Divided or Mandate? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:17:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Divided or Mandate? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Divided or Mandate?  (Read 27266 times)
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« on: December 28, 2004, 12:39:25 PM »

America is evenly polarized.  Check out Bush's post-election approval numbers:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2026&ncid=2026&e=5&u=/latimests/20041228/ts_latimes/reelectionhoneymoonwithvoterseludesbushpollssay

I guess people are coming to their senses too late.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2005, 06:57:46 AM »

120,000 more votes in Ohio and Kerry would be our president. Not a Mandate

Yeah? And 100k votes in Illinois would have made Nixon our president in 1960. Obviously Kennedy didn't have a mandate either.

Nobody said he did.

The key reason that Bush's win was not a mandate has to do with more than its extreme narrowness.  It is also important that it was extremely regional.  The country remains polarized - South/Rural/religious against the Coasts/urban/secular.  Each about 50/50, and each with a very firm base.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.