Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 18, 2019, 09:13:01 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Atlas Fantasy Elections
| |-+  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Gustaf, Lumine)
| | |-+  The Federal Unionization and Competitive Contracting Bill (search mode)
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: The Federal Unionization and Competitive Contracting Bill  (Read 7795 times)
PBrunsel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,556


View Profile WWW
« on: November 06, 2004, 07:47:06 pm »

So all this is is allowing government officials and workers to form unions and then appointing an organization to check that they are working efficiently. That's the jist of it isn't it?
Logged
PBrunsel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,556


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2004, 07:54:39 pm »

No one is being forced to join a Union to be in government, correct?
Logged
PBrunsel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,556


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2004, 07:59:28 pm »

So all this is is allowing government officials and workers to form unions and then appointing an organization to check that they are working efficiently. That's the jist of it isn't it?

Correct. It guarantees the right of all federal employees to unionize, but ensures that if they are failing to perform their job, the job duties that they perform may be contracted out to private businesses. It is designed to ensure competition between unions and private industry on a fair and equitable basis, with neither side having an unfair advantage.

Privitzation would still be done under contract from the government, so private industry that performs formerly government functions is still subject to review, and these services could be "unoutsourced" back to the government if the contractors aren't doing their job, either.

It will ensure that all services are provided as efficiently as possible for the people, with proper accountability.

It seems you've done your home work Nym. I am no Union hater and it seems that this would just help free enterprise.

My only reservation is that this seems to be just another way to increase fantasy government. Appointing 5 people to oversee that they are efficently ran. Why not just let the Secretary of Forum Affairs do that?
Logged
PBrunsel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9,556


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2004, 11:09:33 am »

I sign this into law.

President PBrunsel
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines