NY: Sienna Research Institute: Gillibrand will also easily win
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:09:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  NY: Sienna Research Institute: Gillibrand will also easily win
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NY: Sienna Research Institute: Gillibrand will also easily win  (Read 622 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 15, 2010, 10:01:02 AM »

New Poll: New York Senator (Special) by Sienna Research Institute on 2010-07-13

Summary: D: 51%, R: 29%, I: 0%, U: 20%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2010, 03:13:14 PM »

Gillbrand might actually face a primary challenge after all.  Manhattan lawyer Gail Goode recently delivered 3 times the number of signatures necessary to get on the ballot, supposedly from all the right places.   Of course, given New York's byzantine ballot access laws, that still might be enough after the Gillibrand campaign challenges the signatures for minor technicalities.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2010, 04:38:59 PM »

Gillbrand might actually face a primary challenge after all.  Manhattan lawyer Gail Goode recently delivered 3 times the number of signatures necessary to get on the ballot, supposedly from all the right places.   Of course, given New York's byzantine ballot access laws, that still might be enough after the Gillibrand campaign challenges the signatures for minor technicalities.

Gillibrand would still probably win.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2010, 04:51:07 PM »
« Edited: July 15, 2010, 05:42:35 PM by cinyc »

Gillbrand might actually face a primary challenge after all.  Manhattan lawyer Gail Goode recently delivered 3 times the number of signatures necessary to get on the ballot, supposedly from all the right places.   Of course, given New York's byzantine ballot access laws, that still might be enough after the Gillibrand campaign challenges the signatures for minor technicalities.

Gillibrand would still probably win.

Gillibrand will win.  She has $7.2 million in the bank, ready to spend on ads if seriously challenged.
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2010, 05:21:36 PM »
« Edited: July 15, 2010, 11:12:10 PM by Kevin »

What else could you reasonably expect from the NY GOP?
Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2010, 07:20:35 PM »

Gillbrand might actually face a primary challenge after all.  Manhattan lawyer Gail Goode recently delivered 3 times the number of signatures necessary to get on the ballot, supposedly from all the right places.   Of course, given New York's byzantine ballot access laws, that still might be enough after the Gillibrand campaign challenges the signatures for minor technicalities.

Then I will be voting for Goode. Smiley
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,754
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2010, 08:54:49 PM »

Gillibrand has been a consistent FF in the senate. Would vote for her easily.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.