Who is most responsible for Gore's loss in 2000?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:58:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Who is most responsible for Gore's loss in 2000?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Poll
Question: .
#1
Gore himself
 
#2
Monica
 
#3
Bill Clinton
 
#4
Hillary Clinton
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 135

Author Topic: Who is most responsible for Gore's loss in 2000?  (Read 27838 times)
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 10, 2010, 03:40:51 AM »

Gore himself.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2010, 02:39:35 PM »

Either Gore or Lieberman.
Logged
Conservative frontier
JC
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2010, 03:33:59 PM »

Al Gore
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2010, 08:48:44 AM »

Gore himself.
Logged
Guderian
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 575


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2010, 11:29:59 AM »
« Edited: March 11, 2010, 11:32:49 AM by Guderian »

1. Ralph Nader and his voters.

2. Electoral college system.

3.  Butterfly ballot.

4. Clinton's libido.

5. Gore himself.

...

825. Lieberman.

Idea that Gore commited an electoral suicide and pulled the defeat out of the jaws of victory is wrong, in my opinion. People often try to blame everything on the candidate, it seems like every losing candidate in last 200 years blew an election by campaigning poorly or picking the wrong running mate (which is always the most overanalyzed campaign decision that rarely makes the difference between winning and losing). As a matter of fact, Gore ran a solid campaign and managed to beat Bush by 550,000 popular votes after trailing in polls against him since mid-1999. It was a bizarre and unrepeatable set of circumstances that prevented him from becoming President, and if those circumstances haven't been in place, he'd be praised for Truman II comeback. Sure, he made some mistakes, but almost everybody does. Bush made even more of them, in my opinion.

Now I'm going to take a shower because I feel dirty after defending Al Gore.  
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2010, 07:57:02 PM »

Butterfly ballot
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2010, 08:13:04 PM »


That was designed by a Democrat.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2010, 08:21:36 PM »

Gore, without a doubt.  This should have been the map:
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2010, 08:29:11 PM »

Gore, without a doubt.  This should have been the map:


Give TN to Bush and OH+NV to Gore. That should have been the map. (I would anticipate Gore losing TN since he flip-flopped on abortion and gay rights after he left the Senate.)
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2010, 11:54:00 PM »


OK.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,680
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 17, 2010, 12:00:48 PM »

It was so close that any reason anyone names can be argued to be the reason. He should have given more attention to Arkansas and West Virginia, he should have gone for Ohio rather than Florida, he should have carried his home state, he shouldn't have sighed... or its Nader's fault, it's the fault of minor Trot parties in Florida, its the fault of the ballot design in Florida, the fault of the blacklist in Florida, the fault of the Supreme Court, the fault the electoral system, fault of the fault of the fault of the fault...

But, basically, Guderian is right. Gore did very well - a few minor mistakes and various weird events (most of which no one could have ever predicted) where what cost him the election, not major errors. Most fightbacks don't quite make it at this level; as HHH and Ford could tell you as well.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 17, 2010, 12:39:23 PM »
« Edited: March 17, 2010, 12:41:01 PM by change08 »

Gore. He to way to much for granted. Although, I still say Bill could've helped a bit more than he did.

Ralph Nader should've been an option in this poll!
Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 17, 2010, 12:55:16 PM »

The Supreme Court Wink
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 17, 2010, 12:55:34 PM »

Gore. He to way to much for granted. Although, I still say Bill could've helped a bit more than he did.

Ralph Nader should've been an option in this poll!

Gore told Bill not to help and if Gore had run a good campaign he could have made Nader irrelevant.
Logged
useful idiot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 17, 2010, 02:21:16 PM »

If you're going to say Nader, then you might as well say it was Bush. 50,456,002 people voted for him. Only 2,882,955 voted for Nader.

Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 17, 2010, 07:02:28 PM »

Gore. He to way to much for granted. Although, I still say Bill could've helped a bit more than he did.

Ralph Nader should've been an option in this poll!

Gore told Bill not to help and if Gore had run a good campaign he could have made Nader irrelevant.

I agree with this. Bush Sr. didn't need Reagan's help to win a landslide victory, so Gore shouldn't have needed Bill Clinton's help to do the same.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,680
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 17, 2010, 09:39:28 PM »

If you're going to say Nader, then you might as well say it was Bush. 50,456,002 people voted for him. Only 2,882,955 voted for Nader.

Actually if you're going to say 'Nader' you might as well say 'Clinton'... there's a reason why nearly three million voted for a fringe candidate despite the election being close...
Logged
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 18, 2010, 07:16:13 PM »

TIPPER!!!!!!
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 18, 2010, 07:17:05 PM »


Why?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 18, 2010, 08:14:51 PM »

If you're going to say Nader, then you might as well say it was Bush. 50,456,002 people voted for him. Only 2,882,955 voted for Nader.

Actually if you're going to say 'Nader' you might as well say 'Clinton'... there's a reason why nearly three million voted for a fringe candidate despite the election being close...

How do you know Clinton caused all those voters to vote for Nader?

Is his point that hard to comprehend?
Logged
justW353
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,693
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 18, 2010, 09:25:28 PM »

Ralph Nader
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,681
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 19, 2010, 12:12:54 AM »

I'm always amazed he came as close to winning as he did.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 05, 2010, 12:05:30 PM »

Let's see, he lost his home state of TN, Clinton's home state of AR, an WV which had been a locked in democratic state since the civil war.  Another mistake was OH which Gore pulled out of 6 weeks before the election because of polls showing him down by double digits and it turned out to only be by a few points.  Any of these states would've helped.  His positions on guns hurt him in all 4 of those states too.  Going into that election I had Bush winning 51-45 anyhow so I was surprised to even see it that close.
Logged
JoeyJoeJoe
Rookie
**
Posts: 230
Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 04, 2010, 12:22:55 PM »



A Democrat in name only, who used the term "Democrat Party", and later switched parties.
Logged
JoeyJoeJoe
Rookie
**
Posts: 230
Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 04, 2010, 12:23:38 PM »


Correct.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 15 queries.