NYC 2009 Mayoral Race OFFICIAL RESULTS THREAD: INTERESTING NEWS TO REPORT
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 12:43:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NYC 2009 Mayoral Race OFFICIAL RESULTS THREAD: INTERESTING NEWS TO REPORT
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]
Author Topic: NYC 2009 Mayoral Race OFFICIAL RESULTS THREAD: INTERESTING NEWS TO REPORT  (Read 14978 times)
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #100 on: November 05, 2009, 05:22:01 AM »

True, you have to assume it takes a reasonable amount of managerial competence to get a hold of 16 billion dollars of personal wealth in the first place.  Even if he stole it, he'd have to be a pretty good thief.

Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,471
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #101 on: November 05, 2009, 05:30:15 AM »

Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.), who mulled a race against Bloomberg, noted Obama’s multiple trips on behalf of Corzine and wondered if they could have been better spent in New York.

To this, a White House official shot back: “Maybe Anthony Weiner should have manned-up and run against Michael Bloomberg.”

But Weiner also said the failure wasn’t just Obama’s, but rather represented an indictment of a wider Democratic establishment that could have helped turn an apparently winnable race.

“The sad truth is that we had no effective state party help,” he said. “It’s worth remembering that four years ago, [Democratic strategist and Bloomberg adviser] Howard Wolfson was on the party payroll to help out. This year, they were invisible.”



Bastards.
By doing nothing they have made it easier for New York City to undergo four more years of King Bloomberg.

Please,  I hate Bloomberg as a person but he is a decent administrator. This city sucked under the rule of un-skilled people like Thompson.  In bad economic times I do not want a failed bureaucrat running the city.

A failed bureaucrat running the city would be better for the arts.
Logged
patrick1
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #102 on: November 05, 2009, 08:15:54 AM »

Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.), who mulled a race against Bloomberg, noted Obama’s multiple trips on behalf of Corzine and wondered if they could have been better spent in New York.

To this, a White House official shot back: “Maybe Anthony Weiner should have manned-up and run against Michael Bloomberg.”

But Weiner also said the failure wasn’t just Obama’s, but rather represented an indictment of a wider Democratic establishment that could have helped turn an apparently winnable race.

“The sad truth is that we had no effective state party help,” he said. “It’s worth remembering that four years ago, [Democratic strategist and Bloomberg adviser] Howard Wolfson was on the party payroll to help out. This year, they were invisible.”



Bastards.
By doing nothing they have made it easier for New York City to undergo four more years of King Bloomberg.

Please,  I hate Bloomberg as a person but he is a decent administrator. This city sucked under the rule of un-skilled people like Thompson.  In bad economic times I do not want a failed bureaucrat running the city.

A failed bureaucrat running the city would be better for the arts.

Funny. Of course it would be. I'd gladly get mugged so I can see a crucifix floating in a vat of piss or one made out of elephant $hit Smiley
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #103 on: November 05, 2009, 12:17:22 PM »

I voted for Bloomberg.

**ducks**
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #104 on: November 05, 2009, 01:10:14 PM »

Thompson seems to have polled a plurality on the Democratic line. For those interested in such things.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #105 on: November 05, 2009, 01:13:29 PM »


Welcome to the club. I would have if I lived in NYC too.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #106 on: November 05, 2009, 01:15:10 PM »

Thompson seems to have polled a plurality on the Democratic line. For those interested in such things.

Guess that means the ordering of the lines is going to stay the same.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #107 on: November 05, 2009, 01:15:53 PM »

Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #108 on: November 05, 2009, 01:25:35 PM »

Results at block level...

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/11/04/nyregion/mayor-vote.html?th&emc=th

Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #109 on: November 05, 2009, 02:41:53 PM »


Muy excellante
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #110 on: November 05, 2009, 02:47:51 PM »

Btw, if you want to have some fun - the NYC has ED maps here down to the block

My ED went from 71-23 Bloomberg (2009) to 60-33 Bloomberg (2009).

It voted 87-12 Obama in 2008 and a couple of percent less for Kerry in 2004.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #111 on: November 05, 2009, 06:38:22 PM »

The last part of the very basic AD analysis...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Progressive
jro660
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #112 on: November 05, 2009, 06:40:49 PM »

I don't get the " (n%) Bloomberg (#), Thompson (#)" thing. Can someone explain it to me.

P.S.
Would Weiner have beaten Bloomberg?
Who will be the 2013 GOP and Dem nominees?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #113 on: November 05, 2009, 06:42:31 PM »

I don't get the " (n%) Bloomberg (#), Thompson (#)" thing. Can someone explain it to me.

The percentage is a census variable (say over 29% Italian). The Bloomberg and Thompson numbers are the number of Assembly districts that fit the census variable that were won by each candidate.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #114 on: November 05, 2009, 11:56:17 PM »

Bloomberg bought the Mayoralty.

If he didn't have unlimited resources behind him, I doubt he would have won again.

Amusing that a Mitt Romney fan would complain about a different candidate spending money from his own fortune.

For anyone to coerce city council into changing the law to allow him to run again and then spend $100,000,000 on his campaign shows unbridled vanity.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 12 queries.