Rumours!

[bgwah]

I guess I'll have to take your word for it.

[Sbane]

I guess I'll have to take your word for it.

That is exactly what happened. If you read all the PM's in context, you would come to the same conclusion. Al never said it was a good idea, he merely passed the idea on to us so we could decide as a party.

[Sewer]

I guess I'll have to take your word for it.

That is exactly what happened. If you read all the PM's in context, you would come to the same conclusion. Al never said it was a good idea, he merely passed the idea on to us so we could decide as a party.

this

[ilikeverin]

I'd say the predominant mood at the time of the reception of the message within the LNF was "".

[Ban my account ffs!]

I'd say the predominant mood at the time of the reception of the message within the LNF was "".

*hughughug*

[Filuwaúrdjan]

I'd say the predominant mood at the time of the reception of the message within the LNF was "".

You mean it still isn't?

[Bacon King]

Maybe it's just me but I don't see how the LNF did anything particularly bad here. I think it was within Al's right to forward the PM to the rest of his party rather than simply reject it outright, considering that the LNF has that "everyone is a chairman!" leadership and all.

In my opinion, the foul play here is solely on the part of Hamilton and those who enabled his conspiracies.

[Alexander Hamilton]

In my opinion, the foul play here is solely on the part of Hamilton and those who enabled his conspiracies.

This.

[Marokai Backbeat]

Maybe it's just me but I don't see how the LNF did anything particularly bad here. I think it was within Al's right to forward the PM to the rest of his party rather than simply reject it outright, considering that the LNF has that "everyone is a chairman!" leadership and all.

In my opinion, the foul play here is solely on the part of Hamilton and those who enabled his conspiracies.

I'm not trying to blame the LNF for anything, the only thing I remarked on them about was the fact that they act like the joke party. (That's not an insult.) They claim to be around to not take the game seriously and to just have fun, yet they entertain the notion of disgusting and cutthroat election tactics whenever they come their way. They didn't accept of course, it was interrupted and many members opposed it, but some supported it, and were tempted enough to actually consider it, which would seem to directly contradict their supposed message. I think the point here, if there ever was one about the LNF to begin with, is that they're largely no different than anyone else here, despite what they might say.

Nevertheless I'm not trying to make this about the LNF, they can do whatever they want. My gripe was with PiT and Hamilton. Hamilton who came up with the schemes, PiT who went along with them and fought so hard for them and defended Hamilton, willing to throw his own party members under the bus for his own benefit.

This is not hard to understand. I thought it was quite clear we weren't going after the LNF.

PiT, unfortunately, is now MIA. Hamilton has apparently taken it upon himself to play the valiant defender of him and throw himself in front of PiT to protect him. At it's heart, this was a (relatively) straightforward story of the tactics of PiT and Hamilton's assistance in them, but it has somehow become a discussion on Hamilton and the LNF, something it was never meant to be.

[Countess Anya of the North Parish]

PiT is not MIA he mad a remark on this thread.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Marokai stop acting like you know when you don't. You don't know me.

[Marokai Backbeat]

Marokai stop acting like you know when you don't. You don't know me.

What I do know is that you're someone who takes this game way too seriously.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Marokai stop acting like you know when you don't. You don't know me.

What I do know is that you're someone who takes this game way too seriously.

No I don't. If I took this game seriously I wouldn't say stuff just for the hell of it and call everyone out, I'd put on a bs facade and act friendly towards everyone.

I do take my job as a Rep. seriously. That's it.

[Franzl]

Umm, lol?

[Associate Justice PiT]

PiT is not MIA he mad a remark on this thread.

     Two remarks, now three with this one.

[titaniumtux]

LNF FTW!

[Hatman 🍁]

Was there some deleted post about me?

I am happy to come clean about anything I may have said in our discussion. I think it may have been about PiT promising to keep me on as SoFA if he wins. I am obviously going to vote for someone who wants to keep me on a SoFA, it is one of my bigger issues. There was some rumours that had he won the last election, I would've been toast.

Not that I have anything against the ticket (well, I guess I do now), as I consider Smid to be a friend of mine, and would have had no problem voting for a ticket with him on it.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Was there some deleted post about me?

I am happy to come clean about anything I may have said in our discussion. I think it may have been about PiT promising to keep me on as SoFA if he wins. I am obviously going to vote for someone who wants to keep me on a SoFA, it is one of my bigger issues. There was some rumours that had he won the last election, I would've been toast.

Not that I have anything against the ticket (well, I guess I do now), as I consider Smid to be a friend of mine, and would have had no problem voting for a ticket with him on it.

Sewer Socialist posted a PM involving you contradicting what you started this thread saying.

[Purple State]

Was there some deleted post about me?

I am happy to come clean about anything I may have said in our discussion. I think it may have been about PiT promising to keep me on as SoFA if he wins. I am obviously going to vote for someone who wants to keep me on a SoFA, it is one of my bigger issues. There was some rumours that had he won the last election, I would've been toast.

Not that I have anything against the ticket (well, I guess I do now), as I consider Smid to be a friend of mine, and would have had no problem voting for a ticket with him on it.

I believe any candidate would keep you on as SoFA. Who else wants to be SoFA or could be as good of a SoFA?

[Alexander Hamilton]

Was there some deleted post about me?

I am happy to come clean about anything I may have said in our discussion. I think it may have been about PiT promising to keep me on as SoFA if he wins. I am obviously going to vote for someone who wants to keep me on a SoFA, it is one of my bigger issues. There was some rumours that had he won the last election, I would've been toast.

Not that I have anything against the ticket (well, I guess I do now), as I consider Smid to be a friend of mine, and would have had no problem voting for a ticket with him on it.

I believe any candidate would keep you on as SoFA. Who else wants to be SoFA or could be as good of a SoFA?

I know of a few.

[Associate Justice PiT]

Was there some deleted post about me?

I am happy to come clean about anything I may have said in our discussion. I think it may have been about PiT promising to keep me on as SoFA if he wins. I am obviously going to vote for someone who wants to keep me on a SoFA, it is one of my bigger issues. There was some rumours that had he won the last election, I would've been toast.

Not that I have anything against the ticket (well, I guess I do now), as I consider Smid to be a friend of mine, and would have had no problem voting for a ticket with him on it.

I believe any candidate would keep you on as SoFA. Who else wants to be SoFA or could be as good of a SoFA?

I know of a few.

     I know one person in particular who said he'd like to be SoFA, though he ultimately said that he'd be fine with Earl staying on.

[Purple State]

Was there some deleted post about me?

I am happy to come clean about anything I may have said in our discussion. I think it may have been about PiT promising to keep me on as SoFA if he wins. I am obviously going to vote for someone who wants to keep me on a SoFA, it is one of my bigger issues. There was some rumours that had he won the last election, I would've been toast.

Not that I have anything against the ticket (well, I guess I do now), as I consider Smid to be a friend of mine, and would have had no problem voting for a ticket with him on it.

I believe any candidate would keep you on as SoFA. Who else wants to be SoFA or could be as good of a SoFA?

I know of a few.

     I know one person in particular who said he'd like to be SoFA, though he ultimately said that he'd be fine with Earl staying on.

I am almost positive then that you were the only one considering it. I highly doubt Lief would not retain Earl after he already did once.

[Hatman 🍁]

Was there some deleted post about me?

I am happy to come clean about anything I may have said in our discussion. I think it may have been about PiT promising to keep me on as SoFA if he wins. I am obviously going to vote for someone who wants to keep me on a SoFA, it is one of my bigger issues. There was some rumours that had he won the last election, I would've been toast.

Not that I have anything against the ticket (well, I guess I do now), as I consider Smid to be a friend of mine, and would have had no problem voting for a ticket with him on it.

Sewer Socialist posted a PM involving you contradicting what you started this thread saying.

Our discussions were not about an "alliance" per se, so what I said still stands true.

[Associate Justice PiT]

Was there some deleted post about me?

I am happy to come clean about anything I may have said in our discussion. I think it may have been about PiT promising to keep me on as SoFA if he wins. I am obviously going to vote for someone who wants to keep me on a SoFA, it is one of my bigger issues. There was some rumours that had he won the last election, I would've been toast.

Not that I have anything against the ticket (well, I guess I do now), as I consider Smid to be a friend of mine, and would have had no problem voting for a ticket with him on it.

I believe any candidate would keep you on as SoFA. Who else wants to be SoFA or could be as good of a SoFA?

I know of a few.

     I know one person in particular who said he'd like to be SoFA, though he ultimately said that he'd be fine with Earl staying on.

I am almost positive then that you were the only one considering it. I highly doubt Lief would not retain Earl after he already did once.

     I actually was leaning against appointing that person anyway, for reasons that could be embarrassing to that person if revealed. So it is likely that I would have retained Earl regardless.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Was there some deleted post about me?

I am happy to come clean about anything I may have said in our discussion. I think it may have been about PiT promising to keep me on as SoFA if he wins. I am obviously going to vote for someone who wants to keep me on a SoFA, it is one of my bigger issues. There was some rumours that had he won the last election, I would've been toast.

Not that I have anything against the ticket (well, I guess I do now), as I consider Smid to be a friend of mine, and would have had no problem voting for a ticket with him on it.

Sewer Socialist posted a PM involving you contradicting what you started this thread saying.

Our discussions were not about an "alliance" per se, so what I said still stands true.

No, just shared interests.