VOTE

[Emsworth]

Regions don't HAVE to have governors.

It was so desired by the "initial vote."

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I offer my most sincere apologia for having offended you. Since you insist, I shall include the regions in question.

[7,052,770]

whilst it is a good idea to have at least four voters per region, you can't just exclude the rest.

I would definitely be willing to include your first proposal. But to include those with two-voter regions would be pointless, as they cannot be used. But if you insist, I shall include them.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I can completely deny all accusations of gerrymandering for the sake of the Progressive Party, if that's what is being hinted at.

I appreciate your will to include my first proposal, but we have to include all the proposals-even Gustaf's serious alphabetical one

I also was not accusing you of gerrymandering, I actually quite like your proposal. What I was inferring was that this poll includes only states that fit into the PP's plan for regions.

My plan is no way PP or any other party.  It's just my plan.  Remember, I'm a democrat

[Gustaf]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well, I think that these are the only five - excluding the "joke" and the regions with too few voters. I request the VP to let the proposals as they currently are stand.

Stop calling it the 'joke'! the 'joke', the 'joke'...what is that?

Was it a serious proprosal?

What do you think?

I'd think not, hence the cognomen "joke"

Stop using that word. I will have to see my psychiatrist about this. I put my soul into it...

[Siege40]

Eveery proposal must be here, including the one with two people in the region. If its stupid, people won't vote for it.

Or we can go back to the original idea and let people nominate for their top 5 for the poll.

VP Harry, as the president's Representative, it's your call.

There must be at least 3 people in each region for two senators and a governor.
If a plan does not follow that, it couldn't be used so it shouldn't even be considered.
Of course, one could always get someone to move to a different state, like I did with Siege40 . . .

Indeed, if there is a problem of placement I am entirely willing to shift into other regions, so if need be, move me. Just ask permission first. If we've begun voting I am ready.

Siege40

[Emsworth]

Indeed, if there is a problem of placement I am entirely willing to shift into other regions, so if need be, move me. Just ask permission first. If we've begun voting I am ready.

You could stay where you are, as the Southeast needs voters.

[7,052,770]

Eveery proposal must be here, including the one with two people in the region. If its stupid, people won't vote for it.

Or we can go back to the original idea and let people nominate for their top 5 for the poll.

VP Harry, as the president's Representative, it's your call.

There must be at least 3 people in each region for two senators and a governor.
If a plan does not follow that, it couldn't be used so it shouldn't even be considered.
Of course, one could always get someone to move to a different state, like I did with Siege40 . . .

Indeed, if there is a problem of placement I am entirely willing to shift into other regions, so if need be, move me. Just ask permission first. If we've begun voting I am ready.

Siege40

No, you need to stay right where you are.  Just about every map needs Southeasterners.

[Platypus]

Regions don't HAVE to have governors.

It was so desired by the "initial vote."

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I offer my most sincere apologia for having offended you. Since you insist, I shall include the regions in question.

Thank you, I completely and appreciatively accept the apology

Now it's time for an edit-with all the proposals, and we can start voting (Unless you think it would be a good idea to start a new thread...we are on page three already afterall...)

[Emsworth]

Now it's time for an edit-with all the proposals, and we can start voting (Unless you think it would be a good idea to start a new thread...we are on page three already afterall...)

I will add Gustaf's alphabetical proposal, and then make a new thread.

[Gustaf]

Now it's time for an edit-with all the proposals, and we can start voting (Unless you think it would be a good idea to start a new thread...we are on page three already afterall...)

I will add Gustaf's alphabetical proposal, and then make a new thread.

Thank you. At last some recognition. I will proudly stand by it.

[7,052,770]

yeah. new thread.

[Platypus]

Not just Gustaf's alphabetical proposal, I presume. You will be adding *all* the proposals, right? Or at least all with three members, which the VP said was alright?

[7,052,770]

Not just Gustaf's alphabetical proposal, I presume. You will be adding *all* the proposals, right? Or at least all with three members, which the VP said was alright?

I would suppose so.
Three is the absolute minimum

[Siege40]

A thread with all the maps? Sounds good to me. How many maps is that?

Siege40

[Platypus]

IIRC, 13

[minionofmidas]

exactly. The first one was a joke, but the second was actually quite a good proposal.

What do you mean 'joke'? That hurts, that really does.

At least your first one was a good joke. The second one's a bad one, though.

[Gustaf]

exactly. The first one was a joke, but the second was actually quite a good proposal.

What do you mean 'joke'? That hurts, that really does.

At least your first one was a good joke. The second one's a bad one, though.

Ouch.