1968 Election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 05:08:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1968 Election
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: 1968 Election  (Read 10515 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 11, 2004, 03:31:01 PM »


Cheesy "People who are died"
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,478
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 12, 2004, 03:43:38 AM »

I remember a governor (or a senator or a rep. I didn't know...) who has just died but he was still on electorate votes. And I think that it's his woman who has occupied the mandate. But it's espicially to make spirit.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 12, 2004, 07:49:30 AM »

I remember a governor (or a senator or a rep. I didn't know...) who has just died but he was still on electorate votes. And I think that it's his woman who has occupied the mandate. But it's espicially to make spirit.

You must be talking about Mel Carnahan, the Missouri governor who was running for Senator in 2000.  He died right before the election, won on the sympathy vote, and his widow was appointed to take his place until the next congressional election 2 years later.

The whole think stunk to high heaven and was very questionable.  Jean Carnahan served 2 years in the Senate, and then lost the election in 2002 to Jim Talent.

It would be a really serious problem if something like that happened at the presidential level.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 12, 2004, 01:13:58 PM »

Well, since the voters chose Jean Carnahan, I don't see how it stunk or how it was questionable. I suppose maybe the Democrats deliberately sabotaged Carnahan's plane in order to win themselves a Senate seat...wouldn't put it past those SOBs, right?

You are very right though, that at a Presidential level, this would be a real problem. Although I am a staunch opponent of the Electoral College, I admit this is one situation in which it would be somewhat helpful. If a presidential candidate died and there was not enough time to get his name off the ballot, the Electors themselves could choose someone else when they convene to vote, if the deceased candidate won the election. The party would, hopefully, announce their choice of a replacement candidate in advance (though they wouldn't HAVE to), but the fact that the dead candidate's name was still on the ballot wouldn't be a problem other than in the confusion it would cause to voters.

If the election were decided by popular vote, this could still be remedied, but there would have to be a law stating the exact order of succession of Presidential candidates. Presumably the VP nominee would become the Presidential nominee and then would choose a new VP nominee.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 12, 2004, 03:30:56 PM »

Well, since the voters chose Jean Carnahan, I don't see how it stunk or how it was questionable. I suppose maybe the Democrats deliberately sabotaged Carnahan's plane in order to win themselves a Senate seat...wouldn't put it past those SOBs, right?

You are very right though, that at a Presidential level, this would be a real problem. Although I am a staunch opponent of the Electoral College, I admit this is one situation in which it would be somewhat helpful. If a presidential candidate died and there was not enough time to get his name off the ballot, the Electors themselves could choose someone else when they convene to vote, if the deceased candidate won the election. The party would, hopefully, announce their choice of a replacement candidate in advance (though they wouldn't HAVE to), but the fact that the dead candidate's name was still on the ballot wouldn't be a problem other than in the confusion it would cause to voters.

If the election were decided by popular vote, this could still be remedied, but there would have to be a law stating the exact order of succession of Presidential candidates. Presumably the VP nominee would become the Presidential nominee and then would choose a new VP nominee.

Actually, I think the Republicans sabotaged Wellstone's plane because they knew they could beat Walter Mondale.

Maybe you're right and it was legitimate.  I guess he died too close to the election to replace him on the ballot, and the voters knew that his wife would be appointed in his place.  I have had family members in politics, so I know about political shenanigans.  I think when electing somebody, the whole thing should be above-board, and as long as that was the case, it was probably legitimate.

What was not legitimate about that election is that the Gore campaign and Jesse Jackson filed suit to keep the polls in heavily Democratic St. Louis open late, after the rest of the state's polls closed, and it turns out the man in whose name the suit was made, claiming that he had been unable to vote due to long lines at the polls, was dead.
Logged
Nephthys
Rookie
**
Posts: 16


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: August 08, 2013, 03:08:56 PM »

Wallace
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.225 seconds with 12 queries.