MA Senate Special Election Poll (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 02:05:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MA Senate Special Election Poll (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would you vote for in the Massachusetts US Senate Special Election ?
#1
Martha Coakley (D)
 
#2
Martha Coakley (R)
 
#3
Martha Coakley (L/I/G/O)
 
#4
Scott Brown (R)
 
#5
Scott Brown (D)
 
#6
Scott Brown (L/I/G/O)
 
#7
Joseph Kennedy (L/I/G/O)
 
#8
Joseph Kennedy (R)
 
#9
Joseph Kennedy (D)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 69

Author Topic: MA Senate Special Election Poll  (Read 9303 times)
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« on: January 10, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »

If it looks like an actually winnable race come election day, Brown.

Otherwise, Kennedy.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2010, 10:13:44 PM »

What they are running on is, "stop the Democrats" and I simply find that to be absurd. The Republicans aren't running on anything at all, they have no ideas of their own, no solutions whatsoever, but people will happily line up in support of someone who, Hoffman from New York as one of my previous examples, doesn't care about policymaking or any of that complicated "work" stuff.
Better nothing at all than something horrible, which is what the Democrats are running on.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2010, 03:19:44 PM »

Yankee, you may have worked constructively on healthcare as a senator, but I tend to doubt that the GOP ever intended to cooperate in any way on healthcare.

Not that I demand that, that's perfectly fine as they're a pathetic minority, which shouldn't have any influence on the legislative process anyway.

Only thing is the Democratic caucus needs to hold its votes together.

Like you'd say that if Republicans were in power Roll Eyes

I would indeed. That's the point of democracy.


The U.S. is not a democracy, sorry.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2010, 03:23:52 PM »

Yankee, you may have worked constructively on healthcare as a senator, but I tend to doubt that the GOP ever intended to cooperate in any way on healthcare.

Not that I demand that, that's perfectly fine as they're a pathetic minority, which shouldn't have any influence on the legislative process anyway.

Only thing is the Democratic caucus needs to hold its votes together.

Like you'd say that if Republicans were in power Roll Eyes

I would indeed. That's the point of democracy.


The U.S. is not a democracy, sorry.

Indeed; his argument would have held even more water if he had said that the US is a republic. If you're going to attack him for not making his argument strong enough, be my guest, but you look like an idiot.

Your post doesn't even make sense. I think you should look in the mirror.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2010, 03:25:13 PM »

Yankee, you may have worked constructively on healthcare as a senator, but I tend to doubt that the GOP ever intended to cooperate in any way on healthcare.

Not that I demand that, that's perfectly fine as they're a pathetic minority, which shouldn't have any influence on the legislative process anyway.

Only thing is the Democratic caucus needs to hold its votes together.

Like you'd say that if Republicans were in power Roll Eyes

I would indeed. That's the point of democracy.


The U.S. is not a democracy, sorry.

Look I'm not getting into this Democracy v. Republic debate again. It's pointless debating that issue with trolls such as yourself, considering that you ignore widely accepted definitions.

Oh I see, you have no argument, so you report to ad hominem attacks.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.