German Election Results Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:11:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  German Election Results Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20
Author Topic: German Election Results Thread  (Read 117947 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #325 on: October 06, 2009, 10:25:01 AM »

And Delbrück and Holweide switch sides compared to the locals.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #326 on: October 06, 2009, 11:08:25 AM »
« Edited: October 06, 2009, 11:11:15 AM by it is our duty to be mental »

Munich

Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #327 on: October 06, 2009, 11:16:03 AM »

Though as a matter of fact, shaded party maps are already available by borough or precinct.
There's no turnout map and their winner map is unshaded, so that might be worthwhile endeavours.











That last map has changed a fair bit compared to 2005. Munich 2005 for the Left still looked a lot like the old West German PDS.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #328 on: October 06, 2009, 11:18:55 AM »

My apologies. There is a turnout map.



All of these also available by precinct, btw.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #329 on: October 06, 2009, 12:09:51 PM »

Wiesbaden

Darmstadt (navigate via Darstellungsbereich, using the "gesamt" results)

Dortmund (page 8 of pdf has boroughs and local constituencies. A borough map is on page four, while a map of the constituencies is on page 2 of this.

Offenbach'll require some basic math to present even without postals. I might do that later tonight, actually. Kassel webpage is once again wholly uninformative.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #330 on: October 06, 2009, 01:58:52 PM »

Offenbach
Format is turnout SPD-CDU-FDP-Greens-Left. Remember that turnout is day voters by eligible voters, just as party strength is day vote only.

11 43.4 27.7-16.6-12.3-17.9-16.6
12 44.8 27.5-21.1-  9.8-17.3-15.7
13 46.3 27.4-20.5-  9.4-18.1-17.0
14 48.0 22.7-20.1-15.8-17.2-15.2
15 49.6 21.2-21.8-17.8-18.4-14.2
16 46.8 26.1-20.0-12.9-17.7-15.4
21 47.4 24.5-20.5-13.0-21.3-13.4
22 49.8 25.9-29.6-14.1-  9.6-13.4
23 52.0 25.6-23.1-11.2-18.0-14.6
24 51.6 26.4-24.2-13.8-13.9-13.9
25 49.7 25.4-26.8-14.7-13.2-12.7
26 56.1 26.6-22.2-16.1-15.5-11.8
31 53.6 24.9-28.0-14.1-12.3-12.3
32 56.6 28.2-26.1-14.7-11.5-12.3
33 57.9 22.8-33.9-16.6-10.3-  9.3
41 43.1 34.3-24.7-  9.2-  7.4-12.7
42 68.0 20.2-29.4-21.0-17.2-  6.9
43 58.2 21.6-31.5-17.4-12.6-  9.5
44 60.4 20.7-32.6-18.8-15.1-  7.5

Left result across the city proper is hilariously uniform. That 68.0 for turnout in Waldheim ain't no misprint. Remember that 33, 43 and 22 are the largest individual units here before you marvel at the sea of red.
Day votes, total: Turnout 52.3, CDU 27.1, SPD 24.5, FDP 14.9, Greens 14.0, Left 12.3
Versus Postals: CDU 34.4, SPD 20.9, FDP 16.3, Greens 13.8, Left 9.1
for a total of: Turnout 66.1, CDU 28.6, SPD 23.8, FDP 15.2, Greens 14.0, Left 11.6
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #331 on: October 06, 2009, 02:58:34 PM »

Essen by neighborhood,  map

Duisburg by borough or constituency, borough map will do as the only constituency map I've found (didn't spend that long at it) is superimposed on a street map and thus a huge pdf.

Düsseldorf only has precinct and city results up (well, and the two Bundestag constituencies. Not worth much.) And not even a readily apparent way to calculate higher-level results yourself. Probably will have to wait until the next statistical yearbook or something - I know I've found old borough results for Düsseldorf in the past.

Hanover by neighborhood. Pdf basically has our maps already. I think a shaded winner map is missing, though.

Bremen maps. I love their category of "neighborhood not classified - under 1000 inhabitants". Raw data for any of the state's four tiers (including the two cities) be here.

Leipzig by neighborhood. I dunno, I would prefer a borough map here, but there you go. I hope this Neighborhood map is up to date. It's not an official source (as you can see.) There seems to be an issue at Grünau. In case someone (me perhaps? Would have to be next weekend) wants to go to the trouble, this identifies which neighborhoods belong to which borough. So does this overtly huge wiki map which also clarifies things in Grünau.

Dresden requires more work for the weekend. Link has precinct results, it just so happens that precincts are named by the neighborhoods they're in. Order of things seems to be day votes Dresden I, postals Dresden I in same order, day votes Dresden II, postals Dresden II. (And then municipalities outside the city but within Dresden II constituency.) map be here.

Nuremberg by neighborhood. Results page 17, blank map page 18, loads of maps after that.

Stuttgart by neighborhood. Map.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #332 on: October 06, 2009, 03:10:53 PM »

...and there goes what little free time I had left for the next week or so! Cheesy
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #333 on: October 06, 2009, 03:18:31 PM »

Any other places you're particularly interested in? Grin
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #334 on: October 06, 2009, 03:37:40 PM »

Any other places you're particularly interested in? Grin

Possibly... but I think I'll try and get through these first Grin
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #335 on: October 07, 2009, 12:27:19 PM »
« Edited: October 07, 2009, 01:20:33 PM by it is our duty to be mental »

Leipzig by neighborhood. I dunno, I would prefer a borough map here, but there you go. I hope this Neighborhood map is up to date. It's not an official source (as you can see.) There seems to be an issue at Grünau. In case someone (me perhaps? Would have to be next weekend) wants to go to the trouble, this identifies which neighborhoods belong to which borough. So does this overtly huge wiki map which also clarifies things in Grünau.
Just noticed that calculating these by borough could only be an approximation. We have the number of reg.d voters by neighborhood, but turnout and vote shares as percentages only. I think I'll pass.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

working on it. noticed i'll need to combine some areas figure out what's combined in the map already. The descriptions in precinct names are more detailed. Certainly possible (that is , done) for Dresden I.

EDIT: Idiot me. This would have been easier if I'd looked at precinct numbers instead of precinct names. Oh well. At least I had everything right.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #336 on: October 07, 2009, 02:48:29 PM »

Düsseldorf is a shame because my brother lived there for a while and it'd have been fun to have spammed his email with maps Grin
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #337 on: October 08, 2009, 06:58:41 PM »



Spot the former borough of Wedding!
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #338 on: October 10, 2009, 04:05:59 AM »

Hint: Use the leading party map. (It actually extends into the two Green districts south of it too, though.)

The Central PDS Country is making the Green distribution look weird. And lol at leaving Kreuzberg SE-Stralau blank on the CDU map.


Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #339 on: October 10, 2009, 06:09:11 AM »
« Edited: October 10, 2009, 06:12:17 AM by General Secretary Al »

(It actually extends into the two Green districts south of it too, though.)

Details, details. I still laughed on finding out, anyway. Grin

Talking of which, quite how evenly distributed the Berlin SPD vote is seems a little strange - especially when compared to other large cities. And when looking at the patterns of the other parties in Berlin, obviously.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Presumably that area has a lot of DDR-era social housing?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Grin
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #340 on: October 10, 2009, 06:25:16 AM »

(It actually extends into the two Green districts south of it too, though.)

Details, details. I still laughed on finding out, anyway. Grin
Hm? The constituencies got redrawn once since the district reform. The former borough boundaries were breached in that. The new Mitte had included seven constituencies before - two somewhat undersized ones each in Mitte proper and Tiergarten, three somewhat undersized ones in the Wedding. Add the area up, and it was closer to six seats than to seven. The southeastern Wedding seat basically got distributed among all its neighbors. So there's parts of the old Wedding in those two neighboring constituencies as well.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Presumably that area has a lot of DDR-era social housing?[/quote]Not sure if social housing is the right word. Any new building project larger than two or three housing units in the DDR was by the state, basically. It's not that private homeownership or even private renting was illegal or anything, it's just that subsidized credit for it wasn't available at all, with inevitable results (read: decaying inner cities. That by the 80s and 90s often turned into artsy, if at least initially in a very downmarket way, enclaves).

The area were dealing with was bombed quite flat and thus has a lot of 50s and 60s government-built housing. Being centrally located and not of pisspoor quality, it's quite "desirable", in the low turnover sense of the word.

Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #341 on: October 10, 2009, 06:32:02 AM »

Details, details. I still laughed on finding out, anyway. Grin
Hm? The constituencies got redrawn once since the district reform. The former borough boundaries were breached in that. The new Mitte had included seven constituencies before - two somewhat undersized ones each in Mitte proper and Tiergarten, three somewhat undersized ones in the Wedding. Add the area up, and it was closer to six seats than to seven. The southeastern Wedding seat basically got distributed among all its neighbors. So there's parts of the old Wedding in those two neighboring constituencies as well.[/quote]

I know. That's why I wrote "details, details". I don't care if it's strictly accurate - it's still hilarious Grin

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Ah, alright. What sort of people live there?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #342 on: October 10, 2009, 06:40:47 AM »

The same people who lived there twenty years ago when the world was still whole and the wall was still standing, of course.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #343 on: October 10, 2009, 06:44:12 AM »

I know. That's why I wrote "details, details". I don't care if it's strictly accurate - it's still hilarious Grin
You know what?

Precinct maps from page 28
Precinct results

I'm sure you can find yourself a map of the former boundaries and do the math (sans postals) yourself. Grin
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #344 on: October 10, 2009, 06:48:32 AM »

I know. That's why I wrote "details, details". I don't care if it's strictly accurate - it's still hilarious Grin
You know what?

Precinct maps from page 28
Precinct results

I'm sure you can find yourself a map of the former boundaries and do the math (sans postals) yourself. Grin

Haha - I might do that at some point, yes.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #345 on: October 10, 2009, 06:57:35 AM »

I know. That's why I wrote "details, details". I don't care if it's strictly accurate - it's still hilarious Grin
You know what?

Precinct maps from page 28
Precinct results

I'm sure you can find yourself a map of the former boundaries and do the math (sans postals) yourself. Grin

Haha - I might do that at some point, yes.
With postals, actually. The list of which precincts are grouped for the postal precincts is at the end of the document with the precinct maps, and I seem to recall it's actually a law that precinct and postal precinct boundaries have to respect the Wall so that the Landeswahlleiter can continue to release East Berlin and West Berlin election results.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #346 on: October 10, 2009, 08:09:18 AM »

Offenbach:

Logged
CO-OWL
OWL
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 266
Germany


Political Matrix
E: 0.00, S: 0.10

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #347 on: October 10, 2009, 02:18:40 PM »

I had a look over changes in registered voters numbers... pretty fascinating.

Federally +0.4
...
Bavaria +1.5
...
Declines in Hof, Weiden, Bayreuth, Kulmbach, Bad Kissingen (but not Coburg) with Hof at -3.1% and the others below -2%.
...

I tried to find an explanation for the odd Coburg numbers (turnout below 70%, number of registered voters growing while population is declining).
The answer is very simple: Compared to the preliminary result the number of registered voters went down by 4,815 in the final result (No idea, how they made up the preliminary numbers). Hence we have Coburg at -1.0% with turnout about 71%.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #348 on: October 10, 2009, 05:05:38 PM »



Stuttgart. SPD nearly came fourth (though only just missed out on second).
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #349 on: October 10, 2009, 07:27:04 PM »
« Edited: October 11, 2009, 06:15:19 AM by General Secretary Al »



Duisburg. I had fun modifying the outline map for this.

Edited for lolworthy error.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 13 queries.