rural areas?
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,407
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2009, 07:12:30 AM »

-New Hampshire's more populous counties = suburban Boston

Yes. The less populous counties are mostly in NH-2, and aren't those areas quite progressive?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Western MA, aka where Obama broke 70%, is quite similiar to VT IIRC.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2009, 10:59:21 AM »

-MA's less populous counties have lots of colleges, maybe?

Not particularly. They're just fairly Anglo, Vermont-like rural areas (Hampshire, Franklin and Berkshire Counties) or resort islands (Dukes/Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket).

Hampshire County does contain the Five Colleges, and Williams is in Berkshire County, but Williams contributes only a negligible amount of the Berkshire County vote, and of the Five Colleges, only UMass-Amherst is particularly large. Most MA college students are in Suffolk (BU, BC, Northeastern, UMass-Boston, etc.) or Middlesex (Harvard, MIT, Tufts, Brandeis, etc.) Counties.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,759


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2009, 11:26:15 AM »

-South Carolina = more blacks in rural areas?

That, and that most of the 100,000+ counties are large, suburban ones that vote heavily Republican. Of the six large counties in SC, only two voted for Obama (Charleston and Richland). The other four were all >60% McCain: Lexington County (suburban Columbia), Greenville County (Greenville), Spartanburg County (Spartanburg), and Horry County (Myrtle Beach--suburban, snowbirds, retirees, voted for Clinton)
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2009, 05:12:02 PM »

-New Hampshire's more populous counties = suburban Boston
-MA's less populous counties have lots of colleges, maybe?

-Yes, you are thinking of Hillsborough and Rockingham.
-Only in Hampshire County.
Logged
fezzyfestoon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,204
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2009, 05:53:27 PM »

Horry County (Myrtle Beach--suburban, snowbirds, retirees, voted for Clinton)

Suburban what?  It's resort towns completely surrounded by hick country.  And the last Democrat it voted for was Jimmy Carter in '76.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2009, 05:57:09 PM »

Horry County (Myrtle Beach--suburban, snowbirds, retirees, voted for Clinton)

Suburban what?  It's resort towns completely surrounded by hick country.  And the last Democrat it voted for was Jimmy Carter in '76.

I think he meant Hillary in the Primary--the only SC county to do so.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 13, 2009, 06:00:01 PM »

States with largest difference between large and small counties:

MD   46.79
TN   39.81
GA   39.66
MO   37.2
KY   35.74

*MS,DE,AR would have made the list, but I excluded them due to having only 1 large county.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,935
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 13, 2009, 06:42:13 PM »

So far, Obama has done better in small counties than in large ones in four states: Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and South Carolina.

-Honolulu = Mormons + military?

Not quite. Suburban Honolulu has the few Republican areas in Hawaii (aside from that strange island), mostly just affluent suburbia. Also some Japanese areas, Japanese Americans tend to be fairly Republican.

Though please note McCain won a total of three precincts in Hawaii.

Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,144


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2009, 07:24:51 PM »


Really? I thought Japanese were among the most Democratic Asian-American voters, having neither the Chinese and Vietnamese anti-Communist thing nor Filipino- or Korean-style Christian conservatism.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2009, 07:29:19 PM »
« Edited: September 13, 2009, 07:33:41 PM by Verily »


Really? I thought Japanese were among the most Democratic Asian-American voters, having neither the Chinese and Vietnamese anti-Communist thing nor Filipino- or Korean-style Christian conservatism.

They are. BRTD is just bullsh**tting.

Honolulu is relatively conservative compared to the rest of Hawaii because (a) There are actual rich people who vote there (all year round), (b) The whites in Honolulu are more representative of whites on the mainland, while the whites elsewhere in Hawaii vote like whites in resort areas, (c) military installations, (d) There are more native Hawaiians in the rural areas than in Honolulu, and (e) Ethnic identity and tensions are higher in Honolulu than elsewhere in the state, prompting some level of ethnic voting that allows for ethnicity-based political machines (for both parties, but that tends to be a moderating effect on the overall vote)
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,303


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 13, 2009, 09:43:38 PM »

So far, Obama has done better in small counties than in large ones in four states: Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and South Carolina.

-Honolulu = Mormons + military?
Japanese Americans tend to be fairly Republican.


Actually they are probably the most democratic, although I am sure Indians now hold that honor.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 13, 2009, 09:54:15 PM »


Really? I thought Japanese were among the most Democratic Asian-American voters, having neither the Chinese and Vietnamese anti-Communist thing nor Filipino- or Korean-style Christian conservatism.

Not since the 1990s at least. They were probably GOP till Clinton, assuming the Japanese-American internment during the FDR era had some impact.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,303


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 13, 2009, 10:19:16 PM »


Really? I thought Japanese were among the most Democratic Asian-American voters, having neither the Chinese and Vietnamese anti-Communist thing nor Filipino- or Korean-style Christian conservatism.

Not since the 1990s at least. They were probably GOP till Clinton, assuming the Japanese-American internment during the FDR era had some impact.

Japanese Americans are one of the least religious Asian groups and Asians overall are very non religious. That would explain their voting patterns. It would be interesting to find out how they voted before the 90's.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 13, 2009, 10:27:28 PM »

States with largest difference between large and small counties:

MD   46.79
TN   39.81
GA   39.66
MO   37.2
KY   35.74

Heavily minority large counties and lily white hillbilly small counties.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,935
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 13, 2009, 11:11:22 PM »

Just something I read once. Came down to class really, Japanese Americans are rather affluent while Koreans and Chinese tend to be working class. Never read any actual income statistics or bothered to compare voting patterns of various areas though.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 14, 2009, 12:11:52 AM »

Plains

North Dakota (All Small)
McCain - 53.07%
Obama - 44.47%

South Dakota (All Small)
McCain - 53.16%
Obama - 44.75%

Nebraska (Large)
Obama - 51.54%
McCain - 46.78%

Nebraska (Small)
McCain - 64.26%
Obama - 33.72%

Kansas (Large)
McCain - 54.29%
Obama - 43.82%

Kansas (Small)
McCain - 57.88%
Obama - 40.15%

Oklahoma (Large)
McCain - 60.52%
Obama - 39.48%

Oklahoma (Small)
McCain - 69.61%
Obama - 30.39%

Texas (Large)
Obama - 49.64%
McCain - 49.32%

Texas (Small)
McCain - 66.06%
Obama - 33.06%
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 14, 2009, 12:33:00 AM »

List of counties where over 100,000 votes were cast (in order of which state had the highest proportion of statewide votes coming from said counties)*

District of Columbia - 100%
Massachusetts (Barnstable, Bristol, Essex, Hampden, Middlesex, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, Worcester) - 93.48%
California (Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno, Kern, Los Angeles, Marin, Monterey, Orange, Placer, Riverside, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francis, San Joaquin, Sain Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Tulare, Ventura) - 92.25%
New Jersey (Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Union) - 91.38%
Nevada (Clark, Washoe) - 85.92%
Arizona (Maricopa, Pima, Pinal, Yavapai) - 85.59%
Florida (Alachua, Brevard, Broward, Collier, Duval, Escambia, Hillsborough, Lake, Lee, Leon, Manatee, Marion, Miami-Dade, Orange, Osceola, Palm Beach, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk, St. Johns, St. Lucie, Sarasota, Seminole, Volusia) - 84.31%
Connecticut (Fairfield, Hartford, New Haven, New London) - 81.02%
Maryland (Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Frederick, Harford, Howard, Montgomery, Prince George's, Baltimore City) - 79.02%
New York (Suffolk, Nassau, Kings, Queens, New York, Bronx, Richmond, Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Dutchess, Albany, Saratoga, Onondaga, Monroe, Erie) - 78.73%
Colorado (Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Denver, Douglas, El Paso, Jefferson, Larimer, Weld) - 77.55%
Washington (Clark, King, Kitsap, Pierce, Snohomish, Spokane, Thurston, Whatcom) - 76.58%
Pennsylvania (Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Chester, Cumberland, Dauphin, Delaware, Erie, Lackawanna, Lancaster, Lehigh, Luzerne, Montgomery, Northampton, Philadelphia, Westmoreland) - 72.62%
Illinois (Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, Madison, St. Clair, Sangamon, Will, Winnebago) - 71.58%
Hawaii (Honolulu) - 67.64%
Utah (Davis, Salt Lake, Utah) - 66.39%
Oregon (Clackamas, Jackson, Lane, Marion, Multnomah, Washington) - 65.74%
Michigan (Genesee, Ingham, Kalamazoo, Kent, Macomb, Oakland, Saginaw, Washtenaw, Wayne) - 63.85%
Texas (Bexar, Brazoria, Collin, Dallas, Denton, El Paso, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Hidalgo, Montgomery, Nueces, Tarrant, Travis, Williamson) - 63.76%
Delaware (New Castle) - 62.19%
Ohio (Butler, Cuyahoga, Franklin, Hamilton, Lake, Lorain, Lucas, Mahoning, Montgomery, Stark, Summit, Trumbull, Warren) - 59.49%
Minnesota (Anoka, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, St. Louis, Washington) - 55.14%
Missouri (Clay, Greene, Jackson, Jefferson, St. Charles, St. Louis, St. Louis City) - 54.62%
Rhode Island (Providence) - 53.76%
New Hampshire (Hillsborough, Rockingham) - 52.40%
Nebraska (Douglas, Lancaster) - 44.20%
Oklahoma (Cleveland, Oklahoma, Tulsa) - 43.64%
South Carolina (Charleston, Greenville, Horry, Lexington, Richland, Spartanburg) - 43.35%
Tennessee (Davidson, Hamilton, Knox, Rutherford, Shelby) - 42.50%
Wisconsin (Brown, Dane, Milwaukee, Racine, Waukesha) - 40.77%
North Carolina (Buncombe, Cumberland, Durham, Forsyth, Guilford, Mecklenburg, New Hanover, Wake) - 40.59%
Kansas (Johnson, Sedgwick) - 38.59%
Louisiana (Caddo, East Baton Rouge, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Tammany) - 37.95%
Maine (Cumberland, York) - 37.55%
Georgia (Chatham, Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton, Gwinnett) - 36.77%
Alabama (Jefferson, Madison, Mobile, Montgomery) - 36.08%
Indiana (Allen, Hamilton, Lake, Marion, St. Joseph) - 35.83%
New Mexico (Bernalillo) - 34.43%
Idaho (Ada) - 27.46%
Kentucky (Fayette, Jefferson) - 26.41%
Iowa (Linn, Polk) - 21.32%
Arkansas (Pulaski) - 14.85%
Mississippi (Hinds) - 8.44%

*Does not include Virginia.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 14, 2009, 04:06:52 AM »
« Edited: September 14, 2009, 04:10:30 AM by phknrocket1k »


Really? I thought Japanese were among the most Democratic Asian-American voters, having neither the Chinese and Vietnamese anti-Communist thing nor Filipino- or Korean-style Christian conservatism.

Not since the 1990s at least. They were probably GOP till Clinton, assuming the Japanese-American internment during the FDR era had some impact.

Japanese Americans are one of the least religious Asian groups and Asians overall are very non religious. That would explain their voting patterns. It would be interesting to find out how they voted before the 90's.

Yeah, but the RR wasn't a politically potent force till like 1994 and Japanese-Americans seem to be regressing pretty fast to the mean culturally.

If I had to guess

1988-2008 - Dem
1972-1984 - GOP
Though I'm sure in the 1930s/1940s they would have been GOP, internment issues and such.
No idea before that.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.07 seconds with 13 queries.