Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 19, 2019, 10:23:54 am
News: 2019 Gubernatorial Endorsements Close today at noon

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  Redcommander's 2010 Election Senate Results Timeline
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Print
Author Topic: Redcommander's 2010 Election Senate Results Timeline  (Read 29603 times)
A-Bob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,774
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: January 03, 2010, 01:28:37 pm »


 can project that the winner in Colorado is Frmr. Lt. Governor Jane Norton.
 

Boo
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,817
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: January 03, 2010, 03:37:06 pm »

10:15
Kirsten Powers
Image Link
Fox News can project that Incumbent Senator Bob Bennett has been reelected in Utah.

10:35

Reid defeated in NevadaImage Link
It is now projected that Harry Reid has been defeated in the state of Nevada by Republican Danny Tarkanian. With 48% of the vote in, Tarkanian is leading 55-39.
Logged
Vosem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,972
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: January 03, 2010, 04:01:53 pm »


 can project that the winner in Colorado is Frmr. Lt. Governor Jane Norton.
 

Yay!
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,817
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: January 03, 2010, 05:11:25 pm »
« Edited: January 03, 2010, 05:19:44 pm by redcommander »

11:00
Brett Baer
Welcome Back to Fox News, Polls have just closed in California, Oregon, and Washington.



Logged
Edu
Ufokart
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,278
Argentina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: January 03, 2010, 05:55:29 pm »

So, according to this the republicans take back the senate? Or is my math wrong?
Logged
Nixon was framed by the Deep State's Deep Throat
jdb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18,668
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: January 03, 2010, 06:29:42 pm »

Redcommander, please go flaunt your stupidity/hackary elsewhere, thanks!
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13,447
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: January 03, 2010, 08:36:54 pm »

Liz Feld looks like she's a mess.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,173


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: January 03, 2010, 08:45:15 pm »

roflmao
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 43,961
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: January 03, 2010, 09:21:05 pm »

Okay, well its a revolutionary concept, the content however is imperfect.

For one, I highly doubt Schiff will win the CT GOP primary. If he does, Dodd will survive.

There is no way Burr or Blunt is losing in a landslide of this proportions. Whatever there issues are, they would be carried to victory on the slant of the year alone.

New York's class I seat is not going to be lost to anyone except maybe either Rudy or Pataki and definately not to some mayor from some small town. If the Mayor of Yonkers couldn't get 35% against Hillary Clinton, a smaller town mayor isn't getting over that either.

Next, there has been no primary polling in Nevada, that I have seen so far and my guess would be that Sue Lowden would have a slight advantage over Tarkanian but since that is in the air I won't criticize your call on that.

Lastly the polling we do have in Kansas says that Jerry Moran is leading Tiarht narrowly with most of NE Kansas undecided and they will decide the winner. Moran leads the Western part of the state and Tiarht in the SE portion. I think Moran would have the edge in NE Kansas but in such an instance I think for credibility purposes alone, you should go with the current polling data.

Finally some of your margins are bit out of left field.


Other then those issues, its great and again a revolutionary concept. Smiley
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,238
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: January 03, 2010, 10:03:27 pm »

this is not a revolutionary concept
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,353
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: January 03, 2010, 10:07:24 pm »


Actually, it is.  We've never had a timeline done like this, for Congressional elections before.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,647
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: January 03, 2010, 11:34:00 pm »


Actually, it is.  We've never had a timeline done like this, for Congressional elections before.
We've had people do this sort of thing for congressional elections in their own timelines. Yawn.
Logged
Barnes
Roy Barnes 2010
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6,560


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: January 03, 2010, 11:46:17 pm »

I just look at this scenario, and I laugh, and laugh, and laugh. 

No offense to you, redcommander, really, I'm not trying to be a mean person. Smiley
Logged
Lunar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,417
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: January 04, 2010, 03:34:30 am »

If Brown wins the special, he still has to win reelection in November, right?
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14,173


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: January 04, 2010, 04:00:51 am »

If Brown wins the special, he still has to win reelection in November, right?

I don't think so. The seat isn't scheduled to be up regularly until 2012.
Logged
Lunar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,417
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: January 04, 2010, 04:02:17 am »

If Brown wins the special, he still has to win reelection in November, right?

I don't think so. The seat isn't scheduled to be up regularly until 2012.

Ah yes maybe I'm just confusing this process with how recently appointed Senators all have to run in 2010.  So Gillibrand has to run in 2010 and 2012 I believe.

lol at Brown winning though
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39,117
Bangladesh


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: January 04, 2010, 05:39:03 am »

Purple heart

Keep chugging, man.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,817
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: January 04, 2010, 06:59:21 pm »

11:05

Brett Baer

Image Link

Fox News has now received enough polling results to declare that Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon will be elected to a second term in senate. Wyden has not faced a strong challenge since he was first elected in a 1996 special election and faced Gordon Smith. He should if polling is correct win with over 60% of the vote.

Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,817
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: January 04, 2010, 07:02:19 pm »

Okay, well its a revolutionary concept, the content however is imperfect.

For one, I highly doubt Schiff will win the CT GOP primary. If he does, Dodd will survive.

There is no way Burr or Blunt is losing in a landslide of this proportions. Whatever there issues are, they would be carried to victory on the slant of the year alone.

New York's class I seat is not going to be lost to anyone except maybe either Rudy or Pataki and definately not to some mayor from some small town. If the Mayor of Yonkers couldn't get 35% against Hillary Clinton, a smaller town mayor isn't getting over that either.

Next, there has been no primary polling in Nevada, that I have seen so far and my guess would be that Sue Lowden would have a slight advantage over Tarkanian but since that is in the air I won't criticize your call on that.

Lastly the polling we do have in Kansas says that Jerry Moran is leading Tiarht narrowly with most of NE Kansas undecided and they will decide the winner. Moran leads the Western part of the state and Tiarht in the SE portion. I think Moran would have the edge in NE Kansas but in such an instance I think for credibility purposes alone, you should go with the current polling data.

Finally some of your margins are bit out of left field.


Other then those issues, its great and again a revolutionary concept. Smiley

Well I wouldn't say it's impossible for Gillibrand to be defeated by an unknown person like Feld. Al D'Amato came out of nowhere and won in 1980.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30,353
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: January 04, 2010, 07:13:37 pm »

Well I wouldn't say it's impossible for Gillibrand to be defeated by an unknown person like Feld. Al D'Amato came out of nowhere and won in 1980.

2010 won't be a 1980, and 2010 New York is not 1980 New York.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,817
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: January 04, 2010, 07:29:29 pm »

11:50

Murray defeated in Washington
In what has been a close race tonight for Patty Murray, Fox News can now estimate that she has been defeated by King County Sheriff Sue Rahr. This is the tenth pickup for Republicans tonight. Rahr is leading with 51% of the vote in, 50-47. Currently the Senate composition is 50 Democrats, 48 Republicans, and 2 Independents. Now if Republicans can pick up the Senate seat in California, where results have indicated the race as too close to call at the moment, and the open seat in Hawaii, then they will have regained control of the United States Senate narrowly. However they would still run into problems with control if a tied vote were to occur as the 2 independents caucus with the democrats.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,817
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: January 04, 2010, 07:31:02 pm »

Well I wouldn't say it's impossible for Gillibrand to be defeated by an unknown person like Feld. Al D'Amato came out of nowhere and won in 1980.

2010 won't be a 1980, and 2010 New York is not 1980 New York.

It is in this scenario.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,817
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: January 04, 2010, 07:36:10 pm »

12:00

Kirsten Powers

Hello, and welcome back to Fox News, currently polls have just closed in the last Two Senatorial Contests of the evening in Hawaii and Alaska. The race in California remains too close between Republican Steve Poizner and Democrat Barbara Boxer.

12:03

Image Link
At this time Fox News is confident enough to project Incumbent Republican Lisa Murkowski as the winner in Alaska. Murkowski is leading her democrat opponent 55-41%.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,817
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: January 04, 2010, 07:42:14 pm »

12:24

Brett Baer


Barbara Boxer Defeated
Image Link

It can be projected that in California, Republican Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner has defeated Democrat Barbara Boxer. Poizner as some of our viewers may remember ran originally for Governor, but was convinced to switch over to the Senate race upon sagging poll numbers in the Primary Race. Poizner leads Boxer with 78% of the vote in, 51-45.
Logged
CPT MikeyMike
mikeymike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,515
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.58, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: January 04, 2010, 07:50:20 pm »

I would love to see Boxer go down in flames but it's not going to happen.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC