Regional Self-Determination Amendment [At Final Vote] (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:20:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Regional Self-Determination Amendment [At Final Vote] (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Regional Self-Determination Amendment [At Final Vote]  (Read 18102 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: December 03, 2009, 02:51:32 PM »

If some senators were elected without any competition and 100% of the votes, well, this proposal may have a sense... But, today, that's not the case, thanks Dave.

The Pacific senator is correcting you by saying you than he was elected with 100% of votes without any competition. Well, I had a opponent, but he failed to came voting.

Yeah, perhaps BBF might like to do his research before speaking.


Perhaps the respectable President Pro Tempore might like to read each word of my sentence before posting.
"some senators" / "one senator": see the difference ?


BTW, the Pacific may really be the point of this proposal...

You claim to be objective and ideologically unbiased. Now, it's time to prove it by supporting an intelligent measure that just gives the regions the right to chose the way to elect their Senator. If you really care about facts and not about your party's interests, you must support it.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2009, 06:24:04 AM »

I do. This is obviously a conspiracy to deny regions there representation.

How pathetic, and how expected...
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2009, 05:46:03 PM »

I still urge all senators to vote against this bill unless something is clearly stated that each region must still retain one senator.  Under what Xahar has proposed, the regions may still combine

Isn't that their right?
For reasons I have outlined no less than 10 times, no

So you oppose regional rights.

OK.

Don't worry, we don't need the agreement of the non-Senator to make it pass. Wink
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2009, 05:49:06 PM »

I still urge all senators to vote against this bill unless something is clearly stated that each region must still retain one senator.  Under what Xahar has proposed, the regions may still combine

Isn't that their right?
For reasons I have outlined no less than 10 times, no

So you oppose regional rights.

OK.

Don't worry, we don't need the agreement of the non-Senator to make it pass. Wink

DWTL's support is worth than more 1 vote.

It actually worths 0 currently.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2009, 05:52:16 PM »

I still urge all senators to vote against this bill unless something is clearly stated that each region must still retain one senator.  Under what Xahar has proposed, the regions may still combine

Isn't that their right?
For reasons I have outlined no less than 10 times, no

So you oppose regional rights.

OK.

Don't worry, we don't need the agreement of the non-Senator to make it pass. Wink

DWTL's support is worth than more 1 vote.

It actually worths 0 currently.

No, it's worth about 10-15.

LOL There are 10 Senators, if you didn't know...
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2009, 06:13:29 PM »

I would think Hamilton is referring to the ratification process where the RPP universally opposes this amendment making it very unlikely to pass

Then your hypocrisy, your lies, can be exposed for all to see.
There is no hypocrisy no lies at all, the supporters of this bill have just put their fingers in their ears and refused to acknowledge what we say and instead just shout that we hate regions and think everything is a conspiracy.  There is no conspiracy, its pretty easy to see what this is aimed at doing

The fact you oppose a bill doesn't mean anyone in the RPP is dumb as you. I remember the number of people saying "this man does not speak for me" last time.
Of course, it still remains zombies. But could you keep criticizing Hamilton if you start acting the same way ?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2009, 01:48:28 PM »

One question from the gallery:

Does the proposal as currently written allow a single region to vote to terminate a voting partnership they previously entered?

Obviously, since regions are free to decide.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.