MO: PPP: Democrats Actually Lead a 2010 Race
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 01:12:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO: PPP: Democrats Actually Lead a 2010 Race
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO: PPP: Democrats Actually Lead a 2010 Race  (Read 2019 times)
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 18, 2009, 01:39:46 PM »

    US SENATE – MISSOURI (PPP)
    Robin Carnahan (D) 43%
    Roy Blunt (R) 42%

    Robin Carnahan (D) 42%
    Chuck Purgason (R) 35%

    US SENATE – MISSOURI – GOP PRIMARY (PPP)
    Roy Blunt 53%
    Chuck Purgason 16%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_MO_1118.pdf
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2009, 03:11:36 PM »

I'm actually content with these numbers for now. It will get Democrats to shut up that Missouri will be an easy pick-up for them.
Blunt wins this. I'm calling it now.
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2009, 03:12:41 PM »

This right now is the Democratic only hope for a pick-up in 2010, as of right now.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,936


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2009, 03:54:20 PM »

This right now is the Democratic only hope for a pick-up in 2010, as of right now.

Er... no?
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2009, 04:02:35 PM »

This right now is the Democratic only hope for a pick-up in 2010, as of right now.
They still have a shot in New Hampshire and Ohio, though I think their chances there are fading by the day.
Logged
pogo stick
JewishConservative
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,429
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2009, 04:13:10 PM »

I'm actually content with these numbers for now. It will get Democrats to shut up that Missouri will be an easy pick-up for them.
Blunt wins this. I'm calling it now.

Blunt will crash and burn in the primary.

Draft Sara Steelman for Senator!
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2009, 06:34:45 PM »

This absolutely won't be an easy pickup for the Dems.  Actually, this shouldn't even be considered as a lead.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2009, 05:54:26 AM »

I'm actually content with these numbers for now. It will get Democrats to shut up that Missouri will be an easy pick-up for them.
Blunt wins this. I'm calling it now.

Yeah... I'm going to suggest not calling close races a year in advance.
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2009, 03:50:18 PM »

This right now is the Democratic only hope for a pick-up in 2010, as of right now.
They still have a shot in New Hampshire and Ohio, though I think their chances there are fading by the day.

Ohio yes. In New Hampshire, Ayotte is running an invisible campaign from which she surfaces every few weeks to make a gaffe, and is likely to limp through the primary with around 44% of the vote. The NH GOP is bankrupt and badly split. That said, given her competition, she still has a decent shot.
Logged
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,500
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2009, 09:15:52 PM »


lol
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2009, 11:00:23 PM »

I agree with Dan, for a change, in general, on this one. 

Blunt is a stronger candidate for Missouri than most give him credit for (I believe he's stronger than the oft-praised Talent, for example, who I've often thought runs weaker than average for a Republican in MO).  And he'll almost undoubtedly be facing a much more favorable electorate.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 02, 2009, 01:04:16 AM »

It's still a long way off - but it'll be one of the races to definitely watch.
Logged
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,500
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 02, 2009, 03:13:31 AM »
« Edited: December 02, 2009, 03:32:58 AM by Ogre Mage »

It has not become conventional wisdom among Dems that MO is an "easy" pickup.  The most I have heard is that Carnahan is slightly to modestly favored.  Per the 2010 Senate Predictions Page, only 2 out of 93 people have ranked the race as "Strong D."  It looks like mthforu94 is setting up a strawman.

Blunt may have assets, but he has baggage as well.  To call the race for him a year before the election, in a swing state, against a candidate as strong as Carnahan, is foolish.
Logged
nkpatel1279
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,714
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2009, 01:22:04 PM »

Looking at the Missouri US Senate Races.
The most popular Republican US Senator was John Danforth- who was percieved as a moderate. Danforth was elected in 1976- open seat vacated by Democrat- Stuart Symington. the original Democratic nominee Jerry Litton was killed in a plane crash- Danforth won by a 57-42 percent margin. In 1982- He narrowly won re-election against Lt Governor Harriet Woods. In 1988- Danforth beat now Governor Jay Nixon by a 68-32 percent margin.  Danforth retired in 1994.   The Republican Nominee in 1994 MO US Senate Race was John Aschcroft- who was a former two term Governor- He defeated Alan Wheat a Black US Congressman from Kansas City by a 60-36 percent margin. Aschcroft became a Santorum like US Senator. Ashcrot was in a tough re-election campaign against then Democratic Governor Mel Carnahan. Carnahan was killed in a plane crash before he posthumously defeated Aschcroft in 2000. Carnahan's widow Jean- was appointed to the Seat but narrowly lost in the 2002 special election to Jim Talent- who was a former Congressman from the St Louis area and the GOP nominee for Governor in 2000. Talent narrowly lost re-election in 2006 to Claire McCaskill.
Robin is a much stronger candidate than her mother was in 2002 and her father was in 2000 against John Aschcroft.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 14 queries.