Who will have already announced 1 year from today?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 07:57:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Who will have already announced 1 year from today?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who will have already announced 1 year from today?  (Read 1419 times)
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 22, 2010, 07:51:15 PM »

And who will have already announced they're not running?

I'll say because the 2012 primaries will start later than the 2008 ones, you'll see slightly more people still deciding in March 2011 than you did in 2007.

I'll say formal announcements:
Romney
Pawlenty
Thune
Johnson
Santorum
Pataki
Perry

Exploratory committees:
Palin
Gingrich
Daniels

Officially passed:
Huckabee
Giuliani
Barbour
Logged
Poundingtherock
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 917
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2010, 07:53:45 PM »

I'll say formal announcements:

Palin
Pawlenty
Thune
Johnson
Santorum

No announcements

Romney (I'll go out on a limb and predict no run)
Barbour
Gingrich
Jeb Bush

Officially passed
Huckabee
Rudy
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2010, 08:13:51 PM »

I'll say because the 2012 primaries will start later than the 2008 ones

Who says?

In all likelihood, Iowa will once again go in the first week or two of January.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2010, 08:54:35 PM »

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/11/20/huckabee-giuliani-romney-camps-weigh-in-on-2012-primary-calendar/?fbid=2afPWIPIUrn

Beth Myers, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney's 2008 campaign manager
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Former Huckabee presidential campaign manager Chip Saltsman
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
---
http://www.demconwatchblog.com/diary/2972/iowa-gets-boost-to-keep-first-primary


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It's too early to know if they'll succeed but it seems both Ds and Rs are trying to push the season back a month.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2010, 08:58:55 PM »

Formal announcements:
Gary Johnson
Mitt Romney
Sarah Palin
Tim Pawlenty
Hayley Barbour

No official statement either way:
Mitch Daniels
Newt Gingrich

Officially passed:
Mike Huckabee
Rudy Giuliani
Eric Cantor

Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2010, 09:09:04 PM »

Palin
Paul
Romney
Huckabee
Random GOP Extremist Congressman #1
Santorum
Newt

It's still be a 3-way deadlock between Romney-Palin-Huck.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2010, 09:34:28 PM »

It's too early to know if they'll succeed but it seems both Ds and Rs are trying to push the season back a month.

Yes, I'm aware of their efforts, but they're going to fail.  There are about 20 states which, according to current state law, are voting in the first week of Feb.  Good luck with trying to get them all to move.  As long as any of them are voting in early Feb., and as long as Florida is the week before, SC will go a week earlier, NH will go a week earlier than that, and IA will go a week earlier than that.  The only way to get them to move is if you penalize them by stripping away all their delegates, and the RNC has shown absolutely no interest in going that far.

Also, the start time of the primary season isn't necessarily known at the time that people are announcing their candidacies.  As of January 2007, it was still thought that Iowa might be voting in mid-January rather than early January.  In any case, in the 2008 cycle, virtually everyone had already announced their intentions by the end of January 2007.  Even if things are shifted a month later, the 2012ers should pretty much all have announced what they're doing by mid-March 2011.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2010, 10:01:10 PM »
« Edited: March 22, 2010, 10:05:21 PM by Bull Moose Base »

Okay, sounds right.  But I'd say one major potential exception is Palin because her behavior is completely erratic (always what you want in a president) and her power to attract press is strong enough to give her the option of starting later than everyone else with less damage.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2010, 10:19:21 PM »

Oh, I agree. Palin doesn't follow the same rules as everyone else, so she's going to string this out forever, no matter what her decision is.
Logged
nhmagic
azmagic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,097
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.62, S: 4.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2010, 10:45:38 PM »

Romney pretty much announced today without saying it.  - He really means "my campaign begins today".

A Campaign Begins Today   [Mitt Romney]


America has just witnessed an unconscionable abuse of power. President Obama has betrayed his oath to the nation — rather than bringing us together, ushering in a new kind of politics, and rising above raw partisanship, he has succumbed to the lowest denominator of incumbent power: justifying the means by extolling the ends. He promised better; we deserved better.

He calls his accomplishment “historic” — in this he is correct, although not for the reason he intends. Rather, it is an historic usurpation of the legislative process — he unleashed the nuclear option, enlisted not a single Republican vote in either chamber, bribed reluctant members of his own party, paid-off his union backers, scapegoated insurers, and justified his act with patently fraudulent accounting. What Barack Obama has ushered into the American political landscape is not good for our country; in the words of an ancient maxim, “what starts twisted, ends twisted.”

His health-care bill is unhealthy for America. It raises taxes, slashes the more private side of Medicare, installs price controls, and puts a new federal bureaucracy in charge of health care. It will create a new entitlement even as the ones we already have are bankrupt. For these reasons and more, the act should be repealed. That campaign begins today.

Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2010, 10:57:08 PM »

Using 60 votes to break a filibuster (the bill that has so far passed) is an abuse of presidential power?  What's funny is I never suspected Romney of at one time abusing his power as governor until he came out against it.
Logged
Poundingtherock
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 917
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 23, 2010, 12:06:39 AM »

My money is on Palin announcing the earliest (with the exception of Johnson)....meaning in January of 2011 at the latest.
Logged
Progressive
jro660
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 26, 2010, 04:45:33 PM »

My money is on Palin announcing the earliest (with the exception of Johnson)....meaning in January of 2011 at the latest.

I agree 100%, I think that Palin and Santorum are the two most eager candidates.
Logged
RosettaStoned
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,153
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.45, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 26, 2010, 06:25:54 PM »

Romney, Huckabee and Palin.
Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,545
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 26, 2010, 06:28:29 PM »

I expect Palin to be the last one to throw the hat in the ring. She'll wait it out and then stomp her way in. I think it's her best strategy.
Logged
California8429
A-Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,785
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 26, 2010, 06:40:47 PM »

I'll say formal announcements:
Romney
Pawlenty
Johnson
Santorum
Perry

Exploratory committees:
Palin
Gingrich
Daniels
Pataki
Giuliani
Barbour
Thune
GOP Congressman (Pence, King)

Officially passed:
Huckabee
McDonnell
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 26, 2010, 07:37:03 PM »

3 Palin scenarios.

1. She intends to run.  She'll announce timed to help generate publcity for her TV show and book.

2. She's decided not to and will wait as late as Fall of 2011 to say so for the reasons above.

3. She's  undecided but because of her fame can wait as late as Fall 2011 to decide.

Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 26, 2010, 08:24:59 PM »

1. She intends to run.  She'll announce timed to help generate publcity for her TV show and book.

Hmmm....I'm actually wondering if Discovery will drop her TV show if she becomes a candidate.  Might there not be thorny campaign finance issues involved in airing her show while she's running for office?
Logged
ScottM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 299


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: 4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 26, 2010, 08:36:36 PM »

Johnson (Probably the first to announce. He really has no reason to even wait until 2011.)
Pawlenty
Romney (Wants it so bad he can taste it.)
Santorum
Thune
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 26, 2010, 08:47:13 PM »

1. She intends to run.  She'll announce timed to help generate publcity for her TV show and book.

Hmmm....I'm actually wondering if Discovery will drop her TV show if she becomes a candidate.  Might there not be thorny campaign finance issues involved in airing her show while she's running for office?


No chance.  A lot or all of the show will be finished by then and many millions of dollars already paid.  Their lawyers will find them a way around the problem that doesn't involve scrapping the show. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.238 seconds with 13 queries.