Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 22, 2018, 06:43:32 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Election 2018 predictions for US Senate are now open!.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderators: Beet, Apocrypha)
| | |-+  Should zoosexuality be legal?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Print
Poll
Question: .
Yes   -33 (23.1%)
No   -110 (76.9%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 142

Author Topic: Should zoosexuality be legal?  (Read 29978 times)
kobidobidog
Rookie
*
Posts: 47
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #100 on: June 12, 2013, 12:30:56 am »

Bottom line. People are having a bloody war against a type of sex.  All of us have likes and dislikes. Live and let live,  but the motto  with people really is live but lets kill whoever we think does what we think is disgusting or jail them. That sounds demonic doesn't it?
Logged
Trounce-'em Theresa
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19,621


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #101 on: June 12, 2013, 09:52:44 am »

Bottom line. People are having a bloody war against a type of sex.  All of us have likes and dislikes. Live and let live,  but the motto  with people really is live but lets kill whoever we think does what we think is disgusting or jail them. That sounds demonic doesn't it?

What sounds demonic is screwing animals.
Logged



Professor Nathan. A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

Yeah that's right, I said Siam. Why don't you go tell Pedro Martinez
kobidobidog
Rookie
*
Posts: 47
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #102 on: July 02, 2013, 09:20:18 pm »

The law of men is designed to take freedoms away. That is why there are jails. All of it is there to give jobs. Jobs to figure out what they can arrest whoever for whatever.  That is why a form of sex is being squashed by people. The law needs to be eliminated. When it is People will be like Jesus is working out their own salivation. Until then opponents to zoo are only cooking their own goose come judgment day. Of course zoosexuality should be legal. When it is people will not have an excuse to be inhospitable, hostile threatening people like Sodomites outside lots door.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38,053
Samoa


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #103 on: July 03, 2013, 09:51:56 am »

This disgusting thread is one that just won't ever die I see. Pity that.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,646
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #104 on: July 03, 2013, 10:53:31 pm »

How is this allowed on here?
Logged

Immortal Sockhead
MustCrushCapitalism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 411
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.16, S: -9.04

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #105 on: July 04, 2013, 07:54:00 pm »

Yes. If you can obtain consent from an animal, the state has no right to say that you can't bone it.
Logged

Economic: -52 trillion
Social: -24 billion
greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,637


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #106 on: July 04, 2013, 08:22:37 pm »

Yes. If you can obtain consent from an animal, the state has no right to say that you can't bone it.

But how can you obtain consent from an animal? I mean, I guess you can give your consent for the animal to bone you, but that doesn't work in reverse because we can't communicate verbally in the same language with animals.
Logged
MustCrushCapitalism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 411
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.16, S: -9.04

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #107 on: July 04, 2013, 08:42:16 pm »

But how can you obtain consent from an animal? I mean, I guess you can give your consent for the animal to bone you, but that doesn't work in reverse because we can't communicate verbally in the same language with animals.

There are some really stingy women out there who it's difficult to obtain consent from... doesn't mean that it should be illegal, if you could. Rape is already illegal, though. Tongue
Logged

Economic: -52 trillion
Social: -24 billion
greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,637


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #108 on: July 04, 2013, 08:55:54 pm »

But how can you obtain consent from an animal? I mean, I guess you can give your consent for the animal to bone you, but that doesn't work in reverse because we can't communicate verbally in the same language with animals.

There are some really stingy women out there who it's difficult to obtain consent from... doesn't mean that it should be illegal, if you could. Rape is already illegal, though. Tongue

I think the language issue here is that people don't think an animal can consent to sex so therefore they consider bestiality/zoo-sexuality to be rape. That means that to propose legalizing the practice probably sounds like legalizing rape against animals. So you'd have to explain how animals can consent to it before people will consider the idea...
« Last Edit: July 04, 2013, 09:00:11 pm by greenforest32 »Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,137
Liechtenstein


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #109 on: July 04, 2013, 08:59:06 pm »

Yes. If you can obtain consent from an animal, the state has no right to say that you can't bone it.

But how can you obtain consent from an animal? I mean, I guess you can give your consent for the animal to bone you, but that doesn't work in reverse because we can't communicate verbally in the same language with animals.

This might make some amount of sense except that animals tend to "bone" rather violently; "dude gets [inks]ed by horse, dude admitted to hospital with internal bleeding" is a rather common news item.  So, it's sort of recklessly exposing oneself to the possibility of injury, the cost of which may have to be borne by others.
Logged
greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,637


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #110 on: July 04, 2013, 09:13:44 pm »

Yes. If you can obtain consent from an animal, the state has no right to say that you can't bone it.

But how can you obtain consent from an animal? I mean, I guess you can give your consent for the animal to bone you, but that doesn't work in reverse because we can't communicate verbally in the same language with animals.

This might make some amount of sense except that animals tend to "bone" rather violently; "dude gets [inks]ed by horse, dude admitted to hospital with internal bleeding" is a rather common news item.  So, it's sort of recklessly exposing oneself to the possibility of injury, the cost of which may have to be borne by others.

It makes some sense in the sense that you have the mental capacity to understand the situation and clearly give your consent for something like that to happen to you but my point was that the animal can't do that like humans can so therefore zoosexuality shouldn't be legal.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,646
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #111 on: July 06, 2013, 07:40:01 pm »

This thread makes me want to throw up.
Logged

Immortal Sockhead
everybodyvote
Newbie
*
Posts: 10
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #112 on: July 11, 2013, 02:05:34 am »

They're ANIMALS. Their consent is irrelevant.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,646
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #113 on: July 11, 2013, 02:41:22 am »

They're ANIMALS. Their consent is irrelevant.

So you're for it?
Logged

Immortal Sockhead
kobidobidog
Rookie
*
Posts: 47
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #114 on: October 16, 2013, 05:57:29 pm »

People against the zoo are immoral. People against the zoo are the thieves in the temple. If people say they were whipped are the people Jesus should have whipped. Luke 6:45: K J B:John 10:10: The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. Those against the zoosexual do not want to give life no not any good thing.  Jesus  did not whip anyone. People whipped him.
Logged
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27,681
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -7.48

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #115 on: October 16, 2013, 06:00:05 pm »

People against the zoo are immoral. People against the zoo are the thieves in the temple. If people say they were whipped are the people Jesus should have whipped. Luke 6:45: K J B:John 10:10: The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. Those against the zoosexual do not want to give life no not any good thing.  Jesus  did not whip anyone. People whipped him.

You're back! We've missed you.
Logged



Jimmy Garoppolo win percentage (as of Feb. 2018): 100%
freefair
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 760
United Kingdom


View Profile WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #116 on: October 16, 2013, 06:25:52 pm »

Nope. Kill animals humanely for their rescources but don't make them suffer in life.
Logged

If you're centrist to right wing do follow this link and participate in this timelime poll!!
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=186153.0
PM- Ecn +4.95 Soc -4.95
Pragmatically libertarian. Centrist by US standards, Tory in UK.
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27,681
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -7.48

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #117 on: October 16, 2013, 06:34:15 pm »

Kill [...] humanely

This is a contradiction.
Logged



Jimmy Garoppolo win percentage (as of Feb. 2018): 100%
ElectionsGuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15,556
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.87, S: -6.96

P P
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #118 on: October 17, 2013, 12:28:04 pm »

God no, animals should only practice sexuality with their own animal partners. So humans only with humans.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36,696
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #119 on: October 17, 2013, 01:15:42 pm »

God no, animals should only practice sexuality with their own animal partners.

what punishment do you advocate for animals who have sex with other species of animal?
Logged

I wanna contribute to the chaos
I don't wanna watch and then complain,
'cause I am through finding blame
that is the decision that I have made
ElectionsGuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15,556
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.87, S: -6.96

P P
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #120 on: October 17, 2013, 01:39:24 pm »

God no, animals should only practice sexuality with their own animal partners.

what punishment do you advocate for animals who have sex with other species of animal?

Does that even happen? If so, we obviously shouldn't punish animals, we should let them be independent. If animals have sex with other animals, that's wrong (INHO), but we shouldn't do anything about it. I just think that shouldn't happen, but I suppose it could lead to a first birth of another animal, so it could be positive I guess.

But we are also animals, and why would we have sex with a pig or a dog? Its not only weird, but I'm not sure it would even work in many cases. I believe its unheard of for different animals to have sex with humans, but for people forcing or having sex with other animals should be punished for disturbing their peace or life. We are a very intelligent species, and we should control our own actions, I don't think other animals should have that responsibility. That's basically the difference.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36,696
United States


View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #121 on: October 17, 2013, 01:48:55 pm »

I believe its unheard of for different animals to have sex with humans, but for people forcing or having sex with other animals should be punished for disturbing their peace or life.

aren't these way greater disruptions for the animals involved than penetration?



Logged

I wanna contribute to the chaos
I don't wanna watch and then complain,
'cause I am through finding blame
that is the decision that I have made
ElectionsGuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15,556
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.87, S: -6.96

P P
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #122 on: October 17, 2013, 02:41:00 pm »

I believe its unheard of for different animals to have sex with humans, but for people forcing or having sex with other animals should be punished for disturbing their peace or life.

aren't these way greater disruptions for the animals involved than penetration?

EVERY animal needs to eat, and almost all animals eat other animals. Yes, its a disruption that's greater than zoo sexuality, but eating food is necessary, zoo sexuality is not.
Logged
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27,681
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -7.48

View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #123 on: October 17, 2013, 03:03:11 pm »

I believe its unheard of for different animals to have sex with humans, but for people forcing or having sex with other animals should be punished for disturbing their peace or life.

aren't these way greater disruptions for the animals involved than penetration?

EVERY animal needs to eat, and almost all animals eat other animals. Yes, its a disruption that's greater than zoo sexuality, but eating food is necessary, zoo sexuality is not.

Your argument is that humans are animals, therefore it's okay to eat animals.

So if animals have sex with each other, then...
Logged



Jimmy Garoppolo win percentage (as of Feb. 2018): 100%
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18,308
United States
View Profile Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #124 on: October 17, 2013, 09:51:18 pm »

Tweed, what you posted is an argument for increasing protections for farm animals; not for legalizing bestiality.
Logged


Gabriel Cáceres

"He who feeds you, controls you." -Thomas Sankara
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines