PPP Poll Choice This Week
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 05:57:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  PPP Poll Choice This Week
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: PPP Poll Choice This Week  (Read 5269 times)
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 02, 2010, 11:03:52 AM »

Can you please go here and vote for Massachusetts?

http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2010, 11:11:05 AM »

I voted for Massachusetts already, since it's probably the only non-Suffolk U poll we'll get.

However, Alabama seems to be winning now. I don't know why, it's not like it will end up being competitive.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2010, 11:20:52 AM »

However, Alabama seems to be winning now. I don't know why, it's not like it will end up being competitive.

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I would think that someone wants to make sure that there is no public polling of the MA Senate race, and hence are rigging the poll. Like I doubt that many people actually care about Alabama.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2010, 11:23:26 AM »

Voted for Massachusetts.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2010, 11:38:50 AM »

Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,921
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2010, 12:05:06 PM »

I voted for Massachusetts already, since it's probably the only non-Suffolk U poll we'll get.

However, Alabama seems to be winning now. I don't know why, it's not like it will end up being competitive.

Neither will Massachusetts.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2010, 12:07:56 PM »

I voted for Massachusetts already, since it's probably the only non-Suffolk U poll we'll get.

However, Alabama seems to be winning now. I don't know why, it's not like it will end up being competitive.

Neither will Massachusetts.

Perhaps not, but there's plenty of opportunity this year to poll Alabama, while the Massachusetts election is in just over two weeks.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2010, 12:39:35 PM »

Seems like they are tied now.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 02, 2010, 12:46:36 PM »

However, Alabama seems to be winning now. I don't know why, it's not like it will end up being competitive.

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I would think that someone wants to make sure that there is no public polling of the MA Senate race, and hence are rigging the poll. Like I doubt that many people actually care about Alabama.

Out of all states, why should the Democrats try to rig an election in Massachusetts ?
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 02, 2010, 01:30:56 PM »

However, Alabama seems to be winning now. I don't know why, it's not like it will end up being competitive.

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I would think that someone wants to make sure that there is no public polling of the MA Senate race, and hence are rigging the poll. Like I doubt that many people actually care about Alabama.

Out of all states, why should the Democrats try to rig an election in Massachusetts ?

That would really would be the death of the party if they had to stoop that low.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 02, 2010, 01:44:44 PM »

However, Alabama seems to be winning now. I don't know why, it's not like it will end up being competitive.

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I would think that someone wants to make sure that there is no public polling of the MA Senate race, and hence are rigging the poll. Like I doubt that many people actually care about Alabama.

Out of all states, why should the Democrats try to rig an election in Massachusetts ?

I didn't say rig the election, I said rig the poll. They don't want any public polling because they don't want people to see how close it is. That's what I would say if I was a conspiracy theorist, which I'm not. I just find it a little suspicious that Alabama has so many votes.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 02, 2010, 01:55:11 PM »

However, Alabama seems to be winning now. I don't know why, it's not like it will end up being competitive.

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I would think that someone wants to make sure that there is no public polling of the MA Senate race, and hence are rigging the poll. Like I doubt that many people actually care about Alabama.

Out of all states, why should the Democrats try to rig an election in Massachusetts ?

I didn't say rig the election, I said rig the poll. They don't want any public polling because they don't want people to see how close it is. That's what I would say if I was a conspiracy theorist, which I'm not. I just find it a little suspicious that Alabama has so many votes.

There are 2 Suffolk polls out and they have Coakley ahead by 2:1 against Brown.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2010, 01:56:21 PM »

Speaking of rigging the poll:

In the last half hour, about 100 votes were added and Connecticut went from 15% to 23%.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2010, 02:01:38 PM »

LOL: Another 8 votes added - all for Connecticut.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 02, 2010, 02:05:56 PM »
« Edited: January 04, 2010, 10:44:42 AM by Dave Leip »

In the last 5 minutes, someone has voted 20-times for CT and nobody for MA and AL.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 02, 2010, 02:08:06 PM »

However, Alabama seems to be winning now. I don't know why, it's not like it will end up being competitive.

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I would think that someone wants to make sure that there is no public polling of the MA Senate race, and hence are rigging the poll. Like I doubt that many people actually care about Alabama.

Out of all states, why should the Democrats try to rig an election in Massachusetts ?

I didn't say rig the election, I said rig the poll. They don't want any public polling because they don't want people to see how close it is. That's what I would say if I was a conspiracy theorist, which I'm not. I just find it a little suspicious that Alabama has so many votes.

There are 2 Suffolk polls out and they have Coakley ahead by 2:1 against Brown.

Those were in September before the Dem Primary even. Also they were registered voters, not likely voters which is important in a special election.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 02, 2010, 02:08:43 PM »
« Edited: January 02, 2010, 02:10:26 PM by RowanBrandon »

Yeah, it looks like the Connecticut people have gotten a hold of the poll now. I think they have at least 200 votes today.

Oh well, I'd much rather see a Connecticut poll than an Alabama poll anyway.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 02, 2010, 02:12:03 PM »

Yeah, it looks like the Connecticut people have gotten a hold of the poll now. I think they have at least 200 votes today.

Oh well, I'd much rather see a Connecticut poll than an Alabama poll anyway.

No thx, there`s Quinnipiac that`s doing CT.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 02, 2010, 02:28:42 PM »

I hope the computer of this deluded CT hacker explodes in the next 10 minutes.

Long live MA and AL !

RIP ...
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 02, 2010, 02:46:30 PM »

And CT has finally taken the lead, and along with it our freedom!
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 02, 2010, 03:02:36 PM »

Connecticut is fine only if it shows Blumenthal blowing the doors off of Simmons and spurs Dodd to retire.
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,091


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 02, 2010, 03:20:36 PM »

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! CONNECTICUT FINALLY GETS SOME REPREZINTATION
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 02, 2010, 03:58:47 PM »

And CT has finally taken the lead, and along with it our freedom!

Polling CT would be fine, but not in the current situation. We need a poll from Massachusetts already! The ones from September and October are way off now probably, and if it is a close race, the public has the right to know how close it is. PPP should poll Massachusetts instead.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 02, 2010, 04:00:13 PM »

I love how all the Republicans keep thinking Massachusetts might be close.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: January 02, 2010, 04:23:53 PM »
« Edited: January 02, 2010, 04:38:53 PM by redcommander »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California's_10th_congressional_district_special_election,_2009

Perfect example of Dems thinking Garamendi would win in a landslide and didn't.

Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 13 queries.