"Strategic Vision Polls Exhibit Unusual Patterns, Possibly Indicating Fraud" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 10:37:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process
  Polling (Moderator: muon2)
  "Strategic Vision Polls Exhibit Unusual Patterns, Possibly Indicating Fraud" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: "Strategic Vision Polls Exhibit Unusual Patterns, Possibly Indicating Fraud"  (Read 8867 times)
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« on: September 25, 2009, 01:28:32 PM »

They have responded:

“First in regards to the AAPOR charges that started this blog thread. Strategic Vision did comply and provide the information to AAPOR and has electronic proof that this was done on June 19th. We did this because they claimed a complaint has been filed against us and they were investigating us, even though we have never been a member of their organization. We were then contacted by AAPOR and told that while they had requested this it was not done in a timely enough fashion so they were going to issue a press release reprimanding us. Please remember again we are not members of their association. At no time did they request additional information as they now allege they had. Had they done so we would have provided them the information. Rather as I stated we were told we were going to be reprimanded by AAPOR despite responding to them. We have requested from them repeatedly since this investigation is all about transparency according to them, a copy of the complaint. They have refused and stated their bylaws donot require them to show us the complaint but we must respond to them or be rep rimanded. Further several members of this panel that voted to investigate us serve as consultants for one of our competitors and indeed contacted a client several days prior to this being released telling our client that they should switch to the company they consult for.

Secondly in regards to Nate Silver’s statements, we categorically deny them and will refute them. We have a call into our attorney on this and fully intend to take action that will vindicate us. I wish Nate had contacted me directly yesterday when he began this tirade, I could have answered his questions fully to his satisfaction prior to damage being done to our reputation. Now that he has made these accusations and posted them online, I must and will defend our company’s reputation through all legal avenues available. The reason that we are going the legal route is he has attempted to do severe damage to our reputation and what is he going to do when we disprove him just say I am sorry. That isn’t enough at this point.”

http://blogs.tampabay.com/buzz/2009/09/nate-silver-pollster-may-be-fraud.html

Silver could possibly be sued for libel, because there's no doubt this would affect their reputation.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2009, 08:07:16 PM »

Sorry, SV, don't believe it. The evidence is pretty damning (and additional things that Silver didn't investigate, like all sample sizes ending in even numbers, make it worse). This is just bluster.

Um, Rasmussen uses all even sample sizes(500,1000, etc.). That doesn't mean anything.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.