Republican Primary - Keystone Phil versus Alexander Hamilton (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 05:23:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community
  Forum Community Election Match-ups (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Republican Primary - Keystone Phil versus Alexander Hamilton (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well who would you vote for and who would win?
#1
Keystone Phil/Keystone Phil
 
#2
Keystone Phil/Alexander Hamilton
 
#3
Alexander Hamilton/Keystone Phil
 
#4
Alexander Hamilton/Alexander Hamilton
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 25

Author Topic: Republican Primary - Keystone Phil versus Alexander Hamilton  (Read 5039 times)
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


« on: December 23, 2009, 05:07:46 PM »


Like Deeds?
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2009, 05:24:29 PM »

Keystone would have an appeal to the GOP base unlike a dude, who during last months was once a progressive, a conservative, a libertarian... take your pick.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2009, 04:37:58 PM »

Yankee, the South is irrelevant to winning the primary. Ask Huckabee.

Ask McCain who won South Carolina in 2008 and become the front runner, and who lost SC in 2000 and couldn't recover his momentum.

I could win SC in an OPEN PRIMARY, dumbass.

Yes, you fit perfectly: a guy who in few months claimed to be progressive, conservative or libertarian, when only needed to win a support.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 15 queries.