PA-12 Special Election/PPP: Democrats risk losing seat to the Republicans (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 01:17:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 House Election Polls
  PA-12 Special Election/PPP: Democrats risk losing seat to the Republicans (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA-12 Special Election/PPP: Democrats risk losing seat to the Republicans  (Read 4331 times)
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


« on: April 22, 2010, 09:43:31 AM »

Recently? Yes. In the past? It was(would be) a very strong Democratic district.

It has been held by the GOP since 1974, with part of the district (basically Westmoreland County) being Democratic since 1932. 

To put it into perspective, I think my great grandfather voted for the last successful Republican for Congress there, in 1930.  He died in 1939. Smiley
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2010, 11:54:33 AM »

Outside of his anti-war stance, Murtha was hardly a Democrat, so it's not like it's any big ideological shift if Burns wins.

I was under the impression he was a typical economically liberal and socially moderate-conservative West PA Dem (other than his opposition to the Iraq War, as you said). I doubt that's the case with Burns.

He was basically very pro-union, anti-free trade.  Economically, I'd say liberal.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2010, 09:12:31 AM »

Outside of his anti-war stance, Murtha was hardly a Democrat, so it's not like it's any big ideological shift if Burns wins.

I was under the impression he was a typical economically liberal and socially moderate-conservative West PA Dem (other than his opposition to the Iraq War, as you said). I doubt that's the case with Burns.

He was basically very pro-union, anti-free trade.  Economically, I'd say liberal.

BUT you and I both know why McCain won there.

BUT, traditionally, to win there, you had to be very pro-union, and very anti free trade.  That has changed.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2010, 08:52:48 AM »

Susquehanna has Critz up, by eight, I think.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2010, 10:25:17 AM »

Dem polls says GOP +3
GOP Poll says Dem +8


This is interesting.

Susquehanna doesn't exactly have a good record. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 15 queries.