The Federal Unionization and Competitive Contracting Bill (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 06:41:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  The Federal Unionization and Competitive Contracting Bill (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Federal Unionization and Competitive Contracting Bill  (Read 9394 times)
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW
« on: November 06, 2004, 07:47:06 PM »

So all this is is allowing government officials and workers to form unions and then appointing an organization to check that they are working efficiently. That's the jist of it isn't it?
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2004, 07:54:39 PM »

No one is being forced to join a Union to be in government, correct?
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2004, 07:59:28 PM »

So all this is is allowing government officials and workers to form unions and then appointing an organization to check that they are working efficiently. That's the jist of it isn't it?

Correct. It guarantees the right of all federal employees to unionize, but ensures that if they are failing to perform their job, the job duties that they perform may be contracted out to private businesses. It is designed to ensure competition between unions and private industry on a fair and equitable basis, with neither side having an unfair advantage.

Privitzation would still be done under contract from the government, so private industry that performs formerly government functions is still subject to review, and these services could be "unoutsourced" back to the government if the contractors aren't doing their job, either.

It will ensure that all services are provided as efficiently as possible for the people, with proper accountability.

It seems you've done your home work Nym. I am no Union hater and it seems that this would just help free enterprise.

My only reservation is that this seems to be just another way to increase fantasy government. Appointing 5 people to oversee that they are efficently ran. Why not just let the Secretary of Forum Affairs do that?
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2004, 11:09:33 AM »

I sign this into law.

President PBrunsel
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.