Northeast Assembly Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:39:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Northeast Assembly Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
Author Topic: Northeast Assembly Thread  (Read 380676 times)
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« on: March 10, 2010, 10:44:29 PM »
Amendment 1:Aye

Amendment 2: Aye
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2010, 10:47:32 PM »
Quote from: cinyc on March 10, 2010, 10:46:42 PM

The amendment vote is closed.  We're now voting on final passage of the bill (which is Amendment 1, since it won a majority).  A simple aye or nay will do.

Ooh, sorry.

Aye
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2010, 04:05:30 PM »
I don't think that it's right that we can ban unions completely--that sounds fishy. Because if we can ban unions it seems logical that we can violate people's right to associate, meaning that we can ban orchestras, ban newspapers, etc. Yes, I know what I just said a slippery slope argument, but we should not set a precedent for future generations to come. The right to free association is one of the most integral aspects in a free society, and we ought not diminish it.

That being said, I dislike unions. We should diminish their power, or at the very least, we should protect the rights of the employer so that the employer does not (legally) have to pander down to the unions.

With this bill, I will vote nay, but get rid of the outright ban on unions and it's likely I'll vote for it.
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2010, 06:12:43 PM »
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2010, 05:15:05 PM »
Aye
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2010, 03:20:33 PM »
Quote from: cinyc on March 20, 2010, 02:05:48 PM
Then why not just add "justifiable" somewhere in the bill such as:

The Northeast Region shall protect the right of any citizen to use lethal, justifiable force to protect his life, liberty, or property.


I'd support that amendment
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2010, 07:49:26 PM »
Aye.
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2010, 06:58:22 PM »
Aye
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2010, 10:51:48 PM »
I apologize for my absence, speaker.
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2010, 10:55:40 PM »
And I oppose the proposed name change.
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #10 on: March 29, 2010, 07:56:34 AM »
Nay
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #11 on: March 30, 2010, 10:39:28 PM »
I endorse this bill.
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #12 on: April 02, 2010, 08:47:47 AM »
Militia Bill: Aye
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #13 on: April 02, 2010, 10:51:55 AM »
Quote from: Dallasfan65 on April 02, 2010, 10:35:17 AM
Amendment on the Freedom to Drive Act: Nay.
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2010, 04:31:11 PM »
Aye (for the Freedom To Drive Act)
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #15 on: April 06, 2010, 03:28:49 PM »
Aye
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #16 on: April 07, 2010, 03:21:35 PM »
Ooh, sorry I didn't see this already. Anyway, my proposed CJO Term Amendment will make the CJO more accountable to the legislature, and the people.
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #17 on: April 08, 2010, 08:55:56 PM »
Quote from: cinyc on April 07, 2010, 04:09:33 PM
Quote from: hantheguitarman on April 07, 2010, 03:21:35 PM
Ooh, sorry I didn't see this already. Anyway, my proposed CJO Term Amendment will make the CJO more accountable to the legislature, and the people.

Is it supposed to apply retroactively to the current CJO, who has a number of months left on his term?

I admit that the amendment is vague, so I will accept a friendly amendment to mine that grandfathers the current CJO from this proposed legislation.
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #18 on: April 10, 2010, 03:34:42 PM »
I deem the amendment friendly.
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #19 on: April 11, 2010, 09:23:40 PM »
Nay
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #20 on: April 12, 2010, 09:54:25 PM »
CJO Term Amendment: Aye
Seats number Amendment: Aye
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #21 on: April 16, 2010, 08:09:37 PM »
Nay
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #22 on: April 18, 2010, 10:55:06 AM »
Nay
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #23 on: April 24, 2010, 08:44:15 PM »
[1] Dallasfan65
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025
« Reply #24 on: April 26, 2010, 08:53:41 PM »
Quote from: Dallasfan65 on April 26, 2010, 08:47:10 AM
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The bill is amended to read as such.

I motion shortening debate to 24 hours.

I second this motion.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.