When Will the Chinese Ecnomy Overtak the U.S. (in total wealth, not per capita)?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:45:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  When Will the Chinese Ecnomy Overtak the U.S. (in total wealth, not per capita)?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Go.
#1
2010-2019
 
#2
2020-2029
 
#3
2030-2039
 
#4
2040-2049
 
#5
2050 and beyond
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 10

Author Topic: When Will the Chinese Ecnomy Overtak the U.S. (in total wealth, not per capita)?  (Read 1040 times)
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 23, 2010, 04:41:20 PM »

Option 2
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2010, 04:51:52 PM »

I'm assuming you mean real GDP?

Maybe 2025-2030.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2010, 05:16:29 PM »

I'm assuming you mean real GDP?

Maybe 2025-2030.

I don't think nominal or real GDP matters when it comes to comparing the sizes of different nations' economies.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2010, 05:54:03 PM »
« Edited: January 23, 2010, 10:13:10 PM by phknrocket1k »

I'm assuming you mean real GDP?

Maybe 2025-2030.

I don't think nominal or real GDP matters when it comes to comparing the sizes of different nations' economies.

Btw. You can assume average growth rates of both GDP's and just use the geometric growth rate formulas to figure this out.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2010, 06:02:21 PM »

HAH I love media hype.
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2010, 06:47:20 PM »

Hype?

Any meaningful growth of the U.S. economy during the last decade is "hype."  Creating the greatest and quickest expansion of industry, infrastructure, and technology in human history is most definitely not hype.
Logged
Torie
Moderator
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2010, 08:55:22 PM »

In August of 2045.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,303


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2010, 02:54:20 AM »

I would say within the next 10-20 years, depending on whether China can continue to grow at 10-12%.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2010, 02:59:34 AM »
« Edited: January 24, 2010, 03:14:21 AM by phknrocket1k »

I would say within the next 10-20 years, depending on whether China can continue to grow at 10-12%.

From what I gather

China is 4.33 trillion US
US is 14.20 trillion US.
This was Google's Public Data in Nominal GDP. Sad

If you want to figure out what things will be like over time.

Growing at x%:

1% implies doubling every 72 years
2% implies doubling every 36 years
3% implies doubling every 24 years.
4% implies doubling every 18 years.
5% implies doubling every 14.4 years.
6% implies doubling every 12 years.
7% implies doubling every 10.2 years.
8% implies doubling every 9 years.
9%  implies doubling every 8 years.
10% implies doubling every 7 years.
12% implies doubling every 6 years.

A 12 year, 12% growth horizon could do the trick. Especially if the US's post-2008 growth is anemic and China's is spectacular.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,303


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2010, 03:09:02 AM »

I would say within the next 10-20 years, depending on whether China can continue to grow at 10-12%.

A 12 year, 12% growth horizon could do the trick. Especially if the US's post-2008 growth is anemic and China's is spectacular.

I suspect China won't be growing at 12% if the US isn't growing. Somebody has to buy the crap they make or they will face a crisis sooner rather than later.
Logged
Torie
Moderator
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2010, 12:43:42 PM »

Assuming the current numbers, 4.33 and 14.2, China growing at a 3.5% annualized rate faster than the US, would imply China catches up to the US in 35 years or so. I don't think the faster annualized growth rate of China will exceed 3.5% over the US over such a long period of time, and it might well be more on the order of 2.5%. (if it is in the latter figure of 2.5% (say 4.5% versus the US at 2% annualized growth, than it will take about 48 years for China to catch up to the US.)

Keep in mind, that China's population growth rate during this period will probably be slower than the US, perhaps by a percent of so a year. Granted, China will get a huge boost as an ever greater percentage of its population enters the industrialized modern economy, but I don't see that boosting the growth rate much above the numbers I am using. Another drag on China will be its questionable judicial system and protection of property rights, and overall corruption. China's need to attend to environmental degradations, and climate change, and all the rest, will also slow down its overall growth rate.

Having said all of the above, Goldman Sachs projects China will be larger by 2025-2030. I suspect Goldman is making the mistake however of assuming that the growth gap between the US and China can continue to be as large as it is now, or almost as large, for a period extending to 2030, and I strongly suspect that that is a mistake. As China develops, its rate of growth will slow down, since the marginal gains will became smaller as the cheapest ways to increase the size of the economy are no longer available.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2010, 05:18:38 PM »

Assume a long run average growth rate for any country.

Plug in

Y(PRC_Future_GDP) = 4,300,000,000,000e^(PRC_Growth_Rate*Time)
Y(USA_Future_GDP) = 14,200,000,000,000e^(USA_Growth_Rate*Time)

into any graphing calculator and figure out the intersection.

Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2010, 08:03:04 PM »

Assume a long run average growth rate for any country.

It is difficult to make that kind of assumption for China.
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2010, 09:09:18 PM »

Assume a long run average growth rate for any country.

It is difficult to make that kind of assumption for China.

Indeed.  Surely China will run into diminishing marginal returns to its inputs...hard to say when, but the growth rates thrown around here can't last...can they???
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2010, 09:22:28 PM »

Assume a long run average growth rate for any country.

It is difficult to make that kind of assumption for China.

Indeed.  Surely China will run into diminishing marginal returns to its inputs...hard to say when, but the growth rates thrown around here can't last...can they???

Well just approximate an upper and lower bound.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2010, 09:27:33 PM »


Switch the 4 to a 2 and I might agree with you.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 13 queries.