NY: Sienna Research Institute: Sen. Gillibrand (D) leads Republican opponents 2:1
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 06:08:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  NY: Sienna Research Institute: Sen. Gillibrand (D) leads Republican opponents 2:1
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NY: Sienna Research Institute: Sen. Gillibrand (D) leads Republican opponents 2:1  (Read 408 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 24, 2010, 09:31:04 AM »

New Poll: New York Senator (Special) by Sienna Research Institute on 2010-05-20

Summary: D: 51%, R: 25%, I: 0%, U: 24%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2010, 09:42:14 AM »

GOP Primary:

Dio Guardi: 15%
Blakeman: 8%
Malpass: 4%
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2010, 03:17:12 PM »

The problem for any NY GOP candidate that isn't well established like Giuliani or Pataki is they don't have that automatic base that gets them to 40% or above. Instead they have to start off in the 20's.


From wikipedia, DioGuardi seems like a respectable person. Working with Dems on South African Apartheid when the common image was the GOP didn't care. He also says he can raise $10 million dollars. He may be our best bet. The GOP has a history of nominating moderate GOPers with no money or following who get creamed (Mills in 2004) I think running a conservative with money or the ability to raise it (if he really will or is just BSing) and the ability to attract some following that can get 38%-40% is better then a someone who will get 32% or less. A moderate like Pataki or Giuliani (when he was still moderate) are one thing, a moderate like Mills is another story entirely.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.