Divided or Mandate? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:02:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Divided or Mandate? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Divided or Mandate?  (Read 27265 times)
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,084
Ukraine


« on: January 15, 2005, 02:48:52 PM »

Bush didn't have a mandate in his first term because he didn't win the popular vote.  Plus, he had his re-election options to worry about, so he couldn't pursue a radical agenda with such a bitterly divided electorate.

But this election changed that.  Bush won a majority, strengthened his support in Congress, and now doesn't have to worry about getting re-elected.  He's virtually free to do what he wants.  I'd call it a mandate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 13 queries.