The futur of the dem party: Edwards or Hillary? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 01:57:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  The futur of the dem party: Edwards or Hillary? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: The futur of the dem party must be Edwards or H Clinton? (to win next election)
#1
Edwards (I'm D)
 
#2
Hillary Clinton (I'm D)
 
#3
Edwards (I'm R)
 
#4
Hillary Clinton (I'm R)
 
#5
Edwards (I'm other)
 
#6
Hillary Clinton (I'm other)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 52

Author Topic: The futur of the dem party: Edwards or Hillary?  (Read 37642 times)
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,024
United States


« on: November 03, 2004, 08:06:00 AM »


Neither, though Edwards probably has a better chance than Hillary.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,024
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2004, 03:46:28 PM »


Warner wouldn't be that bad of a choice.  What this election has shown is, even though I like Edwards, he wasn't ready for the big seat.  Even up to recently he was showing gaps in his understanding of the position which lay before him.  He has 4 years to mature, but with him being outside of the political scene, I'm not sure if he would gain it.

Warner, on the other hand, has a decent chance, at least in the mid-Atlantic states.  He might be a bit too conservative on some issues for the Democratic core (defined loosely since I am still projecting a split in the Democratic party as a result of Kerry losing this election), but should be appealing on the overall.

3 years to wait and see.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 15 queries.