Southern Republican Senator for Kerry
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 08:01:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  Southern Republican Senator for Kerry
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Southern Republican Senator for Kerry  (Read 2536 times)
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,210


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 20, 2004, 11:44:02 PM »

Marlow Cook, a US Senator from Kentucky in the 60's and 70's, has endorsed John Kerry, saying he is "frightened to death of George Bush". 

His editorial in the Louisville newspaper is here.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2004, 11:52:54 PM »

Yeah, well, he WAS a Senator, but he was NEVER conservative.

His endorsement is 100 times more meaningless than Zell Miller's-- whose isn't exactly pure gold itself.

Bush has gotten much better cross-party endorsements overall. Miller, Koch, Kelly...
Logged
raggage
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 505


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2004, 11:55:42 PM »

Keep in mind Bush has more than one prominent Republican officially on the record as not voting for him
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2004, 12:01:30 AM »

And Kerry has most of the Dem Senators acting like he doesn't exist.

Daschle pretends to be Bush's best friend.

Carson isn't a "Kerry Democrat."

Bowles and Inez won't appear with Kerry. Knowles probably has never met him. Salazar separates himself and won't appear with Kerry.

Yeah, Democrats are proud of Kerry.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2004, 12:40:38 AM »

Keep in mind Bush has more than one prominent Republican officially on the record as not voting for him

Someone who hasn't held elective office in more than 20 years can hardly becalled "prominent."
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2004, 03:32:33 AM »

And Kerry has most of the Dem Senators acting like he doesn't exist.

Daschle pretends to be Bush's best friend.

Carson isn't a "Kerry Democrat."

Bowles and Inez won't appear with Kerry. Knowles probably has never met him. Salazar separates himself and won't appear with Kerry.

Yeah, Democrats are proud of Kerry.

All of the above mentioned candidates are running in states that Kerry will lose, even if he wins the election. So their failure to embrace Kerry is hardly surprising, and is not a relfection of Kerry's national popularity. There aren't really any competitive Senate races in strongly Democratic states, but if there were, I doubt the Republican candidates would talk about Bush a lot. Senate candidates do what they have to do to win, and only go on the basis of the mood of their states.

The fact that Kerry is unpopular in Oklahoma is of little relevance.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2004, 03:53:52 AM »

And Kerry has most of the Dem Senators acting like he doesn't exist.

Daschle pretends to be Bush's best friend.

Carson isn't a "Kerry Democrat."

Bowles and Inez won't appear with Kerry. Knowles probably has never met him. Salazar separates himself and won't appear with Kerry.

Yeah, Democrats are proud of Kerry.

All of the above mentioned candidates are running in states that Kerry will lose, even if he wins the election. So their failure to embrace Kerry is hardly surprising, and is not a relfection of Kerry's national popularity. There aren't really any competitive Senate races in strongly Democratic states, but if there were, I doubt the Republican candidates would talk about Bush a lot. Senate candidates do what they have to do to win, and only go on the basis of the mood of their states.

The fact that Kerry is unpopular in Oklahoma is of little relevance.
"little" relevance doesn't even begin to describe it.
Might there be a reason no Republican challenger in Dem states is competitive?...
Logged
raggage
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 505


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2004, 04:30:42 AM »

Keep in mind Bush has more than one prominent Republican officially on the record as not voting for him

Someone who hasn't held elective office in more than 20 years can hardly becalled "prominent."

Lincoln Chafee is a sitting senator from Rhode Island
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2004, 05:16:53 AM »

But Chafee hasn't endorsed Kerry. Miller's endorsed Bush.

Cook can't have been a very good Senator if he only spent one term there.

He got defeated in 1974 by a Democrat who held the seat until 1998, when the GOP took the open seat.  Jim Bunning's up for re-election this year.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,037
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2004, 11:02:30 AM »

Yeah, well, he WAS a Senator, but he was NEVER conservative.

His endorsement is 100 times more meaningless than Zell Miller's-- whose isn't exactly pure gold itself.

Bush has gotten much better cross-party endorsements overall. Miller, Koch, Kelly...

why is a guy who NEVER votes with the party important at all? If you want to tout a cross part endorsement it'd be smart to go with that old senile moronic piece of crap Ed Koch, not the guy who loathed by Democrats even prior to his endorsement.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 21, 2004, 11:39:08 AM »

Hey, it was a Democrat that started this idiotic thread. I just continued in its path to continuously greater stupidity.

OF COURSE these endorsements are mostly meaningless, most spectacularly the one that is the subject of the initial post.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,210


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2004, 02:20:37 PM »


I don't see what's "idiotic" about posting the article.  It's not like I said it would sway anyone's vote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.241 seconds with 14 queries.