Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 23, 2019, 06:11:53 am
News: 2020 Presidential Predictions (General) are now active.

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  How many seats will the Democrats lose (net) in the House?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Print
Poll
Question: Hows many seats will the Democrats lose (net) in the House?
#1None  
#21-4  
#35-9  
#410-17  
#518-22  
#623-44  
#745 or more  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 112

Author Topic: How many seats will the Democrats lose (net) in the House?  (Read 40393 times)
The love that set me free
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 86,868
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 29, 2009, 01:03:26 pm »

I'll say about 10-15. The GOP is still anathema in many parts of the country, any gains will have to come almost exclusively from the south.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,353
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 29, 2009, 01:10:58 pm »

I'd say 20-25.
Logged
Vepres
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,033
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 29, 2009, 02:18:43 pm »

I'll say about 10-15. The GOP is still anathema in many parts of the country, any gains will have to come almost exclusively from the south.

Actually, they have real room for growth in the industrial Midwest and the Mountain West. The industrial Midwest is in decline, and they have mostly Democrats in office at the moment. In the Mountain West, there is lots of anger about growing federal power and government spending. The leadership of the GOP understands they need to run moderates, the base just has to start listening. Will they? I don't know.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 62,506
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 29, 2009, 02:54:18 pm »

Twenty million billion.

---

It's too early to say, obviously. The only things that are clear is that the pattern of Democratic gains which started (more or less) wi' the Chandler by-election is going to end, and the swing will be higher than average in most of the South. We'll have a better idea by the summer (that's the point at which it became clear in 2006, for those who had eyes to see, that the House was going to fall). Until then, all we're doing is throwing random numbers around, and often those that look pleasing to us. Confirmation bias is the devil of election prediction, and we are all vulnerable to it.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,961
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: November 29, 2009, 03:03:17 pm »


That is around where I am predicting, like 22-27 though.
Logged
dwkulcsar
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 72
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 29, 2009, 03:24:06 pm »

I'd say 10-17, and Alan Grayson (FL-8) is not going to be one of them. Grayson's detractors are in the upper part of his district, who did not vote for him anyways. He will win the Orlando and Orange County part of his district. Grayson has alot of cash and will not have a problem spending it to keep himself in office.

The GOP has put forth some very weak possible contenders, the only one that may be worth it is State Rep. Kurt Kelly, but he is from Ocala, and may not sell as well as Grayson can where the population is which is Orlando-Lake County.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,475


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: November 29, 2009, 03:48:38 pm »

I'll say about 10-15. The GOP is still anathema in many parts of the country, any gains will have to come almost exclusively from the south.

Actually, they have real room for growth in the industrial Midwest and the Mountain West. The industrial Midwest is in decline, and they have mostly Democrats in office at the moment. In the Mountain West, there is lots of anger about growing federal power and government spending. The leadership of the GOP understands they need to run moderates, the base just has to start listening. Will they? I don't know.

How many seats is the Mountain west really? They will probably lose that Idaho seat and that New Mexico seat as well as CO-4. But for it to be a real wave election and for the Republicans to take over congress they would need to win AZ-5, NV-3, CA-11. At this moment I don't see them winning either of them. But if health care doesn't pass, or the economy worsens, all bets are off. The democrats may have lost a lot of support in exurban/rural west but the good news for them is that not a lot of people live there.
Logged
Wiz in Wis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,511


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: November 30, 2009, 02:21:21 pm »

At this point, not enough to win either chamber, or even really come close in the House. A good number of the 2006/2008 pickups were seats that leaned D, like IA-1, the CT seats, the PA seats, The NY seats, NOVA, Denver Burbs, NM-1, FL22. I don't think they lose that many. Given that 2010 will force a number of states to redistrict that are pretty much gerrymandered to give the GOP a leg up, I doubt that regaining control of the House is in the cards barring some collapse the likes of which have not been postulated (15% + unemployment, huge clusterflock in Afghnistan, Giant Democratic child mollesting scandal and coverup).
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,168
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: December 04, 2009, 02:11:00 am »

they will gain about 23
Logged
nkpatel1279
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1,714
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: December 04, 2009, 10:27:46 am »

Democrats will pick up DE-AL,IL-10,LA-2 and PA-6.
Democrats will have a tough time holding onto.
1)AL-2
2)AL-5
3)FL-8
4)ID-1
5)LA-3
6)MD-1
7)MI-7
8)NJ-3
9)NM-2
10)OH-1
11)OH-15
12)VA-2
13)VA-5

Democrats loose about 10 seats.
Logged
Cory Booker
olawakandi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26,592
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: December 08, 2009, 04:49:21 pm »

Wave election net lose about 26 or 33 seats, but for now 10-17
Logged
timmer123
Full Member
***
Posts: 139


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: December 12, 2009, 11:57:21 pm »

Only time will tell on this.  We talk about 1994 a lot, but remember that nobody saw the 52 seat loss the Dems incurred coming.  They were completely blindsided.

It's gonna depend on the economic situation of the country, and other variables.  15 seat minimum pick up.. but wouldn't be surprised to see upwards of 30.
Logged
Mr.Phips
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,837


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: December 13, 2009, 12:25:15 am »

Only time will tell on this.  We talk about 1994 a lot, but remember that nobody saw the 52 seat loss the Dems incurred coming.  They were completely blindsided.

It's gonna depend on the economic situation of the country, and other variables.  15 seat minimum pick up.. but wouldn't be surprised to see upwards of 30.

The difference this time is that Democrats expect to get their asses kicked next year. 
Logged
Cory Booker
olawakandi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26,592
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: December 14, 2009, 12:15:12 pm »

I think the fewest number of seats the Dems will have is 225.  I don't see the republicans gaining more than 210.  The ousted Dems will be Dems who don't vote for Obama's budget anyway.  They are there for the numbers.
Logged
Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24,629


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: December 14, 2009, 02:46:53 pm »

If the election were held today, they would lose 65 to 70 seats. The GOP would win the highest percentage of the Congressional vote since the 1920s.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6,694


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: December 14, 2009, 03:09:46 pm »

Democrats will pick up DE-AL,IL-10,LA-2 and PA-6.
Democrats will have a tough time holding onto.
1)AL-2
2)AL-5
3)FL-8
4)ID-1
5)LA-3
6)MD-1
7)MI-7
8)NJ-3
9)NM-2
10)OH-1
11)OH-15
12)VA-2
13)VA-5

Democrats loose about 10 seats.

Only 10?? You're insane.
Logged
Scott Inman (D) OK Gov 2018
BushOklahoma
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24,930
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: December 14, 2009, 08:10:34 pm »

I'm thinking somewhere in the neighborhood of 30 seats, give or take 5.
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32,869
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: December 25, 2009, 09:30:27 pm »

Could be a lot higher: Democrats have won a bunch of seats in 2006 and 2008 that they really just have no business holding based on the PVI.

I think that this is really the key.

There are several factors. 

First, the only time, post war that the president's party gained seats in an off year election was when the president had high poll numbers and it was the first year after a redistricting (2002).  The most minor losses occurred when the president had higher numbers.  My guess would be that even if Obama were at 50% to 55%, you'd see a 10-15 seat loss. 

Second, there are a number of naturally GOP seats, that might include another 5-15 seats.

Two other factor will be if Obama is below 50% and if there is a strong anti-incumbency feeling by the election. 

Naturally, I'd say 25-35 seats could be expected, though not significant.  I'd say anything above 35, and you are entering re-alignment range.  The GOP doing better than 1994 is not out of the question.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13,987
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: December 25, 2009, 09:45:27 pm »

I'd say 18 to 22. They will probably pick up around 5 and lose around 25, thus for a net loss of about 20.
Logged
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22,291
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: December 26, 2009, 02:06:18 pm »

Naturally, I'd say 25-35 seats could be expected, though not significant.  I'd say anything above 35, and you are entering re-alignment range.  The GOP doing better than 1994 is not out of the question.

Just as the Bradley Effect costing Obama the election was not out of the question.
Logged
Vepres
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,033
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: December 26, 2009, 02:10:53 pm »

Naturally, I'd say 25-35 seats could be expected, though not significant.  I'd say anything above 35, and you are entering re-alignment range.  The GOP doing better than 1994 is not out of the question.

Just as the Bradley Effect costing Obama the election was not out of the question.

Well it wasn't. If you're attempting sarcasm, I'm failing to detect it Tongue

My general feeling is we're in a period (probably since 2006) where the controlling party, whichever one it is, will suffer huge losses after huge but short-lived gains in power.
Logged
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22,291
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: December 26, 2009, 02:22:43 pm »

Naturally, I'd say 25-35 seats could be expected, though not significant.  I'd say anything above 35, and you are entering re-alignment range.  The GOP doing better than 1994 is not out of the question.

Just as the Bradley Effect costing Obama the election was not out of the question.

Well it wasn't. If you're attempting sarcasm, I'm failing to detect it Tongue

My general feeling is we're in a period (probably since 2006) where the controlling party, whichever one it is, will suffer huge losses after huge but short-lived gains in power.

I'm just mocking J.J.'s analysis, that's it.
Logged
Vepres
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8,033
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: December 26, 2009, 03:55:44 pm »

Naturally, I'd say 25-35 seats could be expected, though not significant.  I'd say anything above 35, and you are entering re-alignment range.  The GOP doing better than 1994 is not out of the question.

Just as the Bradley Effect costing Obama the election was not out of the question.

Well it wasn't. If you're attempting sarcasm, I'm failing to detect it Tongue

My general feeling is we're in a period (probably since 2006) where the controlling party, whichever one it is, will suffer huge losses after huge but short-lived gains in power.

I'm just mocking J.J.'s analysis, that's it.


Ah, ok.
Logged
Mr.Phips
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,837


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: December 27, 2009, 02:59:27 am »
« Edited: December 27, 2009, 03:15:33 am by Mr.Phips »

Naturally, I'd say 25-35 seats could be expected, though not significant.  I'd say anything above 35, and you are entering re-alignment range.  The GOP doing better than 1994 is not out of the question.

Just as the Bradley Effect costing Obama the election was not out of the question.

Well it wasn't. If you're attempting sarcasm, I'm failing to detect it Tongue

My general feeling is we're in a period (probably since 2006) where the controlling party, whichever one it is, will suffer huge losses after huge but short-lived gains in power.

So you would expect that Republicans lose big again in 2012?  Especially considering that Democrats likely wont work with Republicans the way they did on a good number of issues in 1995 and 1996, which made Republicans look somewhat competent.  This time, you will likely see Democrats blocking almost every Republican initiative. 
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: December 27, 2009, 03:45:50 am »

This time, you will likely see Democrats blocking almost every Republican initiative. 

lol
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC