Steve Pearce Vs. Harry Teague, a close race
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 03:15:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 House Election Polls
  Steve Pearce Vs. Harry Teague, a close race
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Steve Pearce Vs. Harry Teague, a close race  (Read 4299 times)
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 25, 2010, 01:22:11 PM »

PPP's poll has shown Pearce leading Teague 43 - 41%. The race is a pure toss up, but who do you think will win?

I think Teague will win, his approvals are high and he only has to catch hispanic and liberal vote. And in my opinion, 2010 won't be a new 1994, democrats will be in a better shape for october - november.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_NM_225.pdf
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,919


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2010, 04:16:18 PM »

Full PPP poll results for New Mexico's House seats (MoE of 5%):

    Martin Heinrich (D-inc): 45
    Jon Barela (R): 36
    Undecided: 19

    Harry Teague (D-inc): 41
    Steve Pearce (R): 43
    Undecided: 16

    Ben Lujan (D-inc): 40
    Adam Kokesh (R): 32
    Undecided: 28

    Ben Lujan (D-inc): 42
    Tom Mullins (R): 36
    Undecided: 22

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_NM_225.pdf

Lujan's weakness is surprising, but I assume that's in part to do with the fact that his strongest supporters in the district don't speak English.
Logged
ajc0918
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,903
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2010, 06:51:25 PM »

Full PPP poll results for New Mexico's House seats (MoE of 5%):

    Martin Heinrich (D-inc): 45
    Jon Barela (R): 36
    Undecided: 19

    Harry Teague (D-inc): 41
    Steve Pearce (R): 43
    Undecided: 16

    Ben Lujan (D-inc): 40
    Adam Kokesh (R): 32
    Undecided: 28

    Ben Lujan (D-inc): 42
    Tom Mullins (R): 36
    Undecided: 22

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_NM_225.pdf

Lujan's weakness is surprising, but I assume that's in part to do with the fact that his strongest supporters in the district don't speak English.

Barela looks good too, he can still win, but it will obviously be hard.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2010, 07:23:00 PM »

Looks like Kokesh isn't such a longshot after all. Cheesy
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2010, 07:54:13 PM »

An incumbent below 50, is vulnerable, an incumbent below his opponent is in deep sh**t. The district vote for McCain narrowly and 2010 will be a better year then 2008, a year in which our candidate was horrible. I think we will regain this seat.
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2010, 08:27:05 AM »

An incumbent below 50, is vulnerable, an incumbent below his opponent is in deep sh**t. The district vote for McCain narrowly and 2010 will be a better year then 2008, a year in which our candidate was horrible. I think we will regain this seat.

Exactly!
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2010, 08:51:32 AM »

Looks like Kokesh isn't such a longshot after all. Cheesy

His favorables are 4/17.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2010, 11:49:02 AM »

Teague is popular even with that republican wave. If October is a better month for Ds than February, Teague will win.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2010, 08:10:11 PM »

An incumbent below 50, is vulnerable, an incumbent below his opponent is in deep sh**t. The district vote for McCain narrowly and 2010 will be a better year then 2008, a year in which our candidate was horrible. I think we will regain this seat.

Many people probably still think Pearce is the incumbent.  If he was so strong, he would be leading by 10+ points like Chabot in OH-01. 
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 28, 2010, 08:26:30 PM »

An incumbent below 50, is vulnerable, an incumbent below his opponent is in deep sh**t. The district vote for McCain narrowly and 2010 will be a better year then 2008, a year in which our candidate was horrible. I think we will regain this seat.

Many people probably still think Pearce is the incumbent.  If he was so strong, he would be leading by 10+ points like Chabot in OH-01. 

Not necessarily. Yes that may exist in some areas but I don't think that is driver force behind Chabot's numbers in OH-01.
Logged
The Age Wave
silent_spade07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 944
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 28, 2010, 10:32:58 PM »

I definitely give Pearce the edge on this one. He's an ugly dude, though.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 15, 2010, 04:22:33 PM »
« Edited: April 15, 2010, 04:27:44 PM by King »

Pearce has the edge because Pearce has Oil & Gas on his side while Harry Teague has Dairy.  That's basically how NM South works.  Dairy gets 45% of vote, O&G gets 55% of the vote.  Last election Teague was a rare oil man Democrat while Ed Tinsley was a joke.  His vote on the energy bill last year doomed him.

In the Lujan-Kokesh thing, it's important to keep in mind that there's a strong Hispanic and Native American rural back country that most pollsters tend to miss and who turn out in force for the Democrat.  Lujan is only leading 40-32 in Santa Fe and Farmington, but he's leading 90-10 everywhere else.   Kokesh would have to run a hell of a campaign to win and that's something Libertarians are incapable of doing.

In NM-01, the incumbent will win by 5% as all incumbents from NM-01 do until they decide to retire.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 14 queries.