What is the stupidest book you have ever read? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:37:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate
  Political Essays & Deliberation (Moderator: Torie)
  What is the stupidest book you have ever read? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What is the stupidest book you have ever read?  (Read 19667 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,721
United Kingdom


« on: February 10, 2010, 02:21:06 PM »

Hard to say. Hitler's Willing Executioners (Goldhagen) is pretty fucking stupid though (and in several different ways). I remember reading it and finding it hard to believe that it was for real. But I've almost certainly read more idiotic non-fiction books over the years... can't quite remember any at the moment, but they'll come.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,721
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2010, 01:10:30 PM »

The title is certainly a good indication that it's probably pretty stupid. You must now provide details of the idiocy of the books mentioned in first post.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,721
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2010, 09:47:43 AM »

The Da Vinci Code is up there with some of the worst.

Did you think the movie was bad as well?

Redundant question is redundant.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,721
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2010, 09:51:33 AM »

Mein Kampf (I stopped reading after one page due to the massive s**t I saw there). I don't agree with any of the s**t written there, I just wanted to see into the mind of a massive maniac.

Mein Kampf is certainly one of the worst books ever published, but I'm not sure if 'stupidest' is quite the right word. I mean, sure, it is a very stupid book on many levels, but I think the turgid insanity of it all is its main feature.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,721
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2010, 09:52:48 AM »

...according to The Sunday Times Brian Appelyard.

As a recommendation for 'idiocy' I think that that would have done on its own...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,721
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2010, 01:27:57 PM »

Yeah, Mein Kampf is really a quite interesting book if you're willing to look past the turgid prose.

As a book it isn't at all interesting (or, rather, no more interesting than a deranged rant on Stormfront). As a primary source, aha. That would be a different matter entirely.

But the writing style though. Christ. I don't think, and this is no exaggeration, that I have ever read worse.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,721
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2010, 07:28:09 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Ummm... This is wrong?

Yes. A much higher proportion of women than men chose to stay at home and a much higher proportion of women than men chose to work in part-time jobs; you could argue that the cultural factors responsible for this are examples of discrimination, but only with great difficulty and certain unfortunate implications.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,721
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2010, 03:00:20 PM »

I think the prize goes to some "Economics 101" type book actually available at Cologne uni library... badly translated from the American to boot... but I wouldn't be able to tell you the title or the author or authors.

Stupid in the predictable ways, or were there special extra horrors?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,721
United Kingdom


« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2010, 03:01:46 PM »

For idiocy at academic level, I nominate the bulk of Patrick Joyce's work. Postmodernist history is usually pretty terrible, but when it isn't even theoretically consistent...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,721
United Kingdom


« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2010, 06:54:26 AM »


He's just trying to make it clear that he really hates that book.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 14 queries.