Acastus
csmith476
Rookie
Posts: 40
|
 |
« on: October 14, 2004, 10:05:36 AM » |
|
AuH20's logic seems solid. Bush clearly did better in this last debate than in the first. Logically then, a proportion of those who were put off by Bush's crap performance in debate #1 might be won back by watching debate #3.
However, the snap polls say that Kerry won by a margin as decisive as in the first debate. Are the snap polls just wrong? Or has the public simply come to believe that Bush can't win a debate against Kerry?
The numbers do seem to indicate the public interest is still high. But which candidate does that benefit, if any?
|
