Large counties vs. small counties (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 01:44:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Large counties vs. small counties (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Large counties vs. small counties  (Read 12718 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,782


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« on: September 13, 2009, 01:51:19 AM »
So far, Obama has done better in small counties than in large ones in four states: Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and South Carolina.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,782


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2009, 11:26:15 AM »
Quote from: bgwah on September 13, 2009, 02:38:39 AM
-South Carolina = more blacks in rural areas?

That, and that most of the 100,000+ counties are large, suburban ones that vote heavily Republican. Of the six large counties in SC, only two voted for Obama (Charleston and Richland). The other four were all >60% McCain: Lexington County (suburban Columbia), Greenville County (Greenville), Spartanburg County (Spartanburg), and Horry County (Myrtle Beach--suburban, snowbirds, retirees, voted for Clinton)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.