Yes. If you can obtain consent from an animal, the state has no right to say that you can't bone it.
But how can you obtain consent from an animal? I mean, I guess you can give your consent for the animal to bone you, but that doesn't work in reverse because we can't communicate verbally in the same language with animals.
This might make some amount of sense except that animals tend to "bone" rather violently; "dude gets [inks]ed by horse, dude admitted to hospital with internal bleeding" is a rather common news item. So, it's sort of recklessly exposing oneself to the possibility of injury, the cost of which may have to be borne by others.
Poll
