Opinion of Adolf Hitler

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

Whether he would be able to find support in Germany for that is an interesting speculation.

I wasn't aware that opposite opinions were something that really mattered when he wanted something...

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

Okay, to clarify all I'm saying is that it is time we to start to recognize the positive things Hitler did, instead of always focusing on the negative.

While it is true he underestimated the USSR in 1941, it is also true that the USSR would have attacked Europe anyway had Hitler waited a few more years. I think it is safe to say Hitler saved Western civilization from Communism by striking first, when the USSR was weaker.

Germans today are largely infertile, a good many are non-German immigrants imported from other natons.

Regarding wages, that seems rather petty when considering he wiped out a 30% unemployment rate and initiated an economic boom. Wages in 1938 were about the same as in 1928.

It is an indisputable fact that the West has been on an unstoppable moral, intellectual, and social decline ever since the Allies destroyed Germany.

Why are we not allowed to have positive opinions about Hitler? Russians have positive opinions of Stalin, and he was responsible for more deaths.

What are you talking about? Are you living in 1975?

Read this.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2559010520070725?feedType=RSS&rpc=22&sp=true

Yes, because history books have been changed in the way you would change it for Hitler, because the authoritarianism and will of power of Putin found a good background in which settling with the superpower that Stalin embodied, because Russia felt destroyed and ruined by the democratic era, because Russia has an authoritarian 'tradition', because...

It's not because Russians do something that this is necessarily good.

You're allowed to think what you want about Hitler, and people are allowed to debate with you and to tell why they think your points are flawed.

Also, lot of what you say is based on 'if that had happened', I could write a lot of fairy tales History stuffs by 'if such had happened', you can to entertain yourself, but using it in debates is rather empty.

this thread's 'objective' and the genocide-loving retard who started it

I think the point precisely is to sideline the crimes, to try to show the 'good'. I think the point of such things rather are then to try to justify authoritarianism and maybe political violence to an extent, along with trying to justify a need of conservation of 'cultural purity', or something like that...

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

Well, he's certainly been a good leader for the History Channel.

...and arte (a French-German TV channel).

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

Yay, interwebs 80 years latter psychiatry.

Nobody knows what was his part of sanity, and it hasn't the slightest importance to give a judgments on his acts.

Libertas is probably right that had Hitler succeeded, he would have been regarded as a hero in the West.

Besides the fact that remaking History is one of the most, if not the most, pointless thing.

Ah yes?

Humanity, or at least Europe wouldn't care about the 1st industrial mass murder in History which happened on its territory? Daring, to say the least.

West was already recognizing the fact that slavery was bad, and slavery wasn't even direct murder, then Holocaust...

The only ones who wouldn't care of Holocaust today, or who would ultimately contest it are, either marginal (some white supremacists in West and former USSR, and some new World Order kind for the most part), or come from regions that haven't directly been concerned by it and who have an issue with Israel seen as a present given to Jews by West to apologize for Holocaust in the detriment of populations that had nothing to do with Holocaust (that is some anti-zionist movements in some Muslim countries, but here too it remains marginal movement, not populations).

Then the only one who wouldn't recognize it would be marginal in West and some movements which also remain marginal from part of regions which didn't live it and which have an issue with one of its consequence. It's not like it's something that could that easily be skipped, and each time it is, it is because of some extremism and/or ignorance and/or passion.